Conivaptan for the Reduction of Cerebral Edema in Intracerebral Hemorrhage- A Safety and Tolerability Study

Stroke Clinical Trial

Official title:

Conivaptan for the Reduction of Cerebral Edema in Intracerebral Hemorrhage- A Safety and Tolerability Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03000283
• Other study ID #: NSJC-1601
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 1
• Start date: March 22, 2017
• Est. completion date: April 15, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: April 2020
• Source: Allina Health System
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this study is to preliminarily determine/estimate feasibility and whether frequent and early conivaptan use, at a dose currently determined to be safe (i.e., 40mg/day), is safe and well-tolerated in patients with cerebral edema from intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and pressure (ICP). A further goal is to preliminarily estimate whether conivaptan at this same dose can reduce cerebral edema (CE) in these same patients. This study is also an essential first step in understanding the role of conivaptan in CE management.

Hypothesis: The frequent and early use of conivaptan at 40mg/day will be safe and well-tolerated, and also reduce cerebral edema, in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and pressure.

Description:

This is a single-center, open-label, safety and tolerability study. Based on findings in the literature from both animal research and clinical observations with ICH (intracerebral hemorrhage) associated with TBI (traumatic brain injury), this study will begin to look at the safety, tolerability, as well as potential effectiveness, of conivaptan to reduce CE (cerebral edema) in patients with non-traumatic ICH.

The seven patients in this study will receive 40mg/day of the study medication conivaptan. In this early phase study, our focus will be to assess the safety and tolerability of this medication. The available clinical data on conivaptan in the neurocritical care population suggest the potential harm is negligible. Data in TBI patients demonstrate conivaptan is safe and well tolerated using a single dose (20mg) to increase Na+ in a controlled fashion to reduce ICP. Previous work has demonstrated the safety and tolerability of conivaptan, in doses ranging from 20-80mg/day, in the neurocritical care population. Conivaptan has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in lowering ICP, and increasing serum sodium, in the neurocritical care population. Also noted have been improvements in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and stable blood pressure, and a prolonged reduction in ICP. Finally, the method of intermittent bolus dosing of conivaptan is equally effective in raising and maintaining serum sodium in the neurocritical care population as continuous infusion, with potentially less risk of adverse reactions including phlebitis.

Conivaptan, a non-selective Arginine-Vasopressin (AVP) V1A/V2 antagonist that reduces aquaporin 4 production and promotes aquaresis, is approved for the treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. The exact cause of the observed reduction in ICP with conivaptan is uncertain. However, the mechanism most likely represents a combination of an acute pure aquaresis, removing free water from brain tissue, and a sustained down regulation of aquaporin 4 to abate/slow development of CE. The V2 antagonism of conivaptan promotes free water loss, and the V1 antagonism may improve cerebral blood flow (CBF) and reduce blood brain barrier permeability. Notably, serum sodium tends to correlate inversely with both ICP and CE. The early use of conivaptan could potentially be used clinically to reduce CE by these means.

It is with this in mind, the research team feels justified in pursuing this study with the hopes that the data obtained will lead to potential good and removal of harm in future patients with this devastating disease. Given the enormous costs of ICH, problems with current therapies, and variability in treatment, there is an urgent need to identify a therapy that has a better safety and effectiveness profile compared to the currently used agents. This study will use a dose (40mg/day) currently approved. Further, given that the primary purpose of the use of this medication in this study is not to correct hyponatremia, an investigational new drug (IND) application to the FDA was submitted, and the study was determined exempt.

Our central hypothesis is that through reductions in aquaporin-4 (AQP4) expression, the early use of conivaptan will reduce CE while also being safe to the patient. Our long term goal is to show that early use of conivaptan in ICH will reduce CE. If this reduction is possible, we hypothesize improved outcome and reducing the need for rescue therapies, ICU length of stay, and overall treatment cost will follow. However, more data is needed to evaluate the dosing and amount of drug. With respect to conivaptan's efficacy in correction of hyponatremia, a direct dose-response relationship exists. Further, this effect was more noted at milder degrees of hyponatremia.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 7
• Est. completion date: April 15, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: February 12, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 19 Years to 79 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age >18 years old and < 80 years.

2. Diagnosis of primary ICH > 20 cc in volume.

3. Enrollment within 48 hours from initial symptoms.

4. Signed informed consent from the patient or obtained via their legally authorized representative (if the patient is not able to sign the informed consent themselves). The patient's decisional capacity to either provide or refuse consent will be determined using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), which is being assessed at baseline and at 24 hours (+/-6hrs) after enrollment. A potential study participant with a GCS > 14 will be asked to provide their own initial study consent. A GCS = 14 would indicate the need to pursue consent via legally authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Current need for renal replacement therapy (RRT).

2. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <30 mL/minute at time of admission.

