Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined Sensory Modulation Intervention in Chronic Stroke Patients

Stroke Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Effect of the Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined Sensory Modulation Intervention on Upper Extremity Functional Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Stroke

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01847157
• Other study ID #: 201202016RIB
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: April 22, 2013
• Last updated: February 16, 2016
• Start date: January 2013
• Est. completion date: June 2015

Study information

• Verified date: February 2016
• Source: National Taiwan University Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Taiwan: Department of Health
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Background and purpose:

About 30% of people with stroke suffered from severe long-term upper extremity （UE） motor impairment. Severe UE impairment, especially dysfunction of hand, can greatly impact stroke patients' daily living independence and quality of life. However, treatment effect of current interventions is still limited. Nick Ward and Leonardo Cohen suggested 5 intervention strategies for stroke motor recovery: （1） reduction of somatosensory input from the intact; （2） increase in somatosensory input from the paretic; （3） anesthesia of a body part proximal to the paretic hand; （4） activity within the affected motor cortex may be up-regulated; （5） activity within the intact motor cortex may be down-regulated. Recent studies have shown each strategy to be effective in stroke patients with mild or moderate UE impairment. However, evidence for people with severe UE impairment after stroke remains unclear. Since research has found a greater effect for combined strategies than a single strategy, this proposal develops a combined intervention with the above 5 strategies, named "transcranial direct current stimulation （tDCS） combined sensory modulation intervention". This intervention is expected to be most effective for people with severe UE impairment after stroke.

In addition, neuroimaging can provide in vivo information about the brain plasticity which underpinning the motor recovery after stroke. However, image indexes that can be used in stroke patients with severe UE impairment remained examined. Therefore, this proposal has 3 aims: （1） to examine the treatment effect of the "tDCS combined sensory modulation intervention" in stroke patients with severe UE impairment; （2） to examine the underline mechanism of the efficacy of "tDCS combined sensory modulation intervention" using neuroimaging technology.

Methods:

This study is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial which will recruit 60 people who have had stroke onset more than 6 months and have severe UE motor impairment. All participants will be randomly assigned into 2 groups. The experimental group will be given the "tDCS combined sensory modulation intervention", combining bilateral tDCS stimulation, anesthesia techniques and repetitive passive motor training. The control group is given sham tDCS, sham anesthesia and repetitive passive motor training. Each group will be evaluated for outcomes at 4 time points （i.e. baseline, post-intervention, 3 months and 6months post-intervention）. The immediate and long-term effect of the interventions will be examined.

Primary outcome indicators include upper extremity impairment measures. Secondary outcome measures include upper extremity function, activities of daily living function, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging （fMRI）, and corticospinal tract structural integrity using diffusion spectrum imaging （DSI）. Fifteen subjects of each group will be assessed 2 times （i.e., prior to the intervention and after the intervention） for fMRI and DSI scan.

Anticipatory results and contributions:

The results of the studies are expected to present a potentially effective intervention for stroke patients with severe impaired UE motor. Imaging evidence of brain plasticity for this particular intervention is also provided. The results will contribute to our understanding of brain plasticity for UE motor recovery after stroke. Findings from this proposal may help researchers and clinicians choose or develop interventions that are optimal to their clients individually.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 25
• Est. completion date: June 2015
• Est. primary completion date: June 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 40 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. first ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients identified by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

2. age between 40 and 80 years old

3. have a stroke over 6 months

4. unilateral hemiplegia

5. Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity (FMA-UE) score?29 when selection

6. poststroke elbow flexor spasticity less than 2 using modified Ashworth scale (MAS)

7. no severe anesthesia (FMA sensory test, upper extremity score?10 )

8. no wrist and finger joint pain

9. clear consciousness, can understand simple sentences and spoken orders, and co-operate manipulation

