EXOPULSE Mollii Suit, Motor Function & Stroke (EXOSTROKE 2)

Stroke Clinical Trial

— EXOSTROKE2  

Official title:

The Effects of EXOPULSE Mollii Suit on Motor Functions in Patients With Stroke (EXOSTROKE 2)"

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06214975
• Other study ID #: EXOSTROKE2
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 24, 2023
• Est. completion date: December 2, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City
• Contact: Naji J Riachi, MD
• Phone: +97123144444
• Email: nriachi[@]ssmc.ae
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the improvement of motor functions related symptoms in patients with stroke and spasticity using Exopulse Mollii suit stimulation. The main questions it aims to answer are: to evaluate the short-term impact of EXOPULSE Mollii suit on balance in adult patients with stroke and suffering from spasticity. to assess the effects of Exopulse Mollii suit on spasticity, mobility, pain, fatigue and QoL. . Participants will participate in: One baseline visit for inclusion during which the patient will undergo the first session (active or sham) along with evaluations (before and after the session) One visit after two weeks during which the patient will undergo the second session (active or sham) along with evaluations (before and after the session) One visit after two weeks of the second stimulation condition; the patients will undergo a third evaluation and receive the EXOPULSE Mollii Suit for the four-week open label phase and will use the suit at home for an active stimulation session every other day for four weeks. One visit at the end of the open label phase to perform the fourth and last evaluation and return the EXOPULSE Mollii suit. Researchers will compare both Active and Sham groups to demonstrate the improvement of motor functions related symptoms in patients with stroke and spasticity using Exopulse Mollii suit.

Description:

The study is a randomized crossover, sham-controlled, double-blind trial to demonstrate the improvement of motor functions and stroke related symptoms following a single session of "active" versus "sham" EXOPULSE Mollii suit. A 2-week washout period should be enough to prevent a potential carry over effect. Two weeks after the end of this phase (phase 1), a second phase of this trial, an open label phase, will be proposed for all patients to understand the effects of EXOPULSE Mollii suit employed over 4 weeks (a session every other day for a total of 14 sessions) on stroke related symptoms.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 36
• Est. completion date: December 2, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: October 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age between 18 and 75 years.
• Having a clinical diagnosis of stroke since at least three months.
• Being able to walk freely or with the need of support (modified Rankin score = 4).
• Able to understand verbal instructions.
• Having spasticity with a score of at least 1+ on the MAS.
• Having a BBS score =46 associated in the literature with a risk of fall.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Being included in another research protocol during the study period.
• Inability to undergo medical monitor for the study purposes due to geographical or social reasons.
• Having a cardiac stimulator, a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, an intrathecal baclofen pump or other contraindications to using EXOPULSE Mollii suit.
• Being pregnant.
• Having a change in their stroke pharmacological therapy in the last three months.
• Suffering from other somatic or neuropsychiatric diagnoses (e.g., arrhythmias, uncontrolled epilepsy, diseases causing osteoarticular and muscular pain).
• Having a body mass index above 35 Kg/m2.
• In case of the introduction of a medical device other than EXOPULSE Mollii suit during the study period.
• Patients under juridical protection.
• Prisoners.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Muscle Spasticity
• Spastic
• Spasticity, Muscle
• Stroke

Intervention

Device:
• EXOPULSE Mollii Suit Stimulation
We designed a randomized crossover, sham-controlled, double-blind trial to demonstrate the improvement of motor functions and stroke related symptoms following a single session of "active" versus "sham" EXOPULSE Mollii suit stimulation. in phase 1, the patient will receive two stimulations separated by a two-week washout period. The patients will be randomized to receive either active/sham or sham/active and both patients and investigators will be blinded to the order in which the stimulation will be given. A 2-week washout period should be enough to prevent a potential carry over effect. Two weeks after the end of phase 1, a second open label phase (phase 2) of this trial will be proposed to all patients where they will receive active stimulation every other day at home over four weeks (for a total of 14 sessions). This will help understand the long term effects of EXOPULSE Mollii suit stimulation on stroke related symptoms.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United Arab Emirates	SSMC	Abu Dhabi

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Arab Emirates, 

References & Publications (71)

Andersen IT, Harrison A, Broholm R, Harder A, Nielsen JB, Bulow J, Pingel J. Microvascularization is not a limiting factor for exercise in adults with cerebral palsy. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Aug 1;125(2):536-544. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00827.2017. Epub 2018 May 3. — View Citation

