Comparative Efficacy of Three Preparations of Botox-A in Treating Spasticity

Stroke Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparative Efficacy of Three Preparations of Botox-A in Treating Spasticity

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00178646
• Other study ID #: HSC-MS-01-103
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: January 2002
• Est. completion date: March 2010

Study information

• Verified date: January 2021
• Source: The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study seeks to compare the effectiveness of three preparations of BOTOX-A® in treating muscle tightness and spasms in the feet and ankles of people with stroke.

Description:

Spasticity is one of the most debilitating complications of neurologic conditions, such as stroke, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. Although the exact pathophysiology is unknown, it is believed to result from an imbalance of ascending excitatory influences on and descending inhibitory components of the central nervous system. Clinically, spasticity manifests as abnormally increased muscle tone, associated with loss of range of motion, increased muscle stretch reflexes, clonus, weakness, and incoordination. If inadequately treated, spasticity leads to more disability and increase health care costs. Common complications of inadequately treated spasticity include joint and muscle contracture, pain, difficulty with performing activities of daily living and hygiene, and impaired transfers and ambulation. Acquired brain injuries (ABI), including stroke, traumatic brain injury, and encephalopathy, often lead to long-term impairments, including spasticity. In severe cases, spasticity is difficult and frustrating to treat in this patient population, since the individuals may not tolerate the side effects of conventional therapies because of ABI-related deficits in arousal and cognition. Systemic medications, such as baclofen and tizanidine, are effective in controlling spasticity; however, they may also cause sleepiness and drowsiness, and impair memory and thinking processes---adverse effects that individuals with ABI may not tolerate. Thus, "local" treatments, such as neurolysis and chemodenervation using botulinum toxin, have become superior treatment options in individuals with ABI, since they are devoid of the usual side effects of systemic medications. They are also effective in controlling spasticity, yet they do not impair arousal and cognition. The medical literature is replete with reports of the efficacy of botulinum toxin-A in the management of spasticity. Thus, the current challenge for clinicians and researchers at this time is to find ways to further enhance the efficacy of botulinum toxin. One way to achieve this is by exploiting certain properties of the toxin. Animal studies and clinical experience have shown that the effects of the drug is dose-dependent. One other property is the flexibility in preparing the volume of drug injected. Since botulinum toxin, as it is currently available (as BOTOX-A®) in the United States, requires reconstitution with preservative-free saline, there is flexibility for clinicians to manipulate the volume of solution that will be administered, without altering the dose. We recently completed a trial comparing the effects of two volume preparations of BOTOX-A® on wrist and finger flexor spasticity of individuals with ABI. One group of patients received BOTOX-A® prepared as 100 units/cc, while another received BOTOX-A® prepared as 50 units/cc. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, there was a trend in favor of the group that received the higher volume, i.e.; they appeared to improve more based on decrease in muscle tone (measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale). This was compared by the clinician's global impression that the high volume group improved more. The latter measure achieved statistical significance. One possible reason for the absence of statistical significance was that the "high" volume (50 units/cc) was not high enough. Thus, we are proposing this study to investigate the comparative effects of three preparations of BOTOX-A®.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 33
• Est. completion date: March 2010
• Est. primary completion date: March 2010
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 12 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria -

• Spasticity resulting from ABI (stroke, including vascular malformations, traumatic brain injury)
• Ashworth Score (resting) of at least 2 of the primary ankle plantarflexor (gastrocnemius)
• Onset of primary illness at least six months prior to study inclusion
• At least 12 years of age Exclusion Criteria -
• Hypersensitivity or allergy to botulinum toxin
• History of myasthenia gravis or other neuromuscular disease
• Current use of aminoglycosides
• Botulinum toxin or phenol injection to study limb within six months prior to recruitment
• Current use of other spasmolytic drug, such as diazepam, baclofen, dantrolene, tizanidine
• Presence of contracture or significant muscle atrophy
• Pregnancy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Brain Injuries
• Muscle Spasticity
• Spasticity
• Stroke

Intervention

Drug:
• Botox
Botox 75-150 units, single treatment only

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Memorial Hermann Hospital	Houston	Texas
United States	Kessler Institute for Rehabiliation	West Orange	New Jersey

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston	Allergan

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Francisco GE, Boake C, Vaughn A. Botulinum toxin in upper limb spasticity after acquired brain injury: a randomized trial comparing dilution techniques. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 May;81(5):355-63. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Spastic Hypertonia as Measured by the Ashworth Scale	The Ashworth Scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Score on the Ashworth scores ranges from 0-4, with 4 being the worst: 0 - No increase in muscle tone; - Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; - More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion, but affected limb easily flexed; - Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult; - Limb in flexion or extension	Baseline
Primary	Spastic Hypertonia as Measured by the Ashworth Scale	The Ashworth Scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Score on the Ashworth scores ranges from 0-4, with 4 being the worst: 0: No increase in muscle tone; Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion, but affected limb easily flexed; Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult; Limb in flexion or extension	Four weeks
Primary	Spastic Hypertonia as Measured by the Ashworth Scale	The Ashworth Scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Score on the Ashworth scores ranges from 0-4, with 4 being the worst: 0: No increase in muscle tone; Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion, but affected limb easily flexed; Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult; Limb in flexion or extension	Eight Weeks
Primary	Spastic Hypertonia as Measured by the Ashworth Scale	The Ashworth Scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Score on the Ashworth scores ranges from 0-4, with 4 being the worst: 0: No increase in muscle tone; Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion, but affected limb easily flexed; Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult; Limb in flexion or extension	Twelve Weeks
Primary	Spastic Hypertonia as Measured by the Ashworth Scale	The Ashworth Scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. Score on the Ashworth scores ranges from 0-4, with 4 being the worst: 0: No increase in muscle tone; Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension; More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion, but affected limb easily flexed; Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult; Limb in flexion or extension	Sixteen Weeks
Secondary	Range of Motion as Measured by Goniometry	This outcome reports the angle formed during ankle dorsiflexion by an imaginary line drawn on the outer side of the leg with an imaginary line drawn on the outside of the foot. The angle changes as the ankle is curled up (dorsiflexed) or down (plantarflexed). Many people with stroke develop muscle tightness (a condition called spasticity) or contracture, which leads to ankle plantarflexion and results in a "foot drop" appearance and limits range of motion.; When the ankle is neutral and the foot is flat, the angle between the leg and the foot is roughly a right angle, and this neutral position is indicated as 0 degrees from the neutral position. If the foot is below the neutral position during maximum ankle dorsiflexion, then the angle reported is the number of degrees below the neutral position (reported as a negative value). If the foot is above the neutral position, then the angle reported is the number of degrees above the neutral position (positive value).	Baseline
Secondary	Range of Motion as Measured by Goniometry	This outcome reports the angle formed during ankle dorsiflexion by an imaginary line drawn on the outer side of the leg with an imaginary line drawn on the outside of the foot. The angle changes as the ankle is curled up (dorsiflexed) or down (plantarflexed). Many people with stroke develop muscle tightness (a condition called spasticity) or contracture, which leads to ankle plantarflexion and results in a "foot drop" appearance and limits range of motion.; When the ankle is neutral and the foot is flat, the angle between the leg and the foot is roughly a right angle, and this neutral position is indicated as 0 degrees from the neutral position. If the foot is below the neutral position during maximum ankle dorsiflexion, then the angle reported is the number of degrees below the neutral position (reported as a negative value). If the foot is above the neutral position, then the angle reported is the number of degrees above the neutral position (positive value).	8 weeks