Clinical Trials Logo

SLAP Lesion clinical trials

View clinical trials related to SLAP Lesion.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06300190 Not yet recruiting - SLAP Lesion Clinical Trials

Biceps Tenodesis Alone Versus Biceps Tenodesis and Labrum Repair in Superior Labrum Anteroposterior (SLAP) Lesion Type IV

Start date: March 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Aim of this study is comparing results Biceps Tenodesis Alone Versus Biceps Tenodesis and labrum Repair in Superior Labrum Anteroposterior (SLAP) Lesion Type IV

NCT ID: NCT05584553 Enrolling by invitation - Clinical trials for Biceps Tendon Disorder

PMCF Study on the Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits Data of the ToggleLoc™ 2.9mm and JuggerLoc™ in the Shoulder

Start date: December 2, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The study is a multicenter, retrospective, non-randomized, non-controlled and consecutive series post-market study. The purpose of this study is to collect data confirming safety, performance and clinical benefits of the ToggleLoc 2.9 mm and the JuggerLoc Soft Tissue Systems when used for soft tissue to bone fixation in the shoulder. The primary objective is the assessment of performance by analyzing soft tissue to bone healing in the shoulder. The secondary objective is the assessment of safety and clinical benefits. Safety will be evaluated by recording and analyzing the incidence and frequency of complications and adverse events. Relation of the events to device, instrumentation and/or procedure will be specified. Clinical benefits will be assessed by recording patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the longest follow-up after surgery (minimum one year).

NCT ID: NCT03985839 Active, not recruiting - Rotator Cuff Tears Clinical Trials

Safety and Performance of MICRORAPTOR™ Suture Anchors in Shoulder and Hip

Start date: August 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is a prospective, multi-center, PMCF study to evaluate the safety and performance of the MICRORAPTOR REGENESORB suture anchors, MICRORAPTOR Knotless REGENESORB suture anchors, and MICRORAPTOR Knotless PEEK suture anchors implanted in 300 subjects needing reattachment of soft tissue to bone.

NCT ID: NCT03594071 Completed - Clinical trials for Acetabular Labrum Tear

S&P of Q-Fix™ All-Suture Anchor System

Start date: August 31, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Post-market clinical follow-up needed to address existing clinical data and gaps on the existing Q-Fix™ device and meet existing MDD/MEDDEV requirements

NCT ID: NCT03525275 Completed - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Effect of Battlefield Acupuncture and Physical Therapy Versus Physical Therapy Alone After Shoulder Surgery

Start date: August 15, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA) in addition to usual post-surgical shoulder physical therapy compared to a standard shoulder rehabilitation program in reducing medication use and pain in patients who have undergone shoulder surgery. Measurements of medication (opioid, NSAID, acetaminophen, etc.) use (daily number of pills consumed), pain rating, patient specific functional scale and global rating of change will be taken at 24, 72 hours, 7 days, 14 days and at six weeks post-surgery. It is hypothesized that the inclusion of Battlefield Acupuncture will result in a decrease in medication use and post-surgical pain when compared to rehabilitation alone. The population for this study is male and female DoD beneficiaries, ages 17-55 (17 if cadet) that are not participating in other shoulder research studies. The subjects in the experimental group will receive Battlefield Acupuncture in addition to their respective post-surgical shoulder rehabilitation protocol.

NCT ID: NCT03189147 Terminated - SLAP Lesion Clinical Trials

BicepsTenodesis vs. Biceps Debridement in Combined RC Tears and SLAP Lesions

Start date: January 15, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The appropriate treatment of labral lesions such as SLAP tears in patients undergoing RC tears repair is controversial. Most surgeons are reluctant to repair RC and SLAP tears simultaneously due to the high likelihood of prolonged postoperative immobilization, stiffness and poor clinical outcomes. The current standard care interventions include debridement, biceps tenotomy or tenodesis rather than surgical repair of SLAP tears. Simple debridement is a low cost and time-saving procedure that has the advantage of maintaining the anatomy of the long head of biceps (LHB), a muscle that acts as an active depressor of the head of the humerus in patients with RC tears. Biceps tenotomy is also low cost and time-saving; however, since the LHB is released from its attachment in the shoulder joint, the anatomy is not preserved and results in decreased strength and possible development of a 'Popeye' deformity. Biceps tenodesis has higher costs and time than the other two approaches, but has the advantage of preserving the LHB anatomy and power, and a lower possibility of developing complications. Finally, labral repair has the highest costs and associated surgical time and may lead to increase stiffness after surgery, particularly in patients over 45 years old. Currently, the standard care of the surgeons involved in this study is to use either debridement or biceps tenodesis to address labral lesions in patients undergoing surgery for their RC tear. Based on the current evidence and current practice in our facility, we aim to compare the efficacy of tenodesis versus debridement in patients with combined RC tear, degenerative labrum (SLAP tears) and a normal biceps tendon.