10. can accept motor training in the sitting position for approximately 30 minutes.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Suffer from other orthopedic diseases (such as severe arthritis), nerve damage (such as peripheral nerve damage), or severe pain, which influences upper extremity motor

2. have a medical history or family history of epilepsy

3. regularly take central nervous system drugs (such as sedatives), or the Class III antiarrhythmic drugs (such as amiodarone)

4. have atopic dermatitis or skin disorders of the scalp

5. have allergy to anesthetic medicines of the acyl amine

6. have a metal implant in the head or neck, or serious arrhythmia (the heartbeat is less than 50 beats per minute or higher than 100 beats per minute); or use a pacemaker or atrial defibrillator

7. suffer from congenital or idiopathic methemoglobinemia. Aphasia is not an exclusion criterion, but the patients should understand simple spoken orders.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Stroke

Intervention

Device:
• tDCS
Intelect mobile combination (Intelect, USA) is utilized as a direct current stimulator. The 25 cm2 electrodes on a sponge slice immersed in physiological salt solution are fixed on the left and right positions C3/ C4 of subject head (according to the international 10-20 system of electroencephalogram). During the treatment, 1.5 mA electric current is applied to stimulate the subjects in the experimental group for totally 30 minutes. At the start and the end of stimulation, the electric current will gradually increase from zero, or reduce to zero in 1 minute in order to avoid the possible appearance of slight flash effect of subject eyesight, which is caused by instantly turning on or turning off the electric current.

Drug:
• Epidermis anesthesia
15 g of Emla 5% Cream(anesthetic) is applied to the ventral surface of the forearm of unaffected side with a distance of 10 mm from the wrist, and an area of 150 mm long x 50 mm wide. Furthermore, 10 g Emla 5% Cream(anesthetic) is applied to the ventral surface of the upper arm of affected side with a distance of 10 mm from the wrist, and an area of 100 mm long x 50 mm wide.
• sham anesthesia
15 g of 5% body Cream is applied to the ventral surface of the forearm of unaffected side with a distance of 10 mm from the wrist, and an area of 150 mm long x 50 mm wide. 10 g body Cream is applied to the ventral surface of the upper arm of affected side with a distance of 10 mm from the wrist, and an area of 100 mm long x 50 mm wide.

Other:
• Repeated passive movement
Repeated passive wrist extension training: Patients' wrist joint are passively moved by a trained occupational therapist (joint moving angle = 0- 60 degree), frequency 1 Hz, maintain for 20 minutes. Finger passive flexion and extension training: Patients' fingers joint are passively moved by a trained occupational therapist, frequency 1 Hz, maintain for 10 minutes.

Device:
• sham tDCS
The equipment of sham stimulation in the control group is exactly the same as the equipment in the experiment group. However, the only difference is that 30 seconds after the start of electric current, the experimenter turns off the powder under subject ignorance situation. The stimulation just gives patients weak sense of electric current, in order to blind them for which group they are in.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Taiwan	National Taiwan University Hospital	Taipei

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
National Taiwan University Hospital	National Science Council, Taiwan

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

References & Publications (7)

Hesse S, Waldner A, Mehrholz J, Tomelleri C, Pohl M, Werner C. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(9):838-46. doi: 10.1177/1545968311413906. Epub 2011 Aug 8. — View Citation

Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology. 2010 Dec 14;75(24):2176-84. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a. Epub 2010 Nov 10. — View Citation

Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1. Review. — View Citation

Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, O'Shea J, Allman C, Bosnell RA, Kischka U, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H. Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke. Brain. 2012 Jan;135(Pt 1):276-84. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr313. Epub 2011 Dec 6. — View Citation

Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614. Review. — View Citation

Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004 Dec;61(12):1844-8. Review. — View Citation