Andringa A, van de Port I, van Wegen E, Ket J, Meskers C, Kwakkel G. Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Upper Limb Spasticity Poststroke Over Different ICF Domains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Sep;100(9):1703-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 21. — View Citation

Aree-uea B, Auvichayapat N, Janyacharoen T, Siritaratiwat W, Amatachaya A, Prasertnoo J, Tunkamnerdthai O, Thinkhamrop B, Jensen MP, Auvichayapat P. Reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Sep;97(9):954-62. — View Citation

Bakaniene I, Urbonaviciene G, Janaviciute K, Prasauskiene A. Effects of the Inerventions method on gross motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018 Sep-Oct;52(5):581-586. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 20. — View Citation

Bar-On L, Molenaers G, Aertbelien E, Van Campenhout A, Feys H, Nuttin B, Desloovere K. Spasticity and its contribution to hypertonia in cerebral palsy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:317047. doi: 10.1155/2015/317047. Epub 2015 Jan 11. — View Citation

Barnes, M.P (2008). Upper Motor Neuone Syndrome and Spasticity: Clinical Management and Neurophysiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Baude M, Nielsen JB, Gracies JM. The neurophysiology of deforming spastic paresis: A revised taxonomy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Nov;62(6):426-430. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 28. — View Citation

Bethoux F. Spasticity Management After Stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;26(4):625-39. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Sep 26. — View Citation

Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206. — View Citation

Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988 Dec;19(12):1497-500. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.12.1497. — View Citation

Burke D, Wissel J, Donnan GA. Pathophysiology of spasticity in stroke. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3 Suppl 2):S20-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827624a7. — View Citation

Busner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37. — View Citation

Camak DJ. Addressing the burden of stroke caregivers: a literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Sep;24(17-18):2376-82. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12884. Epub 2015 Jun 10. — View Citation

Campbell WI, Lewis S. Visual analogue measurement of pain. Ulster Med J. 1990 Oct;59(2):149-54. — View Citation

Cech, D. J., & Martin, S. T. (2012). Chapter 5 - Evaluation of Function, Activity, and Participation. In D. J. Cech & S. T. Martin (Eds.), Functional Movement Development Across the Life Span (Third Edition) (pp. 88-104). Saint Louis: W.B. Saunders.

Chan PP, Si Tou JI, Tse MM, Ng SS. Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test With a Motor Task in People With Chronic Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Nov;98(11):2213-2220. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 7. — View Citation

Cogiamanian F, Ardolino G, Vergari M, Ferrucci R, Ciocca M, Scelzo E, Barbieri S, Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 4;3:63. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00063. eCollection 2012. — View Citation

Denno MS, Gillard PJ, Graham GD, DiBonaventura MD, Goren A, Varon SF, Zorowitz R. Anxiety and depression associated with caregiver burden in caregivers of stroke survivors with spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1731-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Mar 30. — View Citation

Ertzgaard P, Alwin J, Sorbo A, Lindgren M, Sandsjo L. Evaluation of a self-administered transcutaneous electrical stimulation concept for the treatment of spasticity: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):507-517. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04791-8. Epub 2017 Oct 25. — View Citation

Farid L, Jacobs D, Do Santos J, Simon O, Gracies JM, Hutin E. FeetMe(R) Monitor-connected insoles are a valid and reliable alternative for the evaluation of gait speed after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Mar;28(2):127-134. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1792717. Epub 2020 Jul 13. — View Citation

Farrar JT, Troxel AB, Stott C, Duncombe P, Jensen MP. Validity, reliability, and clinical importance of change in a 0-10 numeric rating scale measure of spasticity: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Ther. 2008 May;30(5):974-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.011. — View Citation

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. — View Citation

Flodstrom C, Viklund Axelsson SA, Nordstrom B. A pilot study of the impact of the electro-suit Mollii(R) on body functions, activity, and participation in children with cerebral palsy. Assist Technol. 2022 Jul 4;34(4):411-417. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2020.1837288. Epub 2021 Mar 29. — View Citation

Gan SM, Tung LC, Tang YH, Wang CH. Psychometric properties of functional balance assessment in children with cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):745-53. doi: 10.1177/1545968308316474. Epub 2008 Jul 21. — View Citation

