Stroke Clinical Trial
— REAL-mOfficial title:
Robotic Exosuit Augmented Locomotion (REAL) in the Clinic and Community - a Mechanistic Clinical Trial
| NCT number | NCT05315310 |
| Other study ID # | 5520-m |
| Secondary ID | |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Phase | N/A |
| First received | |
| Last updated | |
| Start date | March 14, 2022 |
| Est. completion date | August 1, 2023 |
Previous studies of the exosuit technology have culminated in strong evidence for the gait-restorative effects of soft robotic exosuits for patients post-stroke by means of substitution for lost function. The present study builds on this work by suggesting that an exosuit's immediate gait-restorative effects can be leveraged during high intensity gait training to produce long-lasting gait restoration. Current gait training efforts are focused on either quality or intensity. They focus on gait quality often by reducing the training intensity to allow patients to achieve a more normal gait. In contrast, efforts focused on training intensity push participants without focusing on the quality of their movements. These intervention paradigms generally fail to substantially impact community mobility. In this study, the investigators posit that exosuits can uniquely enable an integration of these paradigms (ie, high intensity gait training that promotes quality of movements). For this protocol, exosuits developed in collaboration with an industry partner, ReWalk™ Robotics will be used. To evaluate the effects of REAL gait training, the investigators will use clinical measures of motor and gait function, locomotor mechanics and energetics, and physiologic measures that may infer on motor learning. The spectrum of behavioral and physiologic data that we will collect will enable us to understand more comprehensively the gait-restorative effects of REAL. This study is a single-arm mechanistic clinical trial that will examine clinical and physiological factors that determine response to the intervention. This study will assist in informing best candidates and outcomes for future randomized controlled trials.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 25 |
| Est. completion date | August 1, 2023 |
| Est. primary completion date | July 1, 2023 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age 18 - 80 years old - Stroke event occurred at least 6 months ago - Observable gait deficits - Gait speed equal to or less than 1 m/s - Able to walk without the support of another person for at least 6 minutes (may use an assistive device as needed, but without use of an ankle foot orthosis or brace) - Passive ankle dorsiflexion range of motion to neutral with the knee extended (i.e., able to achieve an angle of 90 degrees between the shank and the foot) - Resting heart rate between 40 - 100 bpm, inclusive - Resting blood pressure between 90/60 and 170/90 mmHg, inclusive Exclusion Criteria: - Score of >1 on question 1b and >0 on question 1c on the NIH Stroke Scale - Inability to communicate with investigators - Neglect or hemianopia - Actively receiving physical therapy for walking - History of cerebellar strokes - Known recurring or repeating strokes - Unexplained dizziness in the last 6 months - Pressure ulcers or skin wounds located at human-device interface sites - Other medical, orthopedic, and neurological conditions that prevent full participation in the research |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Boston University | Boston | Massachusetts |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Boston University Charles River Campus | Harvard University, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital |
United States,
Ardestani MM, Henderson CE, Hornby TG. Improved walking function in laboratory does not guarantee increased community walking in stroke survivors: Potential role of gait biomechanics. J Biomech. 2019 Jun 25;91:151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 17. — View Citation
Ardestani MM, Kinnaird CR, Henderson CE, Hornby TG. Compensation or Recovery? Altered Kinetics and Neuromuscular Synergies Following High-Intensity Stepping Training Poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019 Jan;33(1):47-58. doi: 10.1177/1545968318817825. Epub 2018 Dec 29. — View Citation
Awad LN, Bae J, Kudzia P, Long A, Hendron K, Holt KG, O'Donnell K, Ellis TD, Walsh CJ. Reducing Circumduction and Hip Hiking During Hemiparetic Walking Through Targeted Assistance of the Paretic Limb Using a Soft Robotic Exosuit. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;96(10 Suppl 1):S157-S164. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000800. — View Citation
Awad LN, Bae J, O'Donnell K, De Rossi SMM, Hendron K, Sloot LH, Kudzia P, Allen S, Holt KG, Ellis TD, Walsh CJ. A soft robotic exosuit improves walking in patients after stroke. Sci Transl Med. 2017 Jul 26;9(400):eaai9084. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9084. — View Citation
Awad LN, Bae J, O'Donnell K, et al. Soft exosuits increase walking speed and distance after stroke. In: International Symposium on Wearable Robotics and Rehabilitation (WeRob). Houston, TX: IEEE; 2; 2017.
