View clinical trials related to Socket Preservation.
Filter by:Inadequate ridge width to allow implant placement, it noted that when extraction takes place and ridge preservation is not utilized the site of extraction could lose 40% to 60% of bone height and width within 2 to 3 years and subsequent loss of 0.25% to 0.5% annually. it reported as much as 4 mm loss of ridge width in extraction alone sites within 6 months. Using an atraumatic tooth extraction technique preserves osseous walls thereby improving the chances of osseous graft success. The goal of ridge preservation is minimizing bone loss to preserve the maximum final, healed ridge dimensions. Socket preservation is done using a hard tissue graft like xenograft bone or synthetic bone substitutes and prevent hazard of surgical intervention which needed during implant loading due to bone resorption.
There is limited data regarding socket preservation in three wall defects and no enough evidence of implant placement in previously regenerated area with allograft. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to analyze and compare dimensional changes in extractions sites with buccal bone defects > 5 mm left untreated (simultaneous regeneration during implant placement) or treated using a mineralized allograft.
Despite the numerous studies describing the benefits of PRGF (plasma rich in growth factors) and Statins separately , there has been a lack of clinical investigation into the simultaneous use of these agents in socket augmentation. Therefore the main objective of this study is to evaluate socket bone dimensions and quality following the use of PRGF derived fibrin scaffold as a carrier for Atorvastatin in socket augmentation clinically and histomorphometrically.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinically, histologically and radiographically the healing of extraction sockets with Zimmer's Puros® allograft compared to creos™ (creo™ Nobel Biocare,), a low-cost allograft material, 90 days following exodontia.