Ganapathy V, Graham GD, DiBonaventura MD, Gillard PJ, Goren A, Zorowitz RD. Caregiver burden, productivity loss, and indirect costs associated with caring for patients with poststroke spasticity. Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Nov 6;10:1793-802. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S91123. eCollection 2015. — View Citation

Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol. 1989 Jun;46(6):660-2. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520420080026. — View Citation

Golicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, Karlinska A, Kobayashi A, Janssen MF, Pickard AS. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2015 Apr;24(4):845-50. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0834-1. Epub 2014 Oct 28. — View Citation

Grassi B, Quaresima V. Near-infrared spectroscopy and skeletal muscle oxidative function in vivo in health and disease: a review from an exercise physiology perspective. J Biomed Opt. 2016 Sep;21(9):091313. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.091313. — View Citation

Gupta AD, Chu WH, Howell S, Chakraborty S, Koblar S, Visvanathan R, Cameron I, Wilson D. A systematic review: efficacy of botulinum toxin in walking and quality of life in post-stroke lower limb spasticity. Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 5;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0670-9. — View Citation

Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1. — View Citation

Johnson, M.I. (2008). Trancutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). In: Watson T, ed. Electrotherapy, Evidence based practice, 11th ed. Edinburgh:Churchill Livingstone, 253e296.

Krause P, Edrich T, Straube A. Lumbar repetitive magnetic stimulation reduces spastic tone increase of the lower limbs. Spinal Cord. 2004 Feb;42(2):67-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101564. — View Citation

Kuo, C.-L., & Hu, G.-C. (2018). Post-stroke Spasticity: A Review of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatments. Int J Gerontol. 12, 280-284.

Lance, J. (1980). "Symposium synopsis," in Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control, R. G. Feldman, R. R. Young, and W. P. Koella, Eds., pp. 485-494, Yearbook Medical, Chicago, Ill, USA.

Lecoffre C, de Peretti C, Gabet A, Grimaud O, Woimant F, Giroud M, Bejot Y, Olie V. National Trends in Patients Hospitalized for Stroke and Stroke Mortality in France, 2008 to 2014. Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):2939-2945. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017640. Epub 2017 Sep 29. — View Citation

Lerdal A, Bakken LN, Kouwenhoven SE, Pedersen G, Kirkevold M, Finset A, Kim HS. Poststroke fatigue--a review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Dec;38(6):928-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.028. — View Citation

Little WJ. The classic: Hospital for the cure of deformities: course of lectures on the deformities of the human frame. 1843. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1252-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2302-y. — View Citation

Maeda N, Urabe Y, Murakami M, Itotani K, Kato J. Discriminant analysis for predictor of falls in stroke patients by using the Berg Balance Scale. Singapore Med J. 2015 May;56(5):280-3. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015033. — View Citation

Mai J, Pedersen E. Mode of action of dantrolene sodium in spasticity. Acta Neurol Scand. 1979 Jun;59(6):309-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1979.tb02941.x. — View Citation

Malanga G, Reiter RD, Garay E. Update on tizanidine for muscle spasticity and emerging indications. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Aug;9(12):2209-15. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.12.2209. — View Citation

Markus, H. (2008). Stroke: causes and clinical features. Medicine, 36, 586-91.

McDougall J, Chow E, Harris RL, Mills PB. Near-infrared spectroscopy as a quantitative spasticity assessment tool: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2020 May 15;412:116729. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116729. Epub 2020 Feb 10. — View Citation

Meseguer-Henarejos AB, Sanchez-Meca J, Lopez-Pina JA, Carles-Hernandez R. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):576-590. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04796-7. Epub 2017 Sep 13. — View Citation

Mills PB, Dossa F. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Management of Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Apr;95(4):309-18. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000437. — View Citation

Mukherjee A, Chakravarty A. Spasticity mechanisms - for the clinician. Front Neurol. 2010 Dec 17;1:149. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2010.00149. eCollection 2010. — View Citation

Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Aug;86(8):1641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011. — View Citation

Nielsen JB, Petersen NT, Crone C, Sinkjaer T. Stretch reflex regulation in healthy subjects and patients with spasticity. Neuromodulation. 2005 Jan;8(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1094-7159.2005.05220.x. — View Citation

Nordstrom B, Prellwitz M. A pilot study of children and parents experiences of the use of a new assistive device, the electro suit Mollii. Assist Technol. 2021 Sep 3;33(5):238-245. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1579267. Epub 2019 Apr 4. — View Citation

