Effects of Two Different Types of Ankle Foot Orthoses on Gait Outcomes in Patients With Subacute Stroke.

Stroke Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effects of Two Different Types of Ankle Foot Orthoses on Gait Outcomes in Patients With Subacute Stroke.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02693834
• Other study ID #: 18863
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 2016
• Est. completion date: April 2018

Study information

• Verified date: November 2019
• Source: Texas Woman's University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study will be to identify whether patients in the subacute stage of stroke, who demonstrate foot drop, will have better gait outcomes when using a Double Adjustable AFO, or a Posterior Leaf Spring AFO. A secondary purpose will be to determine whether one week of practice significantly changes gait outcomes with either of the AFO conditions.

INCLUSION CRITERIA: Twenty participants over the age of 18, of any gender and ethnicity, diagnosed with first time unilateral stroke, 4 - 20 weeks post-stroke onset, resulting in hemiparesis with foot drop will be recruited for this study.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

1. Not able to receive a double adjustable AFO through their insurance

2. Unable to follow two steps commands

3. Unable to ambulate 20 feet with or without assistive device with a minimum level of assistance of contact guard assistance.

4. Cerebellar Stroke

5. Inability to ambulate prior to stroke

6. receiving chemotherapy at the time of study

OUTCOME MEASURES:

1. Six Minute walk test

2. Gait Symmetry and Gait velocity measured with GAITRite for self paced velocity walk and fast paced velocity walk.

DATA COLLECTION:

Data will be collected three times over two weeks period.

First Visit:

Demographics, Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment of sensorimotor function, Mini Mental State Examination 6MWT and GAITRite measurements using Both types of AFO in a random order. Afterwards participant will be given one type of AFO (randomly selected) to practice walking for a week.

Second Visit: 6MWT and GAITRite measurements using the type of AFO they were practicing with. Then the other type of AFO will be given to practice walking for a week.

Third Visit: 6MWT and GAITRite measurements using the second type of AFO that they were practicing with the week prior. Patient will be asked which type of AFO they prefer to use.

Description:

Introduction: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the world today. About 795,000 people are diagnosed with stroke yearly in the United States. The annual cost of stroke from medical services and disability in our nation is $ 38.6 billion dollars. Gait rehabilitation is an important aspect of neurorehabilitation with focus on attaining the most functional and symmetrical gait to prevent falls from faulty gait mechanics, and to prevent sedentary life styles and associated comorbidities. Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed in patients with stroke to address ankle and knee instabilities and to restore a normal and safe walking pattern.The effectiveness of AFOs on various gait parameters has been reported in patients with stroke, but mostly during the chronic stages of recovery. Systematic analyses have shown that use of various types of ankle foot orthoses improve walking impairments and balance, reduce energy costs, and improve knee and ankle kinematics in people in the chronic stage of stroke recovery, greater than 6 months since the onset of stroke. It is reported that the majority of the gait improvements occur within the first 6 months following the onset of stroke. However, a limited number of studies have investigated the effects of AFOs within six months of stroke onset.

Three reported studies have investigated the effects of using an AFO compared to not using an AFO within 6 months following onset of stroke. Rao et al found that the use of an AFO significantly improved gait velocity, cadence and step length on the affected and unaffected side. Hyun et al. found that using an AFO significantly improved VO2 peak and 6 minute walk test scores . Carse et al showed significant improvement in walking velocity, average step length and cadence with use of AFO. There is only one reported study which looked at the effects of using two different types of AFOs during the subacute stage of stroke, less than 6 months following onset. Results of this study showed that gait speed and knee and ankle control were significantly higher in the Chignon AFO group compared to the polypropylene AFO group. Additionally, participants in the Chignon AFO group had significantly lower spasticity than those in the polypropylene AFO group.

In a recent case series report, investigators observed that using a custom Double Adjustable AFO during the early stages of recovery after stroke resulted in more typical muscle activation patterns, gait endurance and velocity, and near normal symmetry during gait without an assistive device or an AFO in three participants. The use of this type of AFO for gait rehabilitation following stroke in the subacute stages has not been thoroughly studied.