Awad LN, Kudzia P, Revi DA, Ellis TD, Walsh CJ. Walking faster and farther with a soft robotic exosuit: Implications for post-stroke gait assistance and rehabilitation. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2020;1:108-115. doi: 10.1109/ojemb.2020.2984429. Epub 2020 Apr 2. — View Citation
Bae J, Awad LN, Long A, O'Donnell K, Hendron K, Holt KG, Ellis TD, Walsh CJ. Biomechanical mechanisms underlying exosuit-induced improvements in walking economy after stroke. J Exp Biol. 2018 Mar 7;221(Pt 5):jeb168815. doi: 10.1242/jeb.168815. — View Citation
Bae J, Siviy C, Rouleau M, et al. A lightweight and efficient portable soft exosuit for paretic ankle assistance in walking after stroke. Proc - IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. 2018:2820-2827. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2018.8461046
Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke. 2006 Mar;37(3):872-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204063.75779.8d. Epub 2006 Feb 2. — View Citation
Dobkin BH. Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(3):197-206. doi: 10.1177/1545968309331863. — View Citation
Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT, Schaffrin A, Baake P, Malezic M, Mauritz KH. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):976-81. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.6.976. — View Citation
Holleran CL, Straube DD, Kinnaird CR, Leddy AL, Hornby TG. Feasibility and potential efficacy of high-intensity stepping training in variable contexts in subacute and chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):643-51. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521001. Epub 2014 Feb 10. — View Citation
Paci M. Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies. J Rehabil Med. 2003 Jan;35(1):2-7. doi: 10.1080/16501970306106. — View Citation
Porciuncula F, Arumukhom Revi D, Baker TC, et al. Speed-Based Gait Training with Soft Robotic Exosuits Improves Walking after Stroke: A Crossover Pilot Study. In: American Physical Therapy Association Combined Sections Meeting. ; 2021.
Porciuncula F, Baker TC, Arumukhom Revi D, Bae J, Sloutsky R, Ellis TD, Walsh CJ, Awad LN. Targeting Paretic Propulsion and Walking Speed With a Soft Robotic Exosuit: A Consideration-of-Concept Trial. Front Neurorobot. 2021 Jul 28;15:689577. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.689577. eCollection 2021. — View Citation
Porciuncula F, Baker TC, Arumukhom Revi D, et al. Soft robotic exosuits for targeted gait rehabilitation after stroke: A case study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(12):1082-1083.
