Stroke Clinical Trial
Official title:
Dynamic Lycra Orthosis as an Adjunct to Botulinum Toxin-A Injection of the Upper Limb in Adults Following Stroke: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Verified date | June 2018 |
Source | Marmara University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Upper extremity splints are one of the nonpharmacologic treatments used to treat
hypertonicity after stroke. The purpose of splinting is to support, to position, to
immobilize, to prevent contracture and deformities, to reduce spasticity and to enhance
function. Dynamic lycra splints have been found to improve spasticity, posture, and fluency
of upper extremity movements in computerized analysis systems due to the effects of neutral
warmth, circumferential pressure and by creating a low intensity prolonged stretch on
hypertonic muscles , all of which contribute to increased sensory awareness of the involved
limb. These splints are frequently used in the field of neurological rehabilitation, but
there is not enough scientific evidence about their efficacy. It was demonstrated that lycra
sleeves have positive effects on upper extremity function of children with cerebral palsy.
Lycra sleeves for upper extremity function after stroke is a relatively new field of
research.
The aim of this study is to investigate effects of dynamic lycra orthosis as an adjunct to
botulinum toxin-a injection of the upper limb in adults following stroke.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | February 11, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | February 11, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult stroke (18-80 years) 2. Patients with stroke who can sit without support 3. Patients with stroke who have spasticity which limit upper limb function Exclusion Criteria: 1. Brunnstrom motor recovery stage 1 and 6 2. Comorbidities such as hemiplegic shoulder pain, complex regional pain syndrome, central post-stroke pain, brachial plexus injury etc. 3. Upper limb spasticity with MAS level 4 or presence of contracture in upper extremity. 4. Contraindications for lycra sleeve ( circulatory disorder etc.) 5. Contraindications for botulinum toxin (infection at the injection site, hypersensitivity to toxin etc.) 6. Severe aphasia or cognitive dysfunction that limit participation in rehabilitation (7) Receiving botulinum toxin injection within the last 6 months |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Esra Giray | Istanbul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Marmara University |
Turkey,
Elliott C, Reid S, Hamer P, Alderson J, Elliott B. Lycra(®) arm splints improve movement fluency in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2011 Feb;33(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 4. — View Citation
Elliott CM, Reid SL, Alderson JA, Elliott BC. Lycra arm splints in conjunction with goal-directed training can improve movement in children with cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(1):47-54. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0631. — View Citation
Gracies JM, Fitzpatrick R, Wilson L, Burke D, Gandevia SC. Lycra garments designed for patients with upper limb spasticity: mechanical effects in normal subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Oct;78(10):1066-71. — View Citation
Gracies JM, Marosszeky JE, Renton R, Sandanam J, Gandevia SC, Burke D. Short-term effects of dynamic lycra splints on upper limb in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Dec;81(12):1547-55. — View Citation
Nicholson JH, Morton RE, Attfield S, Rennie D. Assessment of upper-limb function and movement in children with cerebral palsy wearing lycra garments. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Jun;43(6):384-91. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale | Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment assesses motor impairment in the upper extremities. There is no total score for this measure. Sub-scales include: upper extremity (0-36), wrist (0-10), hand (0-14), coordination/speed (0-6) (which can be combined to form a total motor function score out of 66). Higher scores indicate better performance. | Day 0 | |
Primary | Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale | Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment assesses motor impairment in the upper extremities. There is no total score for this measure. Sub-scales include: upper extremity (0-36), wrist (0-10), hand (0-14), coordination/speed (0-6) (which can be combined to form a total motor function score out of 66). Higher scores indicate better performance. | 3 weeks | |
Primary | Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale | Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment assesses motor impairment in the upper extremities. There is no total score for this measure. Sub-scales include: upper extremity (0-36), wrist (0-10), hand (0-14), coordination/speed (0-6) (which can be combined to form a total motor function score out of 66). Higher scores indicate better performance. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Motricity Index Upper Limb | Upper limb motor function Resistance to pinch, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction are scored to a maximum score of 33. Section scores are summed to a total of 100. 0 = No movement. 9 = Palpable contraction in muscle but no movement. 14 = Movement seen but not full range/ not against gravity. 19 = Full range against gravity, not against resistance. 25 = Movement against resistance but weaker than other side. 33 = Normal power. |
Day 0 | |
Secondary | Motricity Index Upper Limb | Upper limb motor function Resistance to pinch, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction are scored to a maximum score of 33. Section scores are summed to a total of 100. 0 = No movement. 9 = Palpable contraction in muscle but no movement. 14 = Movement seen but not full range/ not against gravity. 19 = Full range against gravity, not against resistance. 25 = Movement against resistance but weaker than other side. 33 = Normal power. |
3 weeks | |
Secondary | Motricity Index Upper Limb | Upper limb motor function Resistance to pinch, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction are scored to a maximum score of 33. Section scores are summed to a total of 100. 0 = No movement. 9 = Palpable contraction in muscle but no movement. 14 = Movement seen but not full range/ not against gravity. 19 = Full range against gravity, not against resistance. 25 = Movement against resistance but weaker than other side. 33 = Normal power. |
3 months | |