Statement of the Problem Patients with stroke resulting in hemiparesis and foot drop are affected by gait impairments such as poor symmetry, decreased velocity, and decreased endurance. AFOs have been shown to be an effective intervention for improving gait parameters in individuals who are in the chronic stage of stroke recovery. Although, the majority of gait improvements occur within six months of stroke, the effect of early bracing with different types of AFOs on gait outcomes has not been investigated thoroughly.

Purpose of the study:

The purpose of this study will be to identify whether patients in the subacute stage of stroke, who demonstrate foot drop, will have better gait outcomes when using a Double Adjustable AFO, or a Posterior Leaf Spring AFO. A secondary purpose will be to determine whether one week of practice significantly changes gait outcomes with either of the AFO conditions.

Research Hypotheses

The research hypotheses of this study are as follows:

1. There will be a difference in gait endurance measurements, gait symmetry measurements and gait velocity measurements at baseline when using custom Double Adjustable AFO compared to a PLS AFO in patients in subacute stage of stroke.

2. There will be a difference in gait endurance measurements, gait symmetry measurements and gait velocity measurements after one week of practice when using custom Double Adjustable AFO compared to a PLS AFO in patients in subacute stage of stroke.

3. After a week of practice, there will be a difference in gait endurance measurements, gait symmetry measurements and gait velocity measurements compared to baseline measurements, when using either custom Double Adjustable AFO or a PLS AFO in patients in subacute stage of stroke.

Participants Twenty participants over the age of 18, of any gender and ethnicity, diagnosed with first time unilateral stroke, 4 - 20 weeks post-stroke onset, resulting in hemiparesis with foot drop will be recruited. The number of participants was estimated based on previously reported studies. Hyun et al found significant differences in gait endurance measured by 6MWT when using AFO compared to using no AFO with 15 participants in a similar study. In another study by Carse et al, gait velocity and gait symmetry were found to be significantly better with 8 participants.Therefore, for our study, the potential participant number was projected as 20.

Participants will be recruited through a sample of convenience from Baylor Institute of Rehabilitation locations and through word of mouth. The physical therapists at these locations will be given a brief description of the proposed study and will be asked to screen for potential participants. Participants who meet the inclusion criteria and possess none of the exclusion criteria will be asked to volunteer for the study. Each participant will read or be read their rights as human subjects and asked to sign the informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Boards of both Baylor Health Care System and Texas Woman's University prior to enrollment in this study. A Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be performed to determine whether the participant has the cognitive ability to sign the informed consent. Participants will be scheduled to do data collection on the day they receive their custom double adjustable AFO at Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation, Frisco location.

Procedures:All measurements will be obtained from each participant during three testing sessions and by only one researcher to avoid inter tester reliability issues. On the first measurement day, the primary investigator will collect demographic data including age, height, weight, leg length measurements on each side, and Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment of sensorimotor function. Then the gait outcomes will be measured using one of the two AFO conditions in random order. The participant will select the order of AFO condition by drawing out of a hat. Randomization without replacement will be used. Once the order of AFO wearing has been determined, data will be collected in the randomly selected order. Participants will be allowed to use any type of assistive device of their choice, but the same device will be used for all conditions.

First, the 6MWT will be administered with the participant wearing the first randomized AFO. Participants will be asked to ambulate as far as possible in 6 minutes at a self-selected walking velocity through a well-lit indoor corridor. A five minute seated resting will be provided. Next, gait symmetry and gait velocity measurements will be obtained using the GAITRite system. Participants will be given a practice trial walk prior to beginning of the testing. Participants will be asked to walk at their comfortable self-selected walking velocity along the walkway. They will begin walking three meters from the start of the walkway and will stop walking two meters past the end of the walkway. The beginning and end of the walking area will be marked with red tape for visibility. The verbal instruction will be "Please walk from this red line to that red line at your comfortable speed safely". A second personnel will be walking close to the participant outside of the walkway to ensure safety. After a five minute sitting break, participant will be asked to walk as fast as they can safely. The verbal instruction will be "Please walk from this red line to that red line as fast as you can safely". The GAITRite system will be able to capture both gait symmetry and gait velocity measurements with the same walk. Three trials will be performed of the self-selected velocity walk and fast paced velocity walk. The calculated mean of the three trials will be used for data analysis. After a 10 minute seated rest break, the second AFO condition will be used and measurements will be repeated in the same order described above.

