Clinical Trials Logo

Spine Disease clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Spine Disease.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04877470 Completed - Spinal Disease Clinical Trials

Baseline-characteristics of Patients Referred to a Secondary Spine Centre

CHAPARS
Start date: February 24, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

A retrospective cohort study will be conducted in Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, the Netherlands. All patients that were referred to the spine-centre between 01.01.2019 and 31.12.2019 will be included for analysis. This study aims to evaluate baseline characteristics, including baseline questionnaires, and information about the given treatments for all patients referred to the spine centre.

NCT ID: NCT04834141 Completed - Balance Clinical Trials

Correlation Between Thoracic Kyphosis Posture and Static Balance

Start date: October 13, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The effects of balanced posture and postural changes have been evaluated in specific populations with different factors that can affect body postures and balance, such as age, musculoskeletal system, and other metabolic diseases. Studies on postural kyphosis and balance involvement are very few in the literature especially in the health population. Of the few studies that have evaluated kyphosis and balance, most are limited by small sample size and the exclusion of men. Many have focused primarily on the geriatric population. The determination that the effect of thoracic kyphosis posture on trunk biomechanical alignment may be related to balance may contribute to new treatment recommendations in this area. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the thoracic kyphosis posture has an effect on static balance.

NCT ID: NCT04825522 Recruiting - Spine Disease Clinical Trials

The Effect of Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Spine Surgery

Start date: March 27, 2022
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Problem: Postoperative wound infection following various spinal surgeries is a serious complication. The incidence of post-surgical wounds in spine surgery is high, and various researchers have reported different infection rates. In addition, increased healthcare costs, prolonged lengths of stay in hospital, and reduced quality of life as a result of surgical site infections (SSI) are also major concerns. Several methods for avoiding SSI, such as betadine irrigation, vacuum-assisted closure, and intra-wound vancomycin powder, have been used to reduce the rate of wound infection in spine surgery. Use of local vancomycin has been popular because of its protective effects and lower cost. According to some reports, prophylactic administration of intra-wound vancomycin powder before wound closure is an effective method for decreasing postoperative wound infection rates; however, other studies have revealed a non-significant effect of intra-wound vancomycin use for decreasing the postsurgical wound infection rate. Solution: Therefore, the investigators will prospectively randomize all various types of spinal surgeries to patients who will receive intrawound vancomycin powder and control group who will not receive the powder and to see it's effect in reducing the post-surgical infection.

NCT ID: NCT04729049 Completed - Spondylolisthesis Clinical Trials

Erector Spinae Block vs Morphine in Vertebral Fixation

ATLANTE
Start date: February 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study aims to shed light about the potential role of Erector Spinae Block in the management of postoperative pain following vertebral fixation surgery via posterior approach. Patients will be randomized, the block will be performed before inducing general anesthesia, intraoperative management will be uniformed, while postoperative analgesia will compare cases (patients who received the block) versus controls (usual care with endovenous morphine infusion only).

NCT ID: NCT04691258 Completed - Low Back Pain Clinical Trials

Back Squat Exercise Treatment for Low Back Pain: Clinical Trial

Start date: November 30, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Summary: Low back pain is the leading cause of deficiency and loss of productivity worldwide. No evidence of any particular exercise was more effective than another for treating nonspecific low back pain. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of two resistance training protocols, with different techniques for performing lower limbs exercises, in improving vertebral posture and reducing symptoms of low back pain. Methods: Randomized parallel clinical trial with two arms: Restricted Group (GR) performed all squat and Stiff exercises with neutral vertebral posture and the Complete Group (CG) performed the same exercises prioritizing the complete range of motion. Both groups had a 12-week intervention with 36 resistance training sessions. This study was conducted between November 2020 and April 2021 in Goiás (Brazil). Thirty-two participants aged 18 to 69 years with nonspecific low back pain were recruited in the extension project of the Faculty of Physical Education and Dance of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG), at the Hospital das Clínicas - UFG and at the Campos Samambaia Health Center. To ensure blindness, participants did not know why the technique of movement between them was different. The movement technique was monitored by one teacher per participant throughout the training and cannot be altered by participants at risk of compromising the results. Spinal posture was evaluated by three-dimensional reconstruction and posture quantification using dynamic posture software and pain symptoms were evaluated by the Brief Pain Inventory and Rolland Morris Questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed in the Software SPSS and MATLAB. The Shapiro-Wilk and Bartlett tests were used to confirm the normal distribution and similar variances in the distribution of the data. The other quantitative and qualitative variables were analyzed by nonparametric statistical methods. Quantitative data with normal distribution were reported by means of means and standard deviation, minimum and maximum values, and the other data by median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum values. The pre-intervention conditions of the groups were compared by independent t-test. Two-way ANOVAs (groups X time) were used for group intervention effect comparisons for quantitative data variables with normal distribution. Significance level of 5%. The size of the effect of the results will be calculated using cohen's test.

