Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: The exit strategy after ureteroscopy for stone treatment remains a topic for discussion. Current EAU guidelines on urolithiasis state that postoperative stenting is indicated in patients at increased risk of postoperative complications. Stenting is not considered necessary in all other cases, and after uncomplicated procedures. Objective: To analyse the postoperative ureteral stenting strategy in clinical practice looking at the indication, type of stents used and the duration of stenting after ureteroscopy for stone treatment. Furthermore, the investigators will examine in what setting the stents are being removed postoperatively. Study design: This study is a prospective, observational, international, multicentre registry study executed by uCARE. Study population: All patients >18 years with a ureter or renal stone who are planned for ureteroscopic treatment by semi-rigid and/or flexible ureteroscopy are eligible for this study.


Clinical Trial Description

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE The majority of patients with stones receive an indication for its active removal by ureteroscopy. In the last two decades, endourological treatment techniques have evolved with several technological advances through miniaturisation of ureteroscopes, digital improvements, and optical imaging enhancement techniques leading to a better image quality, and the development of different disposables such as single-use digital ureteroscopes. This advancement has led to an increased number of indications for ureteroscopic treatment. Aside from this, there are no specific contraindications for ureteroscopic treatment, apart from general problems such as being unfit for anaesthesia or the presence of urinary tract infections, according to the EAU guidelines. The indications for active stone removal of ureteral stones include persistent pain or obstruction, renal insufficiency, and in cases when spontaneous passage is less likely. The indications for active removal of renal stones include stone growth, stone formation in patients who are at high risk for stone formation, symptomatic patients, infection, obstruction, stones larger than 15 mm and the comorbidity profile, social situation and preference of the patient. The procedure can be performed using semi-rigid instruments, mainly for ureter stones, and/or by flexible ureteroscopes, for complete inspection and treatment of the upper tract. The exit strategy after stone treatment varies depending on patient characteristics and comorbidity, residual stone load, per-operative details and complications, and surgeons' preference. Stent placement is recommended by the EAU guidelines in case of increased postoperative complications; in cases of residual fragments, bleeding, perforation, pregnancy or urinary tract infections; as well as in all doubtful cases to avoid stressful emergencies. Postoperative stenting increases postoperative morbidity and urologists should carefully balance the pros and cons of postoperative stenting in each individual case. The ideal stent duration is not known. Ureteral stents are usually removed 1-day postoperatively and most urologists will remove double Js 1-2 weeks postoperatively. It remains a matter of debate whether to stent a patient postoperatively after a ureteroscopic procedure despite the EAU guidelines statement that routine stenting after an uncomplicated procedure with complete stone removal is not necessary. STUDY OBJECTIVES The aim of this registry is to review current clinical practice on postoperative ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for stone treatment. The investigators will explore the answers to the following questions: What are the indications, predictors and outcomes for stent placement? What types of stents are used and what is the duration for stent placement? Hence, the investigators will assess in what setting the stents are being removed, looking at instrumentation, anaesthetics, and location. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03567421
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]
Source Société Internationale d'Urologie
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date June 7, 2018
Completion date August 31, 2019

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05340075 - Staged Bilateral Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Completed NCT05340088 - Optimal Passive Dilation Time in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Completed NCT05032287 - Medical Expulsive Therapy Post-SWL For Renal Stones N/A
Completed NCT06381206 - Silodosin in Management of Lower Ureteral Stones Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT05183269 - Virtual Reality for Pain Control During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: a Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Study at a Single Institution N/A
Completed NCT05646069 - Evaluation of Novel Disposable Flexible Ureteroscope for the Treatment of Renal Calculi N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06436235 - Kidney Stone Inflammation
Completed NCT05413603 - Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06394908 - Registry of MIUS for Urolithiasis (ReMIUS-U)
Recruiting NCT05535816 - Accuracy of Ultrasound for Detecting Residual Fragments During RIRS N/A
Recruiting NCT05460559 - Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Versus Multi-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Renal Stones: N/A
Recruiting NCT05866081 - Stent Omission After Ureteroscopy and Lithotripsy in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative N/A
Completed NCT04594161 - Effectiveness of Drainage by PCN vs. JJ in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by Urolithiasis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03771365 - Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
Recruiting NCT04764071 - Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phase 3
Completed NCT06031103 - Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05759767 - The Efficacy and Safety of Medical Expulsive Therapy After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Pediatric Urolithiasis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04650737 - Single-Shot With Dexmedetomidine Versus Continuous Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05389982 - Mobile Health Platform for Surveillance of Kidney Stone N/A
Completed NCT03388060 - (SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone N/A