Palisano RJ, Cameron D, Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Russell D. Stability of the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jun;48(6):424-8. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206000934. — View Citation

Palmcrantz S, Pennati GV, Bergling H, Borg J. Feasibility and potential effects of using the electro-dress Mollii on spasticity and functioning in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 10;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00740-z. — View Citation

Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood D, Van Wijck F, Burridge J, Hermens H, Johnson GR. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Jan 7-21;27(1-2):2-6. doi: 10.1080/09638280400014576. No abstract available. — View Citation

Perrot A, Castanier C, Maillot P, Zitari H. French validation of the modified-falls efficacy scale (M-FES Fr). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Sep-Oct;78:233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 4. — View Citation

Picelli A, Santamato A, Chemello E, Cinone N, Cisari C, Gandolfi M, Ranieri M, Smania N, Baricich A. Adjuvant treatments associated with botulinum toxin injection for managing spasticity: An overview of the literature. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jul;62(4):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 13. — View Citation

Rabchevsky AG, Kitzman PH. Latest approaches for the treatment of spasticity and autonomic dysreflexia in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2011 Apr;8(2):274-82. doi: 10.1007/s13311-011-0025-5. — View Citation

Ro T, Ota T, Saito T, Oikawa O. Spasticity and Range of Motion Over Time in Stroke Patients Who Received Multiple-Dose Botulinum Toxin Therapy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jan;29(1):104481. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104481. Epub 2019 Nov 4. Erratum In: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jun;29(6):104769. — View Citation

Roche N, Lackmy A, Achache V, Bussel B, Katz R. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects. J Physiol. 2011 Jun 1;589(Pt 11):2813-26. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.205161. Epub 2011 Apr 18. — View Citation

Sadowska M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Kopyta I. Cerebral Palsy: Current Opinions on Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification and Treatment Options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Jun 12;16:1505-1518. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S235165. eCollection 2020. — View Citation

Sanger TD, Delgado MR, Gaebler-Spira D, Hallett M, Mink JW; Task Force on Childhood Motor Disorders. Classification and definition of disorders causing hypertonia in childhood. Pediatrics. 2003 Jan;111(1):e89-97. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.1.e89. — View Citation

Sommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Welmer AK. Spasticity after stroke: an overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;91(9):814-20. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825f13a3. — View Citation

Stevenson T. Berg balance test. Phys Ther. 1996 Oct;76(10):1124, 1126. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.10.1124. No abstract available. — View Citation

Stinear C, Ackerley S, Byblow W. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: a systematic review. Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2039-45. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000968. Epub 2013 May 28. No abstract available. — View Citation

Tuppin P, Riviere S, Rigault A, Tala S, Drouin J, Pestel L, Denis P, Gastaldi-Menager C, Gissot C, Juilliere Y, Fagot-Campagna A. Prevalence and economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in France in 2013 according to the national health insurance scheme database. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Jun-Jul;109(6-7):399-411. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Apr 11. — View Citation

Vivancos-Matellano F, Pascual-Pascual SI, Nardi-Vilardaga J, Miquel-Rodriguez F, de Miguel-Leon I, Martinez-Garre MC, Martinez-Caballero I, Lanzas-Melendo G, Garreta-Figuera R, Garcia-Ruiz PJ, Garcia-Bach M, Garcia-Aymerich V, Bori-Fortuny I, Aguilar-Barbera M; Spanish Group on Spasticity. [Guide to the comprehensive treatment of spasticity]. Rev Neurol. 2007 Sep 16-30;45(6):365-75. Spanish. — View Citation

Wade DT. Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1989 Apr-Jun;11(2):89-92. doi: 10.3109/03790798909166398. — View Citation

Ward AB. A literature review of the pathophysiology and onset of post-stroke spasticity. Eur J Neurol. 2012 Jan;19(1):21-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03448.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27. — View Citation

WHO (2004). The atlas of heart disease and stroke / Judith Mackay and George Mensah ; with Shanthi Mendis and Kurt Greenland. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43007

WHO (2019). Accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC). Disponible sur http://www.who.int/topics/cerebrovascular_accident/fr/

Winkler T, Hering P, Straube A. Spinal DC stimulation in humans modulates post-activation depression of the H-reflex depending on current polarity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;121(6):957-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Feb 11. — View Citation

