View clinical trials related to Supraventricular Arrhythmia.
Filter by:During electrophysiological study (EPS) multiple drugs are used to reveal arrhythmias and/or conductive system disorders. Two most often used agents are atropine and isoprenaline. Due to their distinct pharmacological properties, they are affecting myocardium in different manner. Those dissimilarities can affect the EPS course and long-term prognosis. The aim of presented study is to evaluate the optimal protocol of pharmacotherapy during EPS.
1. Questionnaire for supraventricular tachycardia: About history and targeted diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia 2. Extended Signal-averaged ECG for detailed P-Wave analysis and to calculate a virtual atrial electrocardiogram (ECG)
This study will enroll patients initiating Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors without history of documented arrhythmia while on therapy using the Medtronic LINQ-2 insertable cardiac monitor (ILR). The incidence of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and other arrhythmia will be determined. Actions taken in response to device detected arrhythmia will be recorded.
The purpose of this study to assess the longitudinal changes in left atrial strain and supraventricular arrhythmia burden after chemotherapeutic strategies in cardiac light chain amyloidosis.
Sotalol is an antiarrhythmic medication with proven effects for the suppression and prevention of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Due to its potential proarrhythmic effect, its introduction should be cautious, and several guidelines recommend starting the medication in hospital settings. However, patients at low risk for a proarrhythmic effect start the medication in outpatient units, despite the lack of clinical studies in the literature that demonstrate the safety of introducing the medication outside the hospital environment. This research project aims to assess the safety introduction of sotalol in an outpatient unit basis. Our hypothesis is that outpatient introduction of sotalol is safe for low-risk patients and an electrocardiographic analysis after 2 hours of the first dose of medication is a predictor of electrocardiographic changes found after 72 hours. In this research, serial electrocardiographic analysis with measurements of the QT corrected intervals and its dispersion, as well as clinical and laboratory parameters will be performed in 110 patients.
New-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (NOSVA) is reported in 40 % of patients with septic shock and is associated with hemodynamic alterations and mortality. The lack of consensus regarding best practices for the management of NOSVA in this setting has led to major variations in practice patterns. Observational studies reported three usual strategies: (i) heart rate control (hereafter rate control) with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on low dose of amiodarone, (ii) rhythm control with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs, essentially based on high dose of amiodarone, and electrical cardioversionand (iii) modifiable NOSVA risk factors control (hereafter risk control) without using antiarrhythmic drugs. Risk control would minimize adverse events of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rhythm control would rapidly improve haemodynamics via restoring diastole and decreasing cardiac metabolic demand, while minimizing exposure to anticoagulation. Rate control, would limit potential adverse events of high dose of amiodarone and of electrical cardioversion (only in patients intubated on mechanical ventilation), while controlling haemodynamics. Therefore, it seems important to compare these three strategies. Our hypothesis is dual: first, that rate control and rhythm control each improve hemodynamics with in fine a decreased mortality, as compared to a risk control; second, that rhythm control outperforms rate control in this setting. This is a multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of these three strategies (risk control, rate control and rhythm control) for NOSVA during septic shock.
Arrhythmias accompany septic shock in increased rates than in other ICU cohorts and their presence and management are related to patient´s prognosis. 1c class antiarrhythmics are seldom administered in intensive care due to a dose dependent toxicity published in case reports and unfavourable outcome reported in a few prospective trials done on cardiology patients. The papers on 1c class antiarrhythmics do not take into consideration a complex haemodynamic assessment using echocardiography. The authors have recently presented a retrospective study on SV arrhythmias in septic shock patients demonstrating favourable effect and safety of propafenone which showed higher antiarrhythmic efficacy than amiodarone.