3. Participation in another study for ICH or intraventricular hemorrhage.

4. ICH related to infection, thrombolysis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, trauma or tumor.

5. Presence of HIV or active fungal infection that is known based on information in the electronic medical record (EMR).

6. Continued use of digoxin or amlodipine (as recommended by the manufacturer due to cytochrome P450 3A4 "CYP3A" inhibition).

7. Active hepatic failure as defined by aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >160 units/L and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) >180 units/L, or total bilirubin levels greater than four times normal levels (>4.8mg/dL).

8. Serum Na+> 145 mmol/L (admission labs or any time prior to recruitment/enrollment).

9. Unable to receive conivaptan based on contraindications indicated by the manufacturer.

10. Pregnant or lactating females.

11. Not expected to survive within 48 hours of admission, or a presumed diagnosis of brain death.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Brain Edema
• Cerebral Edema
• Cerebral Hemorrhage
• Edema
• Hemorrhage
• Intracerebral Hemorrhage
• Stroke

Intervention

Drug:
• Conivaptan
Patients will receive 20mg IV of the study drug every 12 hours equaling 40mg/day over 2 days (4 doses total), in addition to the standardized ICH management targets using the PI's version of standardized ICH management targets.Usual standard of care can include sedation and analgesia as needed, elevation of the head of the bed, mannitol and/or saline as needed to reduce ICP, and temperature control with antipyretics such as acetaminophen. The conivaptan bolus (20mg), which is premixed with 100ml of 5% dextrose in water, is infused (peripherally) over 30 minutes, most commonly through an already placed central line.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	United Hospital	Saint Paul	Minnesota

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Jesse Corry

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (51)

Adams Jr HP. Handbook of Cerebrovascular Disease. Ed.2 Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, 2005

Annane D, Decaux G, Smith N; Conivaptan Study Group. Efficacy and safety of oral conivaptan, a vasopressin-receptor antagonist, evaluated in a randomized, controlled trial in patients with euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia. Am J Med Sci. 2009 Jan;337(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31817b8148. — View Citation

Bulger EM, May S, Brasel KJ, Schreiber M, Kerby JD, Tisherman SA, Newgard C, Slutsky A, Coimbra R, Emerson S, Minei JP, Bardarson B, Kudenchuk P, Baker A, Christenson J, Idris A, Davis D, Fabian TC, Aufderheide TP, Callaway C, Williams C, Banek J, Vaillancourt C, van Heest R, Sopko G, Hata JS, Hoyt DB; ROC Investigators. Out-of-hospital hypertonic resuscitation following severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Oct 6;304(13):1455-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1405. — View Citation

Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, Barber J, Machamer J, Chaddock K, Celix JM, Cherner M, Hendrix T; Global Neurotrauma Research Group. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2471-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207363. Epub 2012 Dec 12. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 19;369(25):2465. — View Citation

Corry JJ, Varelas P, Abdelhak T, Morris S, Hawley M, Hawkins A, Jankowski M. Variable change in renal function by hypertonic saline. World J Crit Care Med. 2014 May 4;3(2):61-7. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i2.61. eCollection 2014 May 4. — View Citation

Corry JJ. The use of targeted temperature management for elevated intracranial pressure. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014 Jun;14(6):453. doi: 10.1007/s11910-014-0453-9. Review. — View Citation

Corry JJ. Use of hypothermia in the intensive care unit. World J Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug 4;1(4):106-22. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v1.i4.106. eCollection 2012 Aug 4. Review. — View Citation

Costello-Boerrigter LC, Boerrigter G, Burnett JC Jr. Pharmacology of vasopressin antagonists. Heart Fail Rev. 2009 Jun;14(2):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s10741-008-9108-8. Epub 2008 Sep 3. Review. — View Citation

Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vaprisol ® (conivaptan hydrochloride injection) [package insert]. Nashville, TN, April 2014.

Dhar R, Murphy-Human T. A bolus of conivaptan lowers intracranial pressure in a patient with hyponatremia after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011 Feb;14(1):97-102. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9366-x. — View Citation

Diringer MN, Edwards DF. Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical intensive care unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;29(3):635-40. — View Citation

FDA. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/drugshortages/ucm050792.htm (2010)

Fernández N, Martínez MA, García-Villalón AL, Monge L, Diéguez G. Cerebral vasoconstriction produced by vasopressin in conscious goats: role of vasopressin V(1) and V(2) receptors and nitric oxide. Br J Pharmacol. 2001 Apr;132(8):1837-44. — View Citation

Galton C, Deem S, Yanez ND, Souter M, Chesnut R, Dagal A, Treggiari M. Open-label randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of a single dose conivaptan to raise serum sodium in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011 Jun;14(3):354-60. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9525-8. — View Citation