Roelker SA, Bowden MG, Kautz SA, Neptune RR. Paretic propulsion as a measure of walking performance and functional motor recovery post-stroke: A review. Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.027. Epub 2018 Oct 25. — View Citation
* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | This is test of long-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to "cover as much distance as they safely can" for 6 minutes, and total distance is the main metric from this test. This will be performed without wearing the soft exosuit (No Suit) regardless of intervention. | Baseline (Pre-training Evaluation) | |
| Primary | 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | This is test of long-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to "cover as much distance as they safely can" for 6 minutes, and total distance is the main metric from this test. This will be performed without wearing the soft exosuit (No Suit) regardless of intervention. | Post-training Evaluation (up to 6 weeks) | |
| Primary | 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | This is test of long-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to "cover as much distance as they safely can" for 6 minutes, and total distance is the main metric from this test. This will be performed without wearing the soft exosuit (No Suit) regardless of intervention. | Retention Evaluation (up to 4 weeks post-washout) | |
| Primary | 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at comfortable walking speed (CWS) and maximum walking speed (MWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway. | Baseline (Pre-training Evaluation) | |
| Primary | 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at comfortable walking speed (CWS) and maximum walking speed (MWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway. | Post-training Evaluation (up to 6 weeks) | |
| Primary | 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) | This is a test of short-distance walking function. The participant will be asked to walk at comfortable walking speed (CWS) and maximum walking speed (MWS) on a ten-meter straight walkway. | Retention Evaluation (up to 4 weeks post-washout) | |
| Primary | Forward propulsion | Forward propulsion refers to anterior component of the ground reaction forces that correspond to push-off subtask of the gait cycle. | Baseline (Pre-training Evaluation) | |
| Primary | Forward propulsion | Forward propulsion refers to anterior component of the ground reaction forces that correspond to push-off subtask of the gait cycle. | Post-training Evaluation (up to 6 weeks) | |
| Primary | Forward propulsion | Forward propulsion refers to anterior component of the ground reaction forces that correspond to push-off subtask of the gait cycle. | Retention Evaluation (up to 4 weeks post-washout) | |
| Secondary | Muscle Synergies | Muscle synergies refers to the coordinated co-activation of muscles during walking. Electromyography data will be collected bilaterally from up to 12 lower-limb muscles during treadmill walking with and without the exosuit. The number, timing, and composition of muscle synergies will be calculated using standard non-negative matrix factorization techniques. | Baseline (Pre-training Evaluation) | |
| Secondary | Dynamic Motor Control Index | The dynamic motor control index is a continuous summary metric of muscle co-activations during walking. Electromyography data will be collected bilaterally from up to 12 lower-limb muscles during treadmill walking with and without the exosuit. Using non-negative matrix factorization, the variability accounted for by the one-muscle synergy solution is converted into a z-score centered around 100. A value of 100 indicates neuromuscular control similar to neuro-typical adults and each 10-point deviation represents a difference of one-standard deviation from neuro-typical adults. | Baseline (Pre-training Evaluation) | |
| Secondary | Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Lower Extremity Subsection | The Fugl-Meyer Assessment is a multi-item Likert-type scale that evaluates motor recovery from hemiplegic stroke. Items are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0=cannot perform; 1=performs partially; 2=performs fully). The Lower Extremity Subsection has a total of 34 points, with higher score indicate of lesser impairment. | Baseline (Clinical Screening) |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT04043052 -
Mobile Technologies and Post-stroke Depression
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03869138 -
Alternative Therapies for Improving Physical Function in Individuals With Stroke
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04101695 -
Hemodynamic Response of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Cerebellar Hemisphere in Healthy Subjects
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04034069 -
Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT03052712 -
Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT00391378 -
Cerebral Lesions and Outcome After Cardiac Surgery (CLOCS)
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06204744 -
Home-based Arm and Hand Exercise Program for Stroke: A Multisite Trial
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT06043167 -
Clinimetric Application of FOUR Scale as in Treatment and Rehabilitation of Patients With Acute Cerebral Injury
|
||
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04535479 -
Dry Needling for Spasticity in Stroke
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03985761 -
Utilizing Gaming Mechanics to Optimize Telerehabilitation Adherence in Persons With Stroke
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT00859885 -
International PFO Consortium
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06034119 -
Effects of Voluntary Adjustments During Walking in Participants Post-stroke
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03622411 -
Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Chronic Phase
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01662960 -
Visual Feedback Therapy for Treating Individuals With Hemiparesis Following Stroke
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05854485 -
Robot-Aided Assessment and Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Function After Stroke
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05520528 -
Impact of Group Participation on Adults With Aphasia
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03366129 -
Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in People With White Matter Hyperintensities Who Have Had a Stroke
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03281590 -
Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05805748 -
Serious Game Therapy in Neglect Patients
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05993221 -
Deconstructing Post Stroke Hemiparesis
|