To assess the effects of practice on the gait measures, AFO's will be randomized for practice. Participants will be randomized for which AFO they will wear first. Then the participant will be provided with the selected type of AFO to practice with for the following week using a prescribed wearing schedule. At the end of the one-week practice time, the primary investigator will obtain the same measurements obtained at baseline with the participant wearing the type of AFO that was used to practice the week before. The same testing conditions and order of testing that were used at baseline will be employed. Once measurements are completed, the participant will be provided with the second type of AFO and will be asked to wear for one week using the same prescribed wearing schedule as before. Final measurements will be taken after completion of the one-week practice using the second type of AFO with the same testing conditions and orders. At the conclusion of testing each participant will be asked which AFO they will prefer to use.

Data Analysis : Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all demographic data including age, height, weight, time since onset Fugl Meyer lower extremity assessment score and AFO preference. Differences in gait endurance will be analyzed using a 2x2 repeated measures ANOVA Differences in gait symmetry, and gait velocity between the two AFO conditions and two practice conditions will be analyzed using two separate 2x2 repeated measures MANOVA. If assumption of sphericity is not met, Greenhouse-Geisser statistic will be used. An alpha level of .05 will be used to determine significance of differences, with a Bonferroni correction applied as needed to protect against Type I error.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 23
• Est. completion date: April 2018
• Est. primary completion date: April 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosed with first time unilateral stroke

• 4 - 20 weeks post-stroke onset

• resulting in hemiparesis with foot drop

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to receive a double adjustable AFO through their insurance

• unable to follow two steps commands

• unable to ambulate 20 feet with or without assistive device with a minimum level of assistance of contact guard assistance

• diagnosis of cerebellar stroke

• non ambulatory prior to stroke onset

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• CVA
• Foot Drop
• Hemiparesis
• Hemiplegia
• Paresis
• Peroneal Neuropathies
• Stroke

Intervention

Device:
• Posterior Leaf spring AFO
Posterior Leaf Spring AFO is an over the shelf polypropylene ankle foot orthosis to assist foot drop.
• Double adjustable AFO
Double adjustable AFO is a custom AFO with double action metal upright joints

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Baylor Institute for rehabilitation	Frisco	Texas

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Texas Woman's University	Baylor Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (26)

Bijleveld-Uitman M, van de Port I, Kwakkel G. Is gait speed or walking distance a better predictor for community walking after stroke? J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jun;45(6):535-40. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1147. — View Citation

Bourland EL, Neville MA, Pickens ND. Loss, gain, and the reframing of perspectives in long-term stroke survivors: a dynamic experience of quality of life. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):437-49. doi: 10.1310/tsr1805-437. — View Citation

Carse B, Bowers R, Meadows BC, Rowe P. The immediate effects of fitting and tuning solid ankle-foot orthoses in early stroke rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2015 Dec;39(6):454-62. doi: 10.1177/0309364614538090. Epub 2014 Jun 17. — View Citation

de Sèze MP, Bonhomme C, Daviet JC, Burguete E, Machat H, Rousseaux M, Mazaux JM. Effect of early compensation of distal motor deficiency by the Chignon ankle-foot orthosis on gait in hemiplegic patients: a randomized pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2011 Nov;25(11):989-98. doi: 10.1177/0269215511410730. Epub 2011 Jul 12. — View Citation

Eng JJ, Pang MY, Ashe MC. Balance, falls, and bone health: role of exercise in reducing fracture risk after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(2):297-313. Review. — View Citation

Everaert DG, Stein RB, Abrams GM, Dromerick AW, Francisco GE, Hafner BJ, Huskey TN, Munin MC, Nolan KJ, Kufta CV. Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Sep;27(7):579-91. doi: 10.1177/1545968313481278. Epub 2013 Apr 4. — View Citation

GAITRite electronic walkway technical reference, revision L. (2013.). (No. WI-02-15).CIR Systems Inc. (GAITRite technical manual)

Harris JE, Eng JJ, Marigold DS, Tokuno CD, Louis CL. Relationship of balance and mobility to fall incidence in people with chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2005 Feb;85(2):150-8. — View Citation

Hesse, S. (2003). Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: Evaluation, principles of therapy, novel treatment approaches, and assistive devices. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 19(2), 109-126.