Gazitúa S, Scott JB, Chou CC, Haddy FJ. Effect of osmolarity on canine renal vascular resistance. Am J Physiol. 1969 Oct;217(4):1216-23. — View Citation

Gebel JM Jr, Jauch EC, Brott TG, Khoury J, Sauerbeck L, Salisbury S, Spilker J, Tomsick TA, Duldner J, Broderick JP. Natural history of perihematomal edema in patients with hyperacute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2002 Nov;33(11):2631-5. — View Citation

Grände PO, Romner B. Osmotherapy in brain edema: a questionable therapy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012 Oct;24(4):407-12. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000419730.29492.8b. Review. — View Citation

Hays A, Lazaridid C, et al. Osmotherapy in clinical practice: A survey of practitioners. Abstract Supplement. Volume 13. Neurocritical Care. 2010.

Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001 Apr;32(4):891-7. — View Citation

Kleindienst A, Fazzina G, Dunbar JG, Glisson R, Marmarou A. Protective effect of the V1a receptor antagonist SR49059 on brain edema formation following middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;96:303-6. — View Citation

Li YH, Sun SQ. [Expression of aquaporin - 4 protein in brain from rats with hemorrhagic edema]. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2003 Sep;15(9):538-41. Chinese. — View Citation

Liu X, Nakayama S, Amiry-Moghaddam M, Ottersen OP, Bhardwaj A. Arginine-vasopressin V1 but not V2 receptor antagonism modulates infarct volume, brain water content, and aquaporin-4 expression following experimental stroke. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Feb;12(1):124-31. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9277-x. — View Citation

Marik PE, Rivera R. Therapeutic effect of conivaptan bolus dosing in hyponatremic neurosurgical patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jan;33(1):51-5. doi: 10.1002/phar.1169. — View Citation

Mayer SA, Sacco RL, Shi T, Mohr JP. Neurologic deterioration in noncomatose patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 1994 Aug;44(8):1379-84. — View Citation

McGraw CP, Howard G. Effect of mannitol on increased intracranial pressure. Neurosurgery. 1983 Sep;13(3):269-71. — View Citation

Migliati ER, Amiry-Moghaddam M, Froehner SC, Adams ME, Ottersen OP, Bhardwaj A. Na(+)-K (+)-2Cl (-) cotransport inhibitor attenuates cerebral edema following experimental stroke via the perivascular pool of aquaporin-4. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Aug;13(1):123-31. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9376-8. — View Citation

Murphy T, Dhar R, Diringer M. Conivaptan bolus dosing for the correction of hyponatremia in the neurointensive care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(1):14-9. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9179-3. Epub 2009 Jan 4. — View Citation

Naidech AM, Paparello J, Liebling SM, Bassin SL, Levasseur K, Alberts MJ, Bernstein RA, Muro K. Use of Conivaptan (Vaprisol) for hyponatremic neuro-ICU patients. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Aug;13(1):57-61. doi: 10.1007/s12028-010-9379-5. Erratum in: Neurocrit Care. 2011 Aug;15(1):210. Leibling, Storm M [corrected to Liebling, Storm M]. — View Citation

Nathan BR. Cerebral correlates of hyponatremia. Neurocrit Care. 2007;6(1):72-8. — View Citation

National PBM Drug Monograph. Conivaptan Hydrochloride Injection (Vaprisol). 2006. [Appendix 6]

Nau R, Desel H, Lassek C, Thiel A, Schinschke S, Rössing R, Kolenda H, Prange HW. Slow elimination of mannitol from human cerebrospinal fluid. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;53(3-4):271-4. — View Citation

Onuoho A, Human T, Dringer MN, Dhar R. Predictors of the Response to a Bolus of Conivaptan in Patients with Acute Hyponatremia. Abstract Supplement. Volume 13. Neurocritical Care. 2010.

Rosenberg GA, Scremin O, Estrada E, Kyner WT. Arginine vasopressin V1-antagonist and atrial natriuretic peptide reduce hemorrhagic brain edema in rats. Stroke. 1992 Dec;23(12):1767-73; discussion 1773-4. Erratum in: Stroke 1993 Jun;24(6):913. — View Citation

Ross WD. The right and the good. Hackett Pub Co Inc (July 1988). ISBN-13: 978-0872200586.

