View clinical trials related to Speech Therapy.
Filter by:Our study will provide precise and intensive speech rehabilitation treatment program to patients with speech disorders after stroke, and compare clinical evaluations with the conventional speech therapy patient group. Clinical evaluation tools will be performed before and after the treatment for all patients - K-Western Aphasia Battery for aphasia assessment tools - Cerebral blood flow changes with near-infrared spectroscopy
Speech therapy in children with a palate deals with two scientific challenges that will be addressed in this project. The first challenge is selecting the best speech approach for a child with a specific cleft speech characteristic (CSC). Many speech therapists use a 'one-size-fits-all' approach to treat compensatory CSCs resulting in poor short- and long-term speech outcomes. To increase the effectiveness and quality of cleft speech care, it is necessary to find the best match between a specific therapy and a given type of CSC. Therefore, this proposal will compare the effect of 3 different speech approaches on the speech and quality of life in Dutch speaking children with different types of CSCs. The second challenge is selecting the best speech approach to enhance long-term learning and transfer of newly established speech skills to untrained consonants. To date, research mainly focused on immediate therapy effects. It is unknown if permanent speech changes occur. Hence, this project will also investigate the short-term and long-term learning effects (retention and transfer) of the different speech approaches from the first objective. This proposal will improve evidence-based and patient-tailored cleft speech therapy.
An accumulation of research evidence has pointed to parent-implemented communication treatment as effective in reducing the severity of social communication deficits in preschool children with ASD. Despite even high-quality evidence, real-world translation to clinical practice remains challenging, especially for children from lower-income families, for two reasons. First, the treatment outcome is highly variable despite study-level efficacy data, most likely due to unique child and parent factors that make treatment response uneven across individual children. Second, the cost of intervention with the largest effect sizes remains high due to its one-on-one format. With the overarching goal to reduce cost and to increase treatment effectiveness at the individual-child level, this project will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of two options for intervention to address two specific objectives. The investigators will first ascertain whether parent-implemented communication treatment taught by a speech therapist in a Group format (up to 8 families learning together) is more effective than treatment learnt by the parents themselves in a Passive Control format (learning the same materials without the guidance of a therapist) at the study level. The investigators will then evaluate what combinations of parent and child behavioral factors determine which format of intervention is likely to be more effective at the individual-child level. It is likely that not all families require the more costly Group format of intervention. Machine learning analytics with cross-validation will be used in constructing predictive models of treatment response, which will increase the likelihood of these models being generalizable to new patients. This study will be among the first examples of fulfilling the promise of Precision Medicine in providing guidance to patients and families with developmental disorders not about whether to receive intervention but which option for intervention to receive in the context of multiple options. This predict-to prescribe approach of ASD intervention will likely lead to a paradigm shift in clinical practice and ultimately result in lowering the overall cost and increasing the effectiveness of intervention for children with ASD as individuals.
An accumulation of research evidence has pointed to parent-implemented communication treatment as effective in reducing the severity of social communication deficits in preschool children with ASD. Despite even high-quality evidence, real-world translation to clinical practice remains challenging, especially for children from lower-income families, for two reasons. First, the treatment outcome is highly variable despite study-level efficacy data, most likely due to unique child and parent factors that make treatment response uneven across individual children. Second, the cost of intervention with the largest effect sizes remains high due to its one-on-one format. With the overarching goal to reduce cost and to increase treatment effectiveness at the individual-child level, this project will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of two options for intervention to address two specific objectives. The investigators will first ascertain whether parent-implemented communication treatment taught by a speech therapist in an Individual (one-on-one) format is more effective than treatment taught in a Group format (up to 8 families learning together) at the study level. The Individual format is at least 4 times more expensive than the Group format; its relative treatment effect must be empirically ascertained to justify its cost. The investigators will then evaluate what combinations of parent and child behavioral and neural factors determine which format of intervention is likely to be more effective at the individual-child level. It is likely that not all families require the more costly Individual format of intervention. Machine-learning analytics with cross-validation will be used in constructing predictive models of treatment response, which will increase the likelihood of these models being generalizable to new patients. This study will be among the first examples of fulfilling the promise of Precision Medicine in providing guidance to patients and families with developmental disorders not about whether to receive intervention but which option for intervention to receive in the context of multiple options. This predict-to-prescribe approach of ASD intervention will likely lead to a paradigm shift in clinical practice and ultimately result in lowering the overall cost and increasing the effectiveness of intervention for children with ASD as individuals.
Background: After a period of coma, patients with severe brain injury may present disorders of consciousness (DOC). A wide proportion of these patients also suffer from severe dysphagia. Assessment and therapy of swallowing disabilities of DOC patients are essential because dysphagia has major functional consequences and comorbidities. Dysphagia evaluation in patients with DOC is hampered by the lack of adapted tools. The first aim of the study was to develop a new tool, the SWallowing Assessment in Disorders Of Consciousness (SWADOC), and propose a validation protocol. The SWADOC tool has been developed to help therapists to apprehend components related to swallowing in patients with DOC. The second aim is to appreciate the relationship between patients' level of consciousness and SWADOC items and scores. Method/design: In this multicentric prospective cohort, 104 patients with DOC will be tested three times during two consecutive days with the SWADOC tool. Statistical analyses will focus on the reliability and validity of the SWADOC tool, especially the intra and inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, measures of dispersion and concurrent validity with the FOTT Swallowing Assessment of Saliva (FOTT-SAS). The level of consciousness will be assessed with the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) Discussion: The assessment of swallowing abilities among patients with DOC is the first necessary step towards the development of an individualized dysphagia care plan. A validated scoring tool will be essential for clinicians to better apprehend dysphagia in DOC patients and to document the evolution of their disorders.
To study the effect of combined tDCS plus speech therapy compared to sham-tDCS plus speech therapy in subacute stroke patients suffering from moderate or severe aphasia. The patients will be randomized by a computer-generated lot. Assessment will be performed at study onset, after six weeks at the end of the specific intervention and 4 months after stroke onset for follow-up.