View clinical trials related to Suicidal Ideation.
Filter by:The goal of this interventional study is to assess the effectiveness of the universal suicide prevention program "Youth Aware of Mental Health" in 3rd-year secondary education students in Galicia. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the YAM program effective in reducing severe suicidal ideation at 12 months from baseline within the experimental group and compared to the control group? - Is the YAM program effective in preventing the incidence of new suicidal attempts, 12 months from baseline in the experimental group compared to the control group? All participants in this study will be asked to: Complete a survey at baseline and after 12 months, consisting of measures for suicidal ideation and behavior, depressive symptoms, seeking help behaviors, bullying, problematic internet use, and emotional distress. Only those allocated to the experimental group will be asked to: Undergo the YAM program, an evidence-based intervention structured into five one-hour class group sessions (45-50 min.), focused on problem-solving by peers. The program consists of interactive presentations, dilemma discussions, role-playing, and reflection, all moderated by a trained YAM instructor. Twelve months after the intervention, all participants will undergo a re-evaluation using the same protocol. The researchers will compare differences in pre- and post-measures within the experimental and control groups, as well as between both groups, to assess the impact of the YAM intervention on outcomes such as suicidal ideation and attempts. At the end of the study, those who were allocated to the control group are going to be offered the YAM intervention program.
Youth involved in the juvenile justice system evidence disproportionately high rates of suicidal thoughts and behavior (STB) and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) compared to adolescents in the general population. It is estimated that upwards of 50% of justice-involved youth (JIY) in secure facilities report NSSI and suicide attempts.1-3 Suicide attempts are estimated to be between two and four times more frequent in incarcerated JIY than adolescents in the community,4 and the rates of STB in JIY are higher than non-JIY in the community. The overwhelming majority of JIY are not placed in secure facilities and almost all incarcerated youth are eventually released to the community.5 Consequently, STB is a major concern of JIY residing in the community and it is critical that this population has access to evidence-based treatment for STB and NSSI. Contributing to the problem, racial and ethnic minority youth are disproportionately represented among JIY6 and JIY are more likely to reside in neighborhoods with limited resources,7 including restricted access to community mental health treatment.8,9 Further, most community mental health providers who treat JIY have not been trained in evidence-based interventions that are specifically designed to treat NSSI and STB; this often leads to JIY experiencing prolonged periods of NSSI and/or STB.10 Training community mental health providers who serve JIY in the detection and treatment of NSSI and STB has promise to decrease the overall suicide risk for JIY. The primary goal of this application is to train community providers in established, core strategies for adolescent STB and NSSI.11 The training program has been used in two clinical trials, refined for inpatient psychiatric and Emergency Department providers, and modified for use in community practice. Our Primary Aim is to implement a systems-level intervention focused on increasing access to evidence-based treatment strategies specifically designed to treat STB and NSSI behaviors for the JIY referred to outpatient care by the RIFC. First, the investigators will conduct a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial with 9 Rhode Island CMHAs who serve JIY. After all sites complete a Usual Care phase, three CMHAs per year will be randomized to the Preparation Phase to receive training in evidence-based strategies for NSSI and STB, using a training program called COPES,11 developed by the MPI for inpatient psychiatry units and Emergency Departments, transported to CMHAs by Consultant and consistent with recommendations in SAMHSA's Youth Suicide Treatment Guide.13 Agencies then move into Implementation Phase for consultation and support followed by a Sustainment phase. Second, guided by the Reach Effectiveness-Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, the investigators will conduct qualitative interviews and administer agency and provider demographic questionnaires and organizational readiness measures with CMHA providers and administrators to identify system-, agency-, and provider-level factors that promote or hinder the uptake and sustainment of evidence-based treatment for STB and NSSI at CMHAs serving JIY. At the provider level, the investigators hypothesize that training in the use of evidence-based treatment strategies for STB and NSSI will: a) significantly increase the use of these strategies and b) the quality of their delivery will be in the "acceptable" range during the Sustainment Phase. At the client/patient level, the investigators hypothesize that the intervention will keep families engaged more than Usual Care phase, increase sessions attended, and reduce rates of adolescent STB and NSSI that require emergency psychiatric care. At the systems level, the investigators hypothesize that the training program will be sustained for at least one year, and up to 3 years, by CMHA administrators. The investigators will also examine factors that may affect the effectiveness of uptake and sustainment of the training program, i.e., organizational readiness, climate, and leadership at each CMHA.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a suicide prevention strategy delivered via telehealth in Emergency Departments. We will compare implementation of the Safety Planning Intervention plus follow-up calls (SPI+) delivered by Emergency Department (ED) staff to SPI+ delivered via ED referral to an off-site Suicide Prevention Consultation Center (SPCC).
The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a digital intervention in reducing suicide attempts.
Advocates for ALLY Youth (ALLY) is a universal, school-based, multicomponent positive psychology program aimed to increase youth's well-being and reduce symptoms of psychological distress including depression, anxiety, and stress.