Sheth KN, Kimberly WT, Elm JJ, Kent TA, Mandava P, Yoo AJ, Thomalla G, Campbell B, Donnan GA, Davis SM, Albers GW, Jacobson S, Simard JM, Stern BJ. Pilot study of intravenous glyburide in patients with a large ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):281-3. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003352. Epub 2013 Nov 5. — View Citation

Strandvik GF. Hypertonic saline in critical care: a review of the literature and guidelines for use in hypotensive states and raised intracranial pressure. Anaesthesia. 2009 Sep;64(9):990-1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05986.x. Review. — View Citation

Sun Z, Zhao Z, Zhao S, Sheng Y, Zhao Z, Gao C, Li J, Liu X. Recombinant hirudin treatment modulates aquaporin-4 and aquaporin-9 expression after intracerebral hemorrhage in vivo. Mol Biol Rep. 2009 May;36(5):1119-27. doi: 10.1007/s11033-008-9287-3. Epub 2008 Jun 24. — View Citation

Szmydynger-Chodobska J, Chung I, Kozniewska E, Tran B, Harrington FJ, Duncan JA, Chodobski A. Increased expression of vasopressin v1a receptors after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Aug;21(8):1090-102. — View Citation

Taya K, Gulsen S, Okuno K, Prieto R, Marmarou CR, Marmarou A. Modulation of AQP4 expression by the selective V1a receptor antagonist, SR49059, decreases trauma-induced brain edema. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:425-9. — View Citation

Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke. 1996 Sep;27(9):1459-66. Review. — View Citation

Thiex R, Tsirka SE. Brain edema after intracerebral hemorrhage: mechanisms, treatment options, management strategies, and operative indications. Neurosurg Focus. 2007 May 15;22(5):E6. Review. — View Citation

Trabold R, Krieg S, Schöller K, Plesnila N. Role of vasopressin V(1a) and V2 receptors for the development of secondary brain damage after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2008 Dec;25(12):1459-65. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0597. — View Citation

Venkatasubramanian C, Mlynash M, Finley-Caulfield A, Eyngorn I, Kalimuthu R, Snider RW, Wijman CA. Natural history of perihematomal edema after intracerebral hemorrhage measured by serial magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):73-80. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.590646. Epub 2010 Dec 16. — View Citation

Verbalis JG, Zeltser D, Smith N, Barve A, Andoh M. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in patients with euvolaemic hyponatraemia: subgroup analysis of a randomized, controlled study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008 Jul;69(1):159-68. Epub 2008 Jul 1. — View Citation

Volbers B, Willfarth W, Kuramatsu JB, Struffert T, Dörfler A, Huttner HB, Schwab S, Staykov D. Impact of Perihemorrhagic Edema on Short-Term Outcome After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2016 Jun;24(3):404-12. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0185-y. — View Citation

Wilcox CS. Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest. 1983 Mar;71(3):726-35. — View Citation

Wright WL, Asbury WH, Gilmore JL, Samuels OB. Conivaptan for hyponatremia in the neurocritical care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(1):6-13. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9152-1. Epub 2008 Nov 12. — View Citation

Yool AJ, Brown EA, Flynn GA. Roles for novel pharmacological blockers of aquaporins in the treatment of brain oedema and cancer. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2010 Apr;37(4):403-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05244.x. Epub 2009 Jun 29. Review. — View Citation

Zandor section of the Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Editors-in-chief: Starke, Klaus, Hofmann, Franz B. ISSN: 0171-2004.

Zeltser D, Rosansky S, van Rensburg H, Verbalis JG, Smith N; Conivaptan Study Group. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Am J Nephrol. 2007;27(5):447-57. Epub 2007 Jul 26. — View Citation

Zeynalov E, Chen CH, Froehner SC, Adams ME, Ottersen OP, Amiry-Moghaddam M, Bhardwaj A. The perivascular pool of aquaporin-4 mediates the effect of osmotherapy in postischemic cerebral edema. Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep;36(9):2634-40. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181847853. — View Citation

* Note: There are 51 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Patient Tolerance of Conivaptan	The number of participants with abnormal seizure activity and/or abnormal lab values and/or increase in infection rate and/or any drug-related adverse events.	Baseline to 168 hours post-enrollment
Secondary	In-hospital Mortality	All-cause deaths during hospitalization	Enrollment through hospital discharge, up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Change in Cerebral Edema	Changes in cerebral edema (CE) as measured on CT. Goal is a -5 to -10% change in CE over time. Change will be measured both as absolute change in volume, calculated as the final volume minus the baseline volume measure and converted to a percentage of the baseline volume measure.	Baseline to 168 hours post-enrollment
Secondary	Cost	Cost as measured by length of stay in the neuro ICU.	Enrollment through hospital discharge, up to 3 weeks
Secondary	Cost	Cost as measured by: Need for external ventricular drain (EVD)/bolt or surgical procedures (craniectomy, clot evacuation,VPS) for reduction/management of CE.; Need for central venous lines, arterial lines, peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) lines, tracheostomy/percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs).; Number of patients requiring a ventilator.	Baseline to 168 hours post-enrollment
Secondary	Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score	Modified Rankin Scale (0 to 6) at discharge from the hospital. A score of 0 indicates no disability and a score of 6 indicates the patient died. Functional independence is defined as a score of 2 or less.	At discharge from ICU and from hospital, up to 3 weeks