View clinical trials related to Substance-Related Disorders.
Filter by:This is a pilot study to examine the acceptability and effectiveness of the Re-Entry Values and Mindfulness Program (REVAMP), a group intervention for jail inmates. It is hypothesized that REVAMP will reduce post-release recidivism, substance abuse, and HIV risk behavior.
Contingency management (CM) is a demonstrably efficacious intervention for substance abuse and dependence. Although CM protocols have employed a variety of reinforcers, they have almost exclusively relied upon non-cash privileges (e.g., take-home methadone doses), prizes, or vouchers that can be exchanged for goods or services. Despite the strong empirical support for CM, our research suggests that concerns relating to its cost and safety (e.g., potential for harm caused by rewards undermining intrinsic motivation or being sold to purchase drugs) have hindered its transfer to real-world practice. The exclusive use of non-cash CM likely stems from the untested assumption that clients will use cash incentives to buy drugs or engage in other high-risk behaviors. This assumption is problematic for two reasons. First, the use of non-cash incentives may add substantial costs and complexity to CM protocols. Second, the use of non-cash incentives may reduce the efficacy of CM interventions, as research suggests that cash may be a more effective reinforcer than vouchers. This study examines both practical and ethical issues relating to cash-based CM procedures. This study consists of three phases; a main experiment, a "Cash Bowl" pilot, and a "Thinning" Pilot.
Methamphetamine (MA) dependence is a source of continuing danger for both individuals and society. While there are some behavioral treatments, they are not always effective. To date, there are no medications available to treatment methamphetamine dependence. There is some early evidence suggesting that varenicline (also known as Chantix(tm)) may help people to stop or reduce their use of methamphetamine. Varenicline is already on the market in the U.S. for cigarette smoking cessation and shows promise for treating alcohol dependence. In order to determine if varenicline can help people stop using methamphetamine, we will enroll 90 methamphetamine-dependent people who are looking for treatment into the study at the UCLA Vine Street Clinic operated by Dr Shoptaw of UCLA. Half will receive varenicline (n=45) and half will receive placebo (n=45) which will be determined randomly. Everyone will receive talk therapy for methamphetamine dependence. People will take the medication for 9 weeks followed by a 4 week follow-up period. Before receiving any medication, participants will complete a maximum 2 week (6 study visits) lead-in to complete baseline assessments, psychological and medical evaluation, and comprehensive assessment of drug use to determine study eligibility. If a person is eligible for the study, s/he will receive either varenicline or placebo. Participants will visit the UCLA Vine Street Clinic (UCLA VSC) three times a week study visits. At the end of the medication phase, subjects will complete a four week follow up period for safety monitoring.
This treatment intervention trial is designed for men and women with substance dependence and comorbid Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions (two behavioral treatments [Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and Substance Use Disorders Using Prolonged Exposure and Relapse Prevention Therapy] and an active monitoring control group) and will be evaluated at baseline and four follow-up points (post-treatment, 1-month, 2- month and 3-month post-treatment).
The proposed study is a three-armed randomized clinical trial. A total of 750 clients will be randomly assigned (using a random number table) to the interviewer-administered intervention, the self-administered intervention, and waitlist control conditions upon completion of screening, informed consent, HIV pretest counseling and test administration, and collection of baseline risk behavior data. Outcomes will be measured at 3, 6 and 12 months.
With this research, the investigators hope to learn if cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) works in people who have both PTSD and problems with drugs or alcohol. In the past, people who had problems with drugs and alcohol were not given treatment for their PTSD. It was believed that PTSD treatment would get in the way of their drug and alcohol treatment. Now the investigators believe that the PTSD symptoms may make it harder to avoid using drugs and alcohol, so the investigators want to see if people can get treatment for both problems at the same time. One hundred-sixty Veterans from 3 sites who have both PTSD and substance use disorders will be in the study. In order to know if the PTSD treatment is helpful, half of the Veterans in this study will receive PTSD treatment and half will continue to get their usual mental health and/or substance abuse treatment. Who gets which treatment will be decided by a random process. The investigators will then compare the 2 groups to see if there are differences in their PTSD symptoms.
Drum-Assisted Recovery Therapy for Native Americans (DARTNA) is an R-21 NIH/NCCAM-funded study aimed to complete the development and pilot a new substance abuse treatment protocol utilizing drumming for American Indians/Alaska Natives with substance use disorders. The study includes activities to complete the protocol, followed by a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
This study aims to investigate psychosocial risk- and protective factors such as psychiatric disorder, socio-economic background and family functioning among school dropouts and to compare the findings with those by a matched control group of regularly enrolled students.
The study examined intensive case management for homeless Veterans in addiction treatment by integrating addiction/housing case managers (AHCM), operating from a Life Skills Training perspective, into an addiction specialty program. The primary aim was to determine whether the AHCM intervention increases number of days housed during the year following treatment entry. Secondary aims were to compare costs and cost-effectiveness of AHCM vs. time and attention control, determine if AHCM improves addiction outcomes and functional status, and examine treatment process variables associated with improved outcomes.
This project will modify Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT; n=15) and Alanon/Naranon Facilitation (ANF; n=15) for use with parents who are concerned about an out-of-treatment adolescent. ANF was selected as a comparison because Alanon and Naranon are the most commonly available method for helping family members. The investigators will compare CRAFT for parents (CRAFT-P) (n=77) and ANF (n=77) to determine if there is a significant difference in adolescent treatment entry. Parents will attend a maximum of 18 sessions with a family specialist and also complete questionnaires periodically over a 12-month period. Parents' adolescents will have the opportunity to participate in the study by completing questionnaires at the same time points as their parent. Our primary hypothesis asks whether participants who are enrolled in the CRAFT-P condition will report more adolescent treatment entry than the ANF condition. Our secondary hypotheses examine: 1) reductions in adolescent substance use and behavior problems in the CRAFT-P group compared to the ANF condition, 2) improvements in parenting skills in the CRAFT-P group compared to the ANF condition and 3) significant pre to post treatment effects for improvements in social functioning, mood, and in parent-adolescent relationship satisfaction.