Weiss T, Sens E, Teschner U, Meissner W, Preul C, Witte OW, Miltner WH. Deafferentation of the affected arm: a method to improve rehabilitation? Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1363-70. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601138. Epub 2011 Mar 31. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change from baseline Fugl Meyer Assessment(FMA)upper extremities subscale after intervention	FMA-UE estimates the movement of proximal upper extremity (including shoulder joint, elbow joint and forearm), wrist joint and hand.; Each movement is estimated by 3 scaled rules (0-1-2): score 0 indicates that the patient has no movement at all; score 1 indicates that the patient can perform partial movements; score 2 indicates that the patient can normally perform all movements.; The total score in the differential scale is 66, and a higher score indicates that the patient has better movement ability.	Assessed at the baseline section (within 3 days ahead to the 1st intervention section), and then again immediately following the 8 weeks intervention (within 3 days after the latest intervention section)	No
Primary	Change from baseline Active joint activity after intervention	A protractor is used to estimate 4 active joint activities of patients,including wrist extension, carpometacarpal extension, metacarpophalangeal extension, and shoulder flexion.	Assessed at the baseline section (within 3 days ahead to the 1st intervention section), and then again immediately following the 8 weeks intervention (within 3 days after the latest intervention section)	No
Primary	Change from baseline Muscle tone after intervention	Motor assessment scale (MAS) is used to estimate muscle tension in patients, and the estimated muscles include the flexors and extensors of elbow, wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints.; MAS is totally divided into 6 scales (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, 4), and a higher score indicates that the patient has higher muscle tension.	Assessed at the baseline section (within 3 days ahead to the 1st intervention section), and then again immediately following the 8 weeks intervention (within 3 days after the latest intervention section)	No
Secondary	Change from baseline research arm test (ARAT) after intervention	ARAT measures 4 upper extremity functions, including grasp, grip, pinch, and gross motor. It includes 19 items using 4-point scale (0-1-2-3). Total score is 57.A higher score indicates that the patient has higher upper extremity function.	Assessed at the baseline section (within 3 days ahead to the 1st intervention section), and then again immediately following the 8 weeks intervention (within 3 days after the latest intervention section)	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Barthel Index(BI) after intervention	Barthel Index with total possible scores ranging from 0 to 20 is utilized to estimate patients' basic functions in daily life. It has 10 items. Higher scores indicate higher independence in daily life.	Assessed at the baseline section (within 3 days ahead to the 1st intervention section), and then again immediately following the 8 weeks intervention (within 3 days after the latest intervention section)	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) after intervention	PHQ-9 is used to evaluate patients' depressive symptoms. PHQ-9 includes 9 items, using 4-point scale (0-1-2-3) to estimate the appearance frequency of each depressive symptom. Total possible scores range from 0 to 27, and a higher score indicates a higher appearance frequency of melancholic symptoms.	Assessed at the baseline section (within 3 days ahead to the 1st intervention section), and then again immediately following the 8 weeks intervention (within 3 days after the latest intervention section)	No
Secondary	Change from baseline fMRI activation after intervention	3T Siemens whole body nuclear magnetic resonance imaging system (Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with 32-channel phase-array head coil is utilized to collect image information.; Patients put left and right hands in left and right pneumatic 10-finger stimulators (Mag Design and Engineering, USA), respectively. This instrument does not have any invasive risk.	Assessed at the baseline section (within 3 days ahead to the 1st intervention section), and then again immediately following the 8 weeks intervention (within 3 days after the latest intervention section)	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Diffusion Spectrum Imaging after intervention	3T Siemens whole body nuclear magnetic resonance imaging system (Trio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with 32-channel phase-array head coil is utilized to collect image information.; Patients are asked to lie down and keep relax on the scanning table for 20 minutes. This instrument does not have any invasive risk.; Patients' corticospinal tract structural integrity will be analyzed after imaging preprocessing.	Assessed at the baseline section (within 7 days ahead to the 1st intervention section), and then again immediately following the 8 weeks intervention (within 7 days after the latest intervention section).	No