Hyun CW, Kim BR, Han EY, Kim SM. Use of an ankle-foot orthosis improves aerobic capacity in subacute hemiparetic stroke patients. PM R. 2015 Mar;7(3):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.08.944. Epub 2014 Aug 16. — View Citation

Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Jan;76(1):27-32. — View Citation

Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):281-99. Review. — View Citation

Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 May;23(4):313-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968308328727. Epub 2008 Dec 31. Review. — View Citation

Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Feb;85(2):234-9. — View Citation

McCain, K. J., Smith, P. S., & Querry, R. (2012). Ankle-foot orthosis selection to facilitate gait recovery in adults after stroke: A case series. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 24 (3), 111-121.

Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1998 Aug;12(4):338-47. — View Citation

Rao N, Chaudhuri G, Hasso D, D'Souza K, Wening J, Carlson C, Aruin AS. Gait assessment during the initial fitting of an ankle foot orthosis in individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2008 Jul;3(4):201-7. doi: 10.1080/17483100801973023. — View Citation

Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sorlie PD, Sotoodehnia N, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):188-97. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182456d46. Erratum in: Circulation. 2012 Jun 5;125(22):e1001. — View Citation

Rosa MC, Marques A, Demain S, Metcalf CD. Fast gait speed and self-perceived balance as valid predictors and discriminators of independent community walking at 6 months post-stroke--a preliminary study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(2):129-34. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.911969. Epub 2014 Apr 23. — View Citation

Rosén E, Sunnerhagen KS, Kreuter M. Fear of falling, balance, and gait velocity in patients with stroke. Physiother Theory Pract. 2005 Apr-Jun;21(2):113-20. — View Citation

Schmid AA, Rittman M. Consequences of poststroke falls: activity limitation, increased dependence, and the development of fear of falling. Am J Occup Ther. 2009 May-Jun;63(3):310-6. — View Citation

Simons CD, van Asseldonk EH, van der Kooij H, Geurts AC, Buurke JH. Ankle-foot orthoses in stroke: effects on functional balance, weight-bearing asymmetry and the contribution of each lower limb to balance control. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Nov;24(9):769-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 8. — View Citation

Slijper A, Danielsson A, Willén C. Ambulatory Function and Perception of Confidence in Persons with Stroke with a Custom-Made Hinged versus a Standard Ankle Foot Orthosis. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:206495. doi: 10.1155/2012/206495. Epub 2012 May 17. — View Citation

Tyson SF, Kent RM. Effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on balance and walking after stroke: a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jul;94(7):1377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.025. Epub 2013 Feb 12. Review. — View Citation

Tyson SF, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Nester CJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanics after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Oct;27(10):879-91. doi: 10.1177/0269215513486497. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Review. — View Citation

Watanabe Y. Fear of falling among stroke survivors after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005 Jun;28(2):149-52. — View Citation

* Note: There are 26 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Gait Endurance	6 Minute Walk test (6MWT) to assess gait endurance using DA AFO and PLS AFO	at baseline
Primary	Gait Endurance	6MWT to assess gait endurance	1 week of practice with DA AFO and with PLS AFO randomly
Secondary	Gait Symmetry	Using GAITRite for Self Selected Velocity (SSV) and Fast paced Velocity (FPV) walk Step symmetry was calculated as the ratio of affected step length over unaffected step length. Step symmetry was calculated for Self Selected Velocity (SSV) and Fast paced Velocity (FPV)	at baseline,1 week with DA AFO, 1 week with PLS AFO
Secondary	Gait Velocity SSV and FPV	using GAITRite for Self selected velocity (SSV)walk and fast paced velocity (FPV) walk	at baseline,1 week with DA AFO, 1 week with PLS AFO