Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03567421
Other study ID # uCARE 2018-001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 7, 2018
Est. completion date August 31, 2019

Study information

Verified date April 2021
Source Société Internationale d'Urologie
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: The exit strategy after ureteroscopy for stone treatment remains a topic for discussion. Current EAU guidelines on urolithiasis state that postoperative stenting is indicated in patients at increased risk of postoperative complications. Stenting is not considered necessary in all other cases, and after uncomplicated procedures. Objective: To analyse the postoperative ureteral stenting strategy in clinical practice looking at the indication, type of stents used and the duration of stenting after ureteroscopy for stone treatment. Furthermore, the investigators will examine in what setting the stents are being removed postoperatively. Study design: This study is a prospective, observational, international, multicentre registry study executed by uCARE. Study population: All patients >18 years with a ureter or renal stone who are planned for ureteroscopic treatment by semi-rigid and/or flexible ureteroscopy are eligible for this study.


Description:

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE The majority of patients with stones receive an indication for its active removal by ureteroscopy. In the last two decades, endourological treatment techniques have evolved with several technological advances through miniaturisation of ureteroscopes, digital improvements, and optical imaging enhancement techniques leading to a better image quality, and the development of different disposables such as single-use digital ureteroscopes. This advancement has led to an increased number of indications for ureteroscopic treatment. Aside from this, there are no specific contraindications for ureteroscopic treatment, apart from general problems such as being unfit for anaesthesia or the presence of urinary tract infections, according to the EAU guidelines. The indications for active stone removal of ureteral stones include persistent pain or obstruction, renal insufficiency, and in cases when spontaneous passage is less likely. The indications for active removal of renal stones include stone growth, stone formation in patients who are at high risk for stone formation, symptomatic patients, infection, obstruction, stones larger than 15 mm and the comorbidity profile, social situation and preference of the patient. The procedure can be performed using semi-rigid instruments, mainly for ureter stones, and/or by flexible ureteroscopes, for complete inspection and treatment of the upper tract. The exit strategy after stone treatment varies depending on patient characteristics and comorbidity, residual stone load, per-operative details and complications, and surgeons' preference. Stent placement is recommended by the EAU guidelines in case of increased postoperative complications; in cases of residual fragments, bleeding, perforation, pregnancy or urinary tract infections; as well as in all doubtful cases to avoid stressful emergencies. Postoperative stenting increases postoperative morbidity and urologists should carefully balance the pros and cons of postoperative stenting in each individual case. The ideal stent duration is not known. Ureteral stents are usually removed 1-day postoperatively and most urologists will remove double Js 1-2 weeks postoperatively. It remains a matter of debate whether to stent a patient postoperatively after a ureteroscopic procedure despite the EAU guidelines statement that routine stenting after an uncomplicated procedure with complete stone removal is not necessary. STUDY OBJECTIVES The aim of this registry is to review current clinical practice on postoperative ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for stone treatment. The investigators will explore the answers to the following questions: What are the indications, predictors and outcomes for stent placement? What types of stents are used and what is the duration for stent placement? Hence, the investigators will assess in what setting the stents are being removed, looking at instrumentation, anaesthetics, and location.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 2348
Est. completion date August 31, 2019
Est. primary completion date August 31, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patient >18 years old - Patient is a candidate for ureteroscopic treatment of a ureter or renal stone by semi-rigid and/or flexible ureteroscopy Exclusion Criteria: - Patient <18 years old

