View clinical trials related to Socket Preservation.
Filter by:the aim of this study is to establish if there are clinical, radio-graphical and histomorphometrical differences between using Allogenic Demineralized Dentin matrix versus Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) as a clinical application in alveolar bone regeneration procedures related to implant dentistry, including socket preservation, alveolar ridge augmentation, after tooth extraction in the esthetic zone.Will ridge preservation using Allogeneic Dentin Matrix be more effective than Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in managing the post extraction hard tissue alterations? The initial therapy consists of periodontal treatment (phase I therapy) including supragingival scaling, subgingival debridement if needed, adjustment of faulty restoration and polishing. The mechanical plaque control instructions for each patient include brushing and interdental cleaning techniques. alginate impression will be taken to fabricate an acrylic stent to be used as reference for measurements of width of ridge clinically. Flapless and atraumatic tooth extraction will be initiated, Then the socket will be filled either with Allogeneic Dentin Matrix or Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) up to the crestal level of then bone followed by placement of a collagen membrane to cover the socket. criss-cross horizontal mattress suturing technique Intervention group: The socket will be filled with Allogeneic Dentin Matrix Control group: The socket will be filled with Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA). For both groups, All the subjects will be evaluated at pre-surgical, baseline and 6 months post surgical months for clinical parameters and baseline( immediate post-surgical and 6 months post-surgical . Outcomes: Change in ridge width clinically after 6 months, Change in the radiographic buccal vertical bone level, Change in the radiographic palatal vertical bone level,Change in the radiographic horizontal bone level,Percentage of new vital bone formation,Percentage of residual bone graft and Implant Primary Stability.
- The aim is to evaluate post extraction hard tissue changes following ridge preservation using partially demineralized dentin block versus L-PRF block in intact socket in the esthetic zone. - The main question: In patients with un restorable tooth, Will ridge preservation using partially demineralized dentin block be more effective than L-PRF block in managing the post extraction hard tissue alterations? - After enrolment, periodontal and radiographic examination and patients with badly un-restorative tooth in the esthetic zone will be identified. These patients will undergo to mesio-distal distance between adjacent teeth, corono-apical height of bone, presence of labial undercut, dehiscence, or fenestration and Relation to adjacent teeth measurements using trans gingival probing technique, and preapical radiograph or CBCT . - In both groups, the desired tooth will be extracted under local anesthesia using peritomies and surgical forceps. - In intervention group: the teeth will be cleaned and dried, and then the dentin will be ground to obtain particles of a certain size then partially demineralize dentin will obtained by using a tooth transformer machine. At the same time, blood samples are collected and processed to obtain fibrin membranes rich in platelets and leukocytes. This tissue is then mixed with partially demineralized dentin to create a solid mass called a "dentin block". During the process of preserving the alveolar bumps after extraction, this solid mass "dentin mass" is placed inside the dental pockets and covered with fibrin membranes rich in platelets and white blood cells, then 5/0 proline suture are used to fix the fibrin membranes and dentin mass in place. After the recovery period "4-6 months", a biopsy is taken for some cases from the site of the operation for histological evaluation during implant placement. - In control group: the same steps as the first group will be used, but by replacing the partially demineralized dental graft with a xenograft. - Outcomes: Radiographic vertical buccal bone changes, vertical Palatal bone changes, horizontal bone changes, Percentage of new vital bone formation, Percentage of residual bone graft, Implant Primary Stability. The results directly postoperative and 4-6 months postoperatively.
Thirty patients will be selected from outpatient clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University seeking for extraction of non-restorable mandibular posterior teeth For the 1st group: the socket will be grafted with completely demineralized dentin graft after 3 days of extraction, followed by delayed implant placement after 4 months. For the 2nd group: the socket will be grafted with partially demineralized dentin graft in in the same day of extraction, followed by delayed implant placement after 4 months.
The primary objective of this proposed clinical trial is to provide detailed comparison and evidence of new bone formation in patients undergoing socket preservation utilizing MinerOss® X Plug with and without Striate+ Membrane to maintain ridge dimension after a tooth extraction.
Many dentists, clinicians and researchers have conducted numerous trials, and put several materials and procedures under the test, in an attempt to preserve vertical and/or horizontal extraction sockets dimensions. The clinical consequences of post-extraction remodeling may affect the outcome of the ensuing therapies aimed at restoring the lost dentition, either by limiting the bone availability for ideal implant placement or by compromising the aesthetic result of the prosthetic restorations. In an attempt for ridge/socket preservation of a freshly extracted tooth socket/bed, this study aims to assess and compare between using autogenous tooth graft added with Hyaluronic acid, and the usage of the standardized autogenous tooth graft alone, regarding the potency, preservative feature, and quality of bone healing, density, and deposition. For a better restorative outcome using a delayed implant placement later on in the edentulous area.
After tooth extraction, the residual alveolar ridge generally provides limited bone volume because of ongoing, progressive bone resorption. Healing events within post-extraction sockets reduce the dimensions of the socket over time. Therefore, socket preservation became an indispensable procedure as well as fundamental to prevent bone loss following tooth extraction. Preservation, by the name, is the maintenance of the socket, which is essentially the height and width of the gap that is left after the tooth is removed. It is done by placing a graft material or scaffold immediately into the socket of an extracted tooth to presto preserve bone height, width and density
The primary objective of the present study is to clinically and radiographically evaluate the efficacy of autogenous tooth graft obtained from bone mill and dental grinder to preserve alveolar ridge dimensions in extraction sockets.
compare the effect of application of A-PRF in socket preservation after atraumatic tooth extraction and natural healing regarding to bone remodeling . Null hypotheis, after atraumatic extraction, socket with advanced PRF has no difference with socket with blood clot in primary outcome
The research is about socket preservation using the ice cream cone technique including collagen membrane and xenograft compared to spontaneous healing.
Alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction has the ability to maintain the ridge dimensions and allow the implant placement in an ideal position fulfilling both functional and aesthetic results. Postextraction socket healing commonly results in resorption of the alveolar ridge. To prevent this clinical situation, different authors have described several surgical procedures, ranging from regenerative techniques for socket preservation to immediate implant placement. Regenerative techniques have been widely tested in controlled and uncontrolled studies with various materials and clinical approaches: bone grafting alone, including autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts; membrane alone, whether absorbable or not; and membrane in conjunction with grafting.