View clinical trials related to Surgical Site Infection.
Filter by:The study will be carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore for one year . . Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy will be randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients will be called for follow up checkup on 14th days after operation and after one month. Both of the groups will be checked and recorded for SSI after operation and hospital stay.
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label and parallel clinical trial, assigned to early, mid, or late withdrawal of urinary catheter with a 1: 1: 1 allocation ratio. POPULATION: Patients undergoing anterior rectal resection, low rectal resection, or abdominoperineal amputation for any reason. OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to compare the incidence of acute urine retention after removal of the urinary catheter in the postoperative period of rectal resection. Secondary objectives are: 1. Incidence of urinary tract infection after urinary catheter removal. 2. Incidence of specific postoperative complications (Surgical wound infection, Respiratory infection, Anastomotic dehiscence, ileus). 3. Incidence of postoperative complications assessed according to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scale. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERVENTION: In all patients, a Rectal Resection (anterior rectal resection, posterior pelvic exenteration or abdominoperineal amputation) will be performed. In group 1A, the urinary catheter will be removed on the 1st postoperative day. In group 1B patients, the urinary catheter will be removed on the 3rd postoperative day. In group 1C patients, the urinary catheter will be removed on the 5th postoperative day. All patients will have a urine culture taken at the time of withdrawal.
This is a prospective randomized, controlled, unblinded, interventional feasibility study to evaluate if showering with post operative drains in place leads to an increase in complications. The patients included in the study will be those undergoing breast reductions and panniculectomies at Geisinger Medical Center. The patients will be randomized post operatively into one of two groups: 1) patients instructed to shower with drains in place, and 2) patients instructed not to shower while they have drains in place.
In the present study we will compare bacteriological findings and the incidence of SSI in relation to laminar airflow (LAF) ventilated ORs, conventional (also called displacement or mixed) ventilated ORs and conventional ventilated ORs with the addition of tables equipped with units providing a local LAF over the surgical instruments. The hypothesis is that there exist a correlation between number and types of airborne bacteria and bacteria in the surgical wound and on surgical instruments at the time of wound closure.
The purpose of the study is to assess the effectiveness of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic in reducing surgical site infections in certain dermatological procedures. Patients will undergo surgical excision or Mohs surgery as is clinically indicated and part of usual care. The study will be a double blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be assigned to one of three participant categories: 1) patients undergoing repair with skin flap or graft on the nose, 2) patients undergoing repair with skin graft, flap, or wedge resection on the ear, or 3) patients undergoing Mohs surgery with closure or partial closure or surgical excision on the lower extremity below the knee. Within each category, participants will be randomized into one of two groups: group one will receive a preoperative placebo pill and group two will receive preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (either a single dose of Cephalexin 2g PO or single dose of Clindamycin hydrochloride 600 mg PO if allergy to penicillin or cephalosporin). Patients will followed for 30 days +/- 7 after surgery to evaluate for any surgical site infection.
A surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection that occurs after a surgical procedure. Despite a variety of infection prevention strategies, SSIs still occur often and impose a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system. Intraoperative irrigation (or washing of the surgical incision before closure) may reduce SSIs, but this is uncertain. The Clinical Evaluation of Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery Utilizing Intraoperative Incisional Wound Irrigation (CLEAN Wound) trial aims to determine if incisional wound irrigation with an antiseptic or salt water solution can reduce SSIs within 30 days of surgery compared to no wound irrigation. 2,500 patients aged 18 years or older who are planned to undergo an abdominal or groin open or laparoscopic procedure will be randomly assigned to incisional wound irrigation with povidone-iodine solution; or incisional wound irrigation with saline; or no irrigation and followed for 30 days after surgery to assess the incidence of SSIs, with additional outcomes collected up to 90 days after surgery. Even with significant advances in medicine over the past decades, there are still many fundamental issues in perioperative care that remain unclear due to lack of evidence. If this trial were to demonstrate that intraoperative wound irrigation reduces the incidence of SSI, these practice-changing findings could greatly benefit patients worldwide.
The Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program in Catalonia (VINCat) monitors surgical site infection (SSI) in elective colorectal surgery since 2007 in 55 public and private acute care hospitals. These hospitals perform active and prospective standardized surveillance of elective colorectal resections. Post-discharge surveillance is mandatory at least up to 30 days after surgery. Hospitals are classified according to their size into three groups: >500 hospital beds; 200-500 beds; <200 beds. Aim. To examine the effect on SSI rate of a specific preventative bundle in elective colorectal surgery. Methods. Pragmatic study using VINCat prospective colorectal database from 2007 to 2018. In 2016, a bundle of six preventative measures was recommended to the VINCat hospitals. To compare the results of SSI before (baseline phase, BP) and after the bundle implementation (implementation phase, IP) a logistic regression model has been established. The results will be shown as Odds Ratio (OR) and the corresponding confidence intervalsCI95. The significance level will be fixed at 5% (P < 0.05).
Surgical site infection (SSI) is the main complication of surgery. The prevention of superficial SSI by topical prophylaxis is controversial. Human studies on wound lavage with topical solutions (saline, antiseptics or antibiotics) are old and do not yield conclusive results. In experimental conditions there is evidence in favor of the efficiency wound lavage with saline and antibiotic solutions. Clinical studies are needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of antibiotic lavage. Objective. Study of the efficacy of topical antibiotic therapy in the prevention of SSI in patients undergoing abdominal surgery with different risk of infection. Method. Project comprising several randomized double-blind clinical trials with a common methodology. Procedures with varying degrees of contamination, as emergency abdominal surgery, cesareans and complex abdominal wall reconstructions will be studied. Follow-up will be 30 days after operation. Data will be collected anonymously and the relationships between the variables will be analyzed using Pearson's chi-square, survival analysis and analysis of risk factors as appropriate. The effect of topical antibiotic on hospital stay, resistance patterns in SSI, and antibiotic serum levels will be analyzed.
Phase III, Prospective, Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Two-arm, Double Blind Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of D-PLEX Administered Concomitantly with the Standard of Care (SoC), Compared to a SoC Treated Control Arm, in Prevention of Post Abdominal Surgery Incisional Infection.
Comparing the incidence of SSI in cases using coated Polyglactin 910 suture with Triclosan and cases using Polyglactin 910 suture without Triclosan in clean-contaminated wound surgery