Secondary | Box and Block Test (BBT) | Evaluates gross manuel dexterity. Box and Block Test which consists of a box divided into two compartments by a partition and blocks with standardized dimensions is used to assess unilateral gross manuel dexterity. The object is instructed to transport boxes one by one from one compartment of the box to other in 60 seconds. The object should sit on a chair with a standard height and face the box. He/she should practice for a 15 second trial period before testing. If two blocks are carried at the same time, it is counted as one. And also if the block falls on the floor after it has been carried across, it is still counted. The score is the number of boxes transferred from one compartment to other in 60 seconds. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Box and Block Test (BBT) | Evaluates gross manuel dexterity. Box and Block Test which consists of a box divided into two compartments by a partition and blocks with standardized dimensions is used to assess unilateral gross manuel dexterity. The object is instructed to transport boxes one by one from one compartment of the box to other in 60 seconds. The object should sit on a chair with a standard height and face the box. He/she should practice for a 15 second trial period before testing. If two blocks are carried at the same time, it is counted as one. And also if the block falls on the floor after it has been carried across, it is still counted. The score is the number of boxes transferred from one compartment to other in 60 seconds. | 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Box and Block Test (BBT) | Evaluates gross manuel dexterity. Box and Block Test which consists of a box divided into two compartments by a partition and blocks with standardized dimensions is used to assess unilateral gross manuel dexterity. The object is instructed to transport boxes one by one from one compartment of the box to other in 60 seconds. The object should sit on a chair with a standard height and face the box. He/she should practice for a 15 second trial period before testing. If two blocks are carried at the same time, it is counted as one. And also if the block falls on the floor after it has been carried across, it is still counted. The score is the number of boxes transferred from one compartment to other in 60 seconds. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 1 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 2 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 4 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 5 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 1 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 2 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 4 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 5 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 1 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 2 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 4 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for sensory functions digit 5 | Assess touch detection thresholds of the fingers. 5 filaments from 0.07 gram to 279 grams will be used. Five different positions of the hand are tested: fingertip on digit 1,2,4 and 5. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of elbow flexor | elbow flexor muscle tone 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the range of motion (ROM) 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension |
Day 0 | |
Secondary | Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of wrist flexor | wrist flexor muscle tone 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension |
Day 0 | |
Secondary | Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of elbow flexor | elbow flexor muscle tone 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension |
3 weeks | |
Secondary | Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of wrist flexor | wrist flexor muscle tone 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension |
3 weeks | |
Secondary | Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of elbow flexor | elbow flexor muscle tone 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension |
3 months | |
Secondary | Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of wrist flexor | wrist flexor muscle tone 0 (0) - No increase in muscle tone 1 (1) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ (2) - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2 (3) - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affect part(s) easily moved 3 (4) - Considerable increase in muscle tone passive, movement difficult 4 (5) - Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension |
3 months | |
Secondary | Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 (SIS 3.0) | The SIS 3.0 is a stroke-specific instrument of health-related quality of life. It contains 59 items measuring 8 domains (i.e., strength, hand function, activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion. memory and thinking and participation) with a single item assessing perceived overall recovery from stroke. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with lower scores indicating greater difficulty in task completion during the past week. | Day 0 | |
Secondary | Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 (SIS 3.0) | The SIS 3.0 is a stroke-specific instrument of health-related quality of life. It contains 59 items measuring 8 domains (i.e., strength, hand function, activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion. memory and thinking and participation) with a single item assessing perceived overall recovery from stroke. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with lower scores indicating greater difficulty in task completion during the past week. | 3 weeks | |
Secondary | Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 (SIS 3.0) | The SIS 3.0 is a stroke-specific instrument of health-related quality of life. It contains 59 items measuring 8 domains (i.e., strength, hand function, activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living, mobility, communication, emotion. memory and thinking and participation) with a single item assessing perceived overall recovery from stroke. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with lower scores indicating greater difficulty in task completion during the past week. | 3 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04043052 -
Mobile Technologies and Post-stroke Depression
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03869138 -
Alternative Therapies for Improving Physical Function in Individuals With Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04101695 -
Hemodynamic Response of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Cerebellar Hemisphere in Healthy Subjects
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04034069 -
Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03052712 -
Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00391378 -
Cerebral Lesions and Outcome After Cardiac Surgery (CLOCS)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06204744 -
Home-based Arm and Hand Exercise Program for Stroke: A Multisite Trial
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06043167 -
Clinimetric Application of FOUR Scale as in Treatment and Rehabilitation of Patients With Acute Cerebral Injury
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04535479 -
Dry Needling for Spasticity in Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03985761 -
Utilizing Gaming Mechanics to Optimize Telerehabilitation Adherence in Persons With Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00859885 -
International PFO Consortium
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06034119 -
Effects of Voluntary Adjustments During Walking in Participants Post-stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03622411 -
Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Chronic Phase
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01662960 -
Visual Feedback Therapy for Treating Individuals With Hemiparesis Following Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05854485 -
Robot-Aided Assessment and Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Function After Stroke
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05520528 -
Impact of Group Participation on Adults With Aphasia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03366129 -
Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in People With White Matter Hyperintensities Who Have Had a Stroke
|
||
Completed |
NCT03281590 -
Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry
|
||
Completed |
NCT05805748 -
Serious Game Therapy in Neglect Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05993221 -
Deconstructing Post Stroke Hemiparesis
|