Wu D, Qian L, Zorowitz RD, Zhang L, Qu Y, Yuan Y. Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan;94(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Aug 7. — View Citation

Zawawi NSM, Aziz NA, Fisher R, Ahmad K, Walker MF. The Unmet Needs of Stroke Survivors and Stroke Caregivers: A Systematic Narrative Review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104875. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104875. Epub 2020 May 23. — View Citation

Zorowitz RD, Gillard PJ, Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity: sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3 Suppl 2):S45-52. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182764c86. — View Citation

* Note: There are 71 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)	Balance will be assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS) which has good psychometric properties in patients with stroke (concurrent validity, interrater reliability). The scale rates the balance using 56 points, with higher scores indicating better balance abilities. A score equal to or below 45 is commonly associated with risk of fall across the literature.	To be assessed at baseline.
Primary	Balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)	Balance will be assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS) which has good psychometric properties in patients with stroke (concurrent validity, interrater reliability). The scale rates the balance using 56 points, with higher scores indicating better balance abilities. A score equal to or below 45 is commonly associated with risk of fall across the literature.	To be assessed at week 2.
Primary	Balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)	Balance will be assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS) which has good psychometric properties in patients with stroke (concurrent validity, interrater reliability). The scale rates the balance using 56 points, with higher scores indicating better balance abilities. A score equal to or below 45 is commonly associated with risk of fall across the literature.	To be assessed at week 4.
Primary	Balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)	Balance will be assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS) which has good psychometric properties in patients with stroke (concurrent validity, interrater reliability). The scale rates the balance using 56 points, with higher scores indicating better balance abilities. A score equal to or below 45 is commonly associated with risk of fall across the literature.	To be assessed at week 8.
Secondary	Visual Analog Score for spasticity.	Spasticity will be measured using a visual analog score from 0 to 10, 0 being no spasticity and 10 being the worst possible spasticity.	This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, week 4 and week 8.
Secondary	Visual Analog Score for pain.	Pain will be measured using a visual analog score from 0 to 10, 0 being no pain, to 10 being the worst possible pain.	This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, week 4 and week 8.
Secondary	EQ-5D-5L: EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Quality of Life Questionnaire		Two weeks after the second stimulation and 4 weeks later at the end of phase 2.
Secondary	Overall Clinical improvement	Evaluation of overall Clinical improvement will be done using the 7-point Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Patient will fill a questionnaire that will address their clinical situation as follows: Very much improved. Much improved. Slightly improved. No change. Slightly worse. Much worse. Very much worse.; The score will range from 1-7, 1 being the best clinical outcome and 7 the worst.	This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, and week 8.
Secondary	Blinding Questionnaire	Evaluation of patient's blinding to the type of stimulation in the crossover trial periods using a dedicated questionnaire. Patients will be asked whether they think they received the sham or active stimulation.; No scale will be used for this measure.	This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2.
Secondary	Visual Analog Score for fatigue	Fatigue will be measured using a visual analog score from 0 to 10, 0 being no fatigue, to 10 being the worst possible fatigue.	This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, week 4 and week 8.
Secondary	Muscle tone.	Muscle tone will be evaluated by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Scores will range from 0 to 4, 0 being no increase or normal muscle tone, to 4 being rigidity in flexion or extension of muscles.	This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, week 4 and week 8.
Secondary	Fall Risk	Fall risk will be assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International scale. It is a 16-item scale, including a range of functional activities, that assesses the perceived risk of falling, using a score that will range from 1 to 4, 1 being not at all concerned to 4 being very concerned.; Items are summed to a total score that will range from a minimum of 16 (no concern about falling) to a maximum of 64 (severe concern about falling).	Two weeks after the second stimulation and 4 weeks later at the end of phase 2.
Secondary	Weight	The patient weight will be measured and recorded in kilograms.	Baseline.
Secondary	Height	The patient height will be measured and recorded in centimeters.	Baseline
Secondary	Time Up and Go (TUG)	Patients have to stand up from a chair when they hear the verbal instruction "go", walk a distance of 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down. Timing starts with the verbal instruction "go' and stops when the patients return to the seated position. The score consists of the time taken to complete the test activity, measured in seconds.	This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, week 4 and week 8.
Secondary	Body Mass Index (BMI)	The weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2. BMI of 35 kg/m^2 or more will be used as an exclusion criterion for the study.	Baseline