Clinical Trials Logo

Staging clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Staging.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05884463 Completed - Diagnosis Clinical Trials

18F-FAPI PET Imaging in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Start date: April 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To explore the potential efficacy of 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT for PDAC tumour staging and compare the results with those obtained using 18F-FDG PET/CT.

NCT ID: NCT05407480 Recruiting - Staging Clinical Trials

Thereapeutic Recommendantion for Children With a Hodgkin Lymphoma

GFAOPLH2019
Start date: November 15, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The GFAOP propose a simple and reproducible staging according to clinical, biological and radiological data. Develop standardized but different therapeutic recommendations based on the availability or lack of radiation therapy in the pilot unites who will adapt these recommendations.

NCT ID: NCT04577495 Completed - Thymoma Clinical Trials

Prognostic Factors in Patients Submitted to Surgical Treatment for Thymoma

Start date: January 2005
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Thymoma is the most common primary tumor of the anterior mediastinum. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment of these tumors. The staging and histological classification of thymoma is still a matter of discussion. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan parameters that correlate with histology, stage and prognosis also still have to be completely assessed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential association between clinical, radiologic and pathologic characteristics in patients submitted to surgical treatment for thymoma, assessing their prognostic value. Data of patients submitted to surgical resection for pathologically proven thymoma at our Department of Thoracic Surgery between January 2005 and December 2015 will be retrospectively reviewed. The correlation of preoperative CT scan features, histological and pathological characteristics of thymomas will be evaluated, assessing the prognostic role of these factors.

NCT ID: NCT03208621 Active, not recruiting - Gastric Cancer Clinical Trials

Evaluation of PET and Laparoscopy in STagIng Advanced Gastric Cancer

PLASTIC
Start date: August 1, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Objective: To evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET/CT (PET) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) in addition to initial staging by CT and gastroscopy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Hypothesis: The study hypothesizes that performing DLS and PET for advanced gastric adenocarcinomas results in a reduction in the number of futile gastrectomies performed and a favorable cost-effectiveness. According to the literature, in 27% of patients a futile gastrectomy can be prevented, and the annual cost-reduction is an estimated €916.438. Study design: The study design is a prospective observational study. Study population: The study population consists of patients with a surgically resectable, advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (cT3-4a,N0-3,M0), that are scheduled for treatment with curative intent after initial staging with gastroscopy and CT. Usual care / comparison: Both PET and DLS were recently included in the new Dutch guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer, as staging modalities for advanced (T3-4) tumors after initial staging. The costs of the study population will be compared to retrospective data of patients who underwent curative surgery (gastrectomy) after initial staging with CT alone. Outcome measures: The primary outcome of this study will be the proportion of patients in whom the PET or DLS lead to a change in treatment strategy. The accuracy of each modality will be analyzed separately. Secondary outcome parameters will be diagnostic performance, morbidity and mortality, quality of life, cost-reduction and cost-effectiveness. Sample size: Based on the expectation that 22% of patients will have a change in treatment strategy, at least 239 patients will be needed for this study to demonstrate that the diagnostic modalities in the new guideline are break-even. Approximately 543 patients will be eligible for the study in 36 months. Cost-effectiveness analysis: A state-of-the-art cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis will be performed on the additive value of PET and DLS by both prospective and retrospective data collection