Secondary	Change from baseline research arm test (ARAT) at 3 months after intervention	ARAT measures 4 upper extremity functions, including grasp, grip, pinch, and gross motor. It includes 19 items using 4-point scale (0-1-2-3). Total score is 57.A higher score indicates that the patient has higher upper extremity function.	Assessed at 3 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline research arm test (ARAT) at 6 months after intervention	ARAT measures 4 upper extremity functions, including grasp, grip, pinch, and gross motor. It includes 19 items using 4-point scale (0-1-2-3). Total score is 57.A higher score indicates that the patient has higher upper extremity function.	Assessed at 6 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Barthel Index(BI) at 3 months after intervention	Barthel Index with total possible scores ranging from 0 to 20 is utilized to estimate patients' basic functions in daily life. It has 10 items. Higher scores indicate higher independence in daily life.	Assessed at 3 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at 3 months after intervention	PHQ-9 is used to evaluate patients' depressive symptoms. PHQ-9 includes 9 items, using 4-point scale (0-1-2-3) to estimate the appearance frequency of each depressive symptom. Total possible scores range from 0 to 27, and a higher score indicates a higher appearance frequency of melancholic symptoms.	Assessed at 3 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Barthel Index(BI) at 6 months after intervention	Barthel Index with total possible scores ranging from 0 to 20 is utilized to estimate patients' basic functions in daily life. It has 10 items. Higher scores indicate higher independence in daily life.	Assessed at 6 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at 6 months after intervention	PHQ-9 is used to evaluate patients' depressive symptoms. PHQ-9 includes 9 items, using 4-point scale (0-1-2-3) to estimate the appearance frequency of each depressive symptom. Total possible scores range from 0 to 27, and a higher score indicates a higher appearance frequency of melancholic symptoms.	Assessed at 6 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Fugl Meyer Assessment(FMA)upper extremities subscale at 3 months after intervention	FMA-UE estimates the movement of proximal upper extremity (including shoulder joint, elbow joint and forearm), wrist joint and hand.; Each movement is estimated by 3 scaled rules (0-1-2): score 0 indicates that the patient has no movement at all; score 1 indicates that the patient can perform partial movements; score 2 indicates that the patient can normally perform all movements.; The total score in the differential scale is 66, and a higher score indicates that the patient has better movement ability.	Assessed at 3 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Active joint activity at 3 months after intervention	A protractor is used to estimate 4 active joint activities of patients,including wrist extension, carpometacarpal extension, metacarpophalangeal extension, and shoulder flexion.	Assessed at 3 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Muscle tone at 3 months after intervention	Motor assessment scale (MAS) is used to estimate muscle tension in patients, and the estimated muscles include the flexors and extensors of elbow, wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints.; MAS is totally divided into 6 scales (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, 4), and a higher score indicates that the patient has higher muscle tension.	Assessed at 3 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Fugl Meyer Assessment(FMA)upper extremities subscale at 6 months after intervention	FMA-UE estimates the movement of proximal upper extremity (including shoulder joint, elbow joint and forearm), wrist joint and hand.; Each movement is estimated by 3 scaled rules (0-1-2): score 0 indicates that the patient has no movement at all; score 1 indicates that the patient can perform partial movements; score 2 indicates that the patient can normally perform all movements.; The total score in the differential scale is 66, and a higher score indicates that the patient has better movement ability.	Assessed at 6 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Active joint activity at 6 months after intervention	A protractor is used to estimate 4 active joint activities of patients,including wrist extension, carpometacarpal extension, metacarpophalangeal extension, and shoulder flexion.	Assessed at 6 months after intervention	No
Secondary	Change from baseline Muscle tone at 6 months after intervention	Motor assessment scale (MAS) is used to estimate muscle tension in patients, and the estimated muscles include the flexors and extensors of elbow, wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints.; MAS is totally divided into 6 scales (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, 4), and a higher score indicates that the patient has higher muscle tension.	Assessed at 6 months after intervention	No