Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05518175
Other study ID # HSC-MS-22-0470
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 15, 2022
Est. completion date December 31, 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2023
Source The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Contact Randa J Jalloul, MD
Phone 713-566-5749
Email Randa.J.Jalloul@uth.tmc.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare and capture key elements of the patient experience, quality of recovery, preferences and satisfaction after laparoscopic salpingectomy done via 3 different routes.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 150
Est. completion date December 31, 2024
Est. primary completion date September 30, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 55 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Premenopausal women scheduled to undergo an elective sterilization surgery regardless of parity - non-prolapsed uterus - Patients should able to provide written consent Exclusion Criteria: - Women who have relative contra-indication to vaginal peritoneal access such as: history of rectal surgery, suspected recto-vaginal endometriosis based on clinical history and examination, suspected malignancy, pelvic inflammatory disease, active lower genital tract infection, virginity or pregnancy - Postpartum (immediate) tubal sterilization - Tubal sterilization during a cesarean section

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Traditional laparoscopy
Utilizes three or four 5 mm ports for access and retrieval.
Single site laparoscopy
One port is placed via a 2 to 3 cm umbilical/fascia incision to accommodate the Gelpoint device, where several laparoscopic instruments are used. With this technique, there is a single incision, hidden in the umbilicus a
V-Notes surgery
One port placed trans-vaginally via a 2-3 cm vaginal incision with no abdominal scars

Locations

Country Name City State
United States The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Quality of recovery after surgery as assessed by the Quality of Recovery (QOR-40 )questionnaire This questionnaire has 40 questions, score varies from 40 (poor)-200 (excellent) a higher number indicating a better outcome 24 hours after surgery
Secondary Cosmesis as assessed by the Body Image Questionnaire This includes 5 questions and each is scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1(no, not at all) to 4(yes, extremely) with a maximum score of 20 and higher score indicating a better body image 2 weeks post surgery
Secondary Cosmesis as assessed by the Body Image Questionnaire This includes 5 questions and each is scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1(no, not at all) to 4(yes, extremely) with a maximum score of 20 and higher score indicating a better body image 6 weeks post surgery
Secondary Cosmesis as assessed by the Body Image Questionnaire This includes 5 questions and each is scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1(no, not at all) to 4(yes, extremely) with a maximum score of 20 and higher score indicating a better body image 3 months post surgery
Secondary Change in sexual function as assessed by the Short version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) This has 9 items that address sexual dysfunctions. Each of these items are scored on a six-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, higher the score the better sexual function. Baseline, 3 months post surgery
Secondary Pain as assessed by the Resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rating pain on a scale from 0 to 10, 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain during a quiet breathing period (resting VAS) 24 hours post surgery
Secondary Pain as assessed by the Resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rating pain on a scale from 0 to 10, 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain during a quiet breathing period (resting VAS) 2 weeks post surgery
Secondary Pain as assessed by the Resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rating pain on a scale from 0 to 10, 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain during a quiet breathing period (resting VAS) 6 weeks post surgery
Secondary Pain as assessed by the Resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rating pain on a scale from 0 to 10, 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain during a quiet breathing period (resting VAS) 3 months post surgery
Secondary Pain as assessed by the Dynamic Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rating pain on a scale from 0 to 10, 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain after a voluntary cough (dynamic VAS) 3 months post surgery
Secondary Patient satisfaction as assessed by the satisfaction scale Patients will rate their satisfaction on a 5 point Likert scale from 1(very unsatisfied) to 5(very satisfied) 3 months post surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03438682 - Real World Effectiveness and Safety of Hysteroscopic (Essure®) Compared to Laparoscopic Sterilization
Completed NCT02522806 - Endometrial Local Injury Before First IVF : Evaluation of Pregnancy Rate N/A
Recruiting NCT04314869 - Uterus Transplantation Procedure From a Live Donor N/A
Recruiting NCT05279560 - Ovarian PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) Injection for Follicular Activation N/A
Completed NCT04188444 - Prothrombotic Biomarkers and Ovarian Stimulation
Completed NCT03788421 - Comparison Between 2 Techniques for Bilateral Salpingectomy N/A
Completed NCT04809428 - vNOTES in Elective Bilateral Salpingectomy for Sterilization
Recruiting NCT06434233 - Opioid Use After Laparoscopic Salpingectomy N/A