NCT ID: NCT04490291 Completed - Chronic Pain Clinical Trials

An Observational Study of Integrated Chronic Pain Management in a Community Health Center

Start date: August 1, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

This was a prospective observational study with the primary objective of quantifying a change in pain scores after 6-12 months of two separate interventions within the study site (pain team and chiropractic team). Target enrollment was 30 participants for each intervention. The primary outcome was a change from baseline of the Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ), the study tool. Secondary outcomes were reduction of opioid dose by morphine equivalent daily dose, and its effect on PDQ scores.

NCT ID: NCT04379921 Active, not recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Improving Spine Surgical Care With Real-Time Objective Patient Tracking Using the Apple Watch

Start date: September 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

One of the primary goals of spine surgery is to reduce pain and increase mobility to improve patients' quality of life. Currently, there is no established method for surgeons to objectively track their patients' mobilization postoperatively. This study is the first prospective trial utilizing the Apple Watch to objectively track patients before and after elective spine surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the ability of patients to track their own activity and discuss with their surgeon objective mobilization goals will not only help patients achieve empowerment in their own care but also improve their overall satisfaction and self-reported outcomes after spine surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04227717 Active, not recruiting - Thoracic Diseases Clinical Trials

Studying a New Piece of Equipment That Can Help Plan Radiation Therapy of the Spine

Start date: January 9, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Participants will receive an MRI with a custom-built MRI coil for each participant. The purpose is to find out whether this custom-built MRI coil can help doctors see the different parts of the spine as well as or better than they can with standard CT myelograms.

NCT ID: NCT04161729 Completed - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Effects of Intraoperative Magnesium Sulfate on Perioperative Pain Relief After Spine Surgery

Start date: January 28, 2020
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The treatment of postoperative pain is increasingly based on a multimodal approach and although opioids remain the drug of choice, they are often used in combination with other analgesics (paracetamol, cyclooxygenase inhibitors or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and co-analgesic agents (clonidine and anti- NMDA such as ketamine or MgSO4). The rationale for combined analgesia is to achieve additive or synergistic analgesic properties while decreasing the incidence of side effects by reducing the dose of each agent. Nociceptive stimuli are known to activate the release of the excitatory amino acid glutamate in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. The resultant activation of NMDA receptors causes calcium entry into the cell and triggers central sensitisation. This mechanism is involved in the perception of pain and mainly accounts for its persistence during the postoperative period. Although magnesium is not a primary analgesic in itself, it enhances the analgesic actions of more established analgesics as an adjuvant agent. Magnesium produces a voltage-dependent block of NMDA receptors and has been reported to have analgesic properties that might be related to this inhibiting property. Magnesium sulfate has been reported to be effective in perioperative pain treatment and in blunting somatic, autonomic and endocrine reflexes provoked by noxious stimuli. When magnesium was used intraoperatively, many researchers reported that it reduced the requirement for anesthetics and/or muscle relaxants. Intraoperative use of magnesium sulfate can also be associated with decreased incidences of nausea and vomiting after surgery, which could have been due to the lower consumption of anesthetics (i.e. volatile agents), rather than any antiemetic effect of magnesium sulfate. In addition, perioperative i.v. administration of magnesium sulfate has another advantageous effect, as it decreases the incidence of shivering by up to 70-90%. Previous studies investigating the analgesic efficacy of MgSO4 in general, gynaecological, ophthalmic and orthopaedic surgery have shown conflicting results, while reports regarding spine surgery are extremely limited. Our study was designed to investigate the effects of MgSO4 on perioperative pain relief and postoperative quality of recovery after lumbar laminectomy surgery.

NCT ID: NCT03848377 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Neurological Disorder

EMG and SSEP Device (EPAD® 2.0) for Intraoperative Monitoring of Patient Undergoing Spinal Nerve Spine Surgery

Start date: July 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

In patients undergoing spine surgery, spinal nerve roots and spinal cord are vulnerable to surgical insults especially for instrumentation and may lead to long term sequelae. The incidence of clinical peripheral neuropathy after cervical spine surgery has been reported up to 30%. Intraoperatively, spinal cord and nerves function can be monitored using electromyography (EMG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and thereby, intervention can be made to potentially reduce the incidence of adverse neurological sequelae. However, conventional EMG and SSEP monitoring requires presence of a trained EP technician, use of needle electrodes and currently bulky EP equipment and is thus not practical for routine clinical usage. In this study, the invesitgators will assess the clinical feasibility of using a novel miniaturized and automated EMG/SSEP device (EPAD® 2.0) in spine surgical patients.