Study Design


Locations

Country Name City State
China Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, The Third Clinical Medical College of Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong
China The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology Guangzhou
China Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Ningbo
China Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai
China Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University Shanghai
China Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan
Greece Aretaieion Hospital Athens
Greece Sismanoglio General Hospital Athens
Greece University of Crete, Department of Urology Heraklion
Greece Department of Urology, University Hospital of Larissa Larissa
Greece 1st Department of Urology, Aristotle University Thessaloníki
India Jawahar Lal Nehru (JLN) Medical College Ajmer Rajasthan
India Kulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center Pune
Indonesia Department of Urology, Hasan Sadikin Hospital/Padjadjaran University Bandung
Indonesia Department of Urology, Sanglah Hospital/Udayana University Denpasar
Indonesia Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/University of Indonesia Jakarta
Indonesia Department of Urology, Saiful Anwar Hospital/Brawijaya University Malang
Indonesia Department of Urology, Dr. Soetomo Hospital/Airlangga University Surabaya
Indonesia Department of Urology, Sardjito Hospital/Gadjah Mada University Yogyakarta
Iran, Islamic Republic of Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Hamadan
Iraq University of Basra, College of Medicine, Urology Department Basra
Kenya Pandya Memorial Hospital Mombasa
Korea, Republic of SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center Seoul
Malaysia Selayang Hospital Batu Caves
Malaysia Serdang Hospital Kajang
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia Sarawak General Hospital Kuching
Romania Department of Urology, St. John Clinical Hospital of Emergency Bucharest
Saudi Arabia International Medical Center Jeddah
Saudi Arabia King Abdulaziz University Jeddah
Saudi Arabia Prince Sultan Military Medical City Riyadh
South Africa Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University Ga-Rankuwa
Taiwan Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung Kaohsiung
Taiwan Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital New Taipei City
Taiwan Department of Urology, En Chu Kong Hospital New Taipei City
Taiwan Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei
Turkey Department of Urology, Cukurova University, Adana Adana
Turkey Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology Ankara
Turkey Department of Urology, Gazi University Ankara
Turkey Department of Urology, Hacettepe University Ankara
Turkey Cerrahpasa School of Medicine Istanbul University Istanbul
Turkey Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Bagcilar Hospital Istanbul
Turkey Istanbul Medipol University, Department of Urology Istanbul
Turkey Department of Urology, 9 Eylul University Izmir
Turkey Konya Meram Education & Research Hospital Konya
Turkey Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Medical School Konya
Turkey Selcuk University Selcuklu Medical School Konya
Turkey Department of Urology, Bulent Ecevit University Zonguldak
United States University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Société Internationale d'Urologie

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  China,  Greece,  India,  Indonesia,  Iran, Islamic Republic of,  Iraq,  Kenya,  Korea, Republic of,  Malaysia,  Romania,  Saudi Arabia,  South Africa,  Taiwan,  Turkey, 

References & Publications (3)

ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2). Available at: http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/efficacy/article/efficacy-guidelines.html. Accessed March 25, 2018.

Legemate JD, Wijnstok NJ, Matsuda T, Strijbos W, Erdogru T, Roth B, Kinoshita H, Palacios-Ramos J, Scarpa RM, de la Rosette JJ. Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones. World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1497-1506. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2028-2. Epub 2017 Mar 20. — View Citation

Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis 2016. Available at: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Urolithiasis-2016-1.pdf

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Incidence of patients receiving an internal drain following treatment for urinary stones by ureteroscopy This number will be reported as a % of the total patients enrolled. 6 months
Secondary Number of patients requiring secondary interventions [N] Post-operative secondary interventions include JJ placement, ureter splint placement, nephrostomy tube placement, reURS, clot removal, pharmacological intervention, or other. 6 months
Secondary Number of patients requiring pain medication at discharge [N] Pain defined as that requiring additional therapy or pain medication, or prolonged hospital stay due to pain. 6 months
Secondary Duration of the actual internal drain indwelling time [days] This number is auto-calculated based from the date of surgery, and date of stent removal or post-operative visit (if no stent was used) 6 months
Secondary Duration of the internal drain indwelling time as indicated by the surgeon [days] Calculated as number of days. 6 months
Secondary % of patients who required anaesthesia for stent removal [Yes/No] This intraoperative information will be provided by surgeon to indicate whether anesthesia was required during stent removal. Data to be reported as % of total patients. 6 months
Secondary Incidence of use of flexible instruments for stent removal following ureteroscopy. As indicated by treating surgeon [Yes/No response]. 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05340075 - Staged Bilateral Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Completed NCT05340088 - Optimal Passive Dilation Time in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Completed NCT05032287 - Medical Expulsive Therapy Post-SWL For Renal Stones N/A
Completed NCT06381206 - Silodosin in Management of Lower Ureteral Stones Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT05183269 - Virtual Reality for Pain Control During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: a Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Study at a Single Institution N/A
Completed NCT05646069 - Evaluation of Novel Disposable Flexible Ureteroscope for the Treatment of Renal Calculi N/A
Completed NCT05413603 - Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using Fluoroscopic Versus Ultrasonic Localization N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06394908 - Registry of MIUS for Urolithiasis (ReMIUS-U)
Recruiting NCT05535816 - Accuracy of Ultrasound for Detecting Residual Fragments During RIRS N/A
Recruiting NCT05460559 - Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Versus Multi-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Renal Stones: N/A
Recruiting NCT05866081 - Stent Omission After Ureteroscopy and Lithotripsy in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative N/A
Completed NCT04594161 - Effectiveness of Drainage by PCN vs. JJ in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by Urolithiasis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03771365 - Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
Recruiting NCT04764071 - Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phase 3
Completed NCT06031103 - Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm) N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05759767 - The Efficacy and Safety of Medical Expulsive Therapy After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Pediatric Urolithiasis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04650737 - Single-Shot With Dexmedetomidine Versus Continuous Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05389982 - Mobile Health Platform for Surveillance of Kidney Stone N/A
Completed NCT03388060 - (SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone N/A