The Mobile-Interpretation Bias Modification clinical trial aims to examine the efficacy of a brief mobile phone delivered interpretation bias modification to reduce anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns and suicidal ideation in National Guard Personnel. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy, acceptability, and usability of M-IBM with a sample of 114 National Guardsmen with current suicidal ideation and elevated anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns. Participants will complete assessments, receive assistance on installing M- IBM on their phone, complete an M-IBM intervention session, and complete post-intervention assessments. Baseline measures of psychopathology, and usability/acceptability of M-IBM will be obtained during the initial session. In addition, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups would be scheduled to examine changes in psychopathology. The investigators hypothesize that those randomized to M-IBM will experience reductions in anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns, suicidal ideation. In addition participants will find M-IBM acceptable and easy to use.
The overall goal for the proposed project is to test the effectiveness of BCBT for the prevention of suicide attempts in a sample of treatment-seeking U.S. military personnel and veterans. The standard null hypothesis will involve tests conducted comparing improvement following BCBT (treatment duration of 12 weeks) to Person-Centered Therapy (PCT). The primary outcome comparisons will include direct markers of suicidality (i.e. suicide, suicide attempts). Secondary outcomes will be suicide ideation and indicators of psychiatric distress (e.g., depression, hopelessness). We also aim to assess several hypothesized psychological and neurocognitive mediators of treatment effects (e.g., wish to live, attentional bias, emotion regulation). Participants will be followed for 2 years posttreatment by independent evaluators blind to treatment condition.
Most clinical major depression responds to standard treatments (medication and psychotherapy); however, a significant subset of depressed patients (15-20%) do not respond to these treatments and are referred to as treatment-resistant major depression (TRMD). New treatments for TRMD are needed, and one promising line of research are drugs known as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonists. In a recent pilot study, the investigators of this study demonstrated that the NMDA antagonist nitrous oxide is effective in TRMD, reducing depressive symptoms, guilt, and suicidal thinking. To more closely investigate suicidal thinking, this study is designed as a double-blind, randomized, prospective, inpatient trial comparing inhaled nitrous oxide (N2O) plus treatment as usual versus inhaled placebo plus treatment as usual. All unipolar depressed, acutely suicidal inpatients will receive standard treatment for their depression/ suicidal thinking (TAU). Additionally, participants will undergo a maximum of four one hour inhalation sessions as inpatients and 2 booster sessions as outpatients during which they will receive either inhaled nitrous oxide (50% nitrous oxide/50% oxygen = active treatment) or placebo gas (50% nitrogen/50% oxygen). A target total of 50 patients with suicidal ideation and unipolar depression will be enrolled, 25 of whom will be assigned to the TAU control group and 25 of whom will be assigned to the N2O + TAU experimental group.
This study will monitor the symptoms of patients who have received an intervention on the psychiatric inpatient unit at Stanford hospital up to 6 months after they have received the intervention. Additionally, the acceptability and feasibility of interventions will be assessed using clinician and patient questionnaires.
This goal of this research is to examine the efficacy and feasibility of starting a phone call follow-up program for individuals discharged to the community after presenting to the Crisis Response Centre (CRC), a standalone mental health facility in Winnipeg, with suicidal ideation or behaviours. Currently there is no worldwide gold standard for how best to follow-up with individuals following presentations to health services with suicidal ideation or behaviours, despite the period immediately after discharge from mental health services being identified as a period of increased risk for death by suicide (Chung et al., 2017; Steeg et al., 2012). This risk is higher still for individuals who specifically had suicidal ideation or behaviours as a component of their reason for presenting to mental health services (Chung et al., 2017). One strategy that has been employed to mitigate this risk is brief contact interventions (BCI), which involves following up with people through text, phone calls, or written messages. Research has shown that this type of follow-up is well-received by individuals and although some studies have found this strategy reduces the rates of suicidal behaviours during this high-risk period, the overall literature shows mixed results (Miller et al., 2017; Exbrayat et al., 2017; Cebria et al., 2016; Milner et al., 2015; Morthorst et al., 2012; Fleischmann et al., 2008; Cedereke et al., 2002). Because the research on phone call follow up programs has been mixed, we will be conducting a brief trial to study the efficacy and feasibility of a phone call follow-up system in Winnipeg to inform whether or not this type of program would be of benefit to the community. In order to best study this, we will be conducting a randomized control trial for individuals who are discharged to the community after presenting to the CRC with a recent history of suicidal thoughts or behaviours. Participants will be randomized into either an intervention group or a control group. All participants will receive at least one and no more than five phone calls during the five-week period immediately following discharge from the CRC, and the content and timing of these phone calls will be different depending on which group a participant is randomized to. We will rely on both self-reported data, which will be collected in a formalized fashion, and data in the electronic medical records of participants to analyze this intervention. Our hypothesis is that the specific protocol we have designed to follow up with the intervention group will result in decreased suicidal thoughts and behaviours in the period immediately following discharge.