View clinical trials related to Shock.
Filter by:Each year approximately 3000 patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG). In-hospital mortality of patients with emergency admission approaches 25%. Predicting outcome in the first hours after ICU admission, however, remains a challenge. An vast amount of scoring systems has been developed for mortality prediction. Well known models, such as the LODS, MODS, CCI, SOFA, ODIN and the different generations of the APACHE, MPM and SAPS, are increasingly compared with new models, such as the SICULA, ICNARC, ANZROD and SMS-ICU. The predictive value of scoring systems deteriorates over time due to changes in patient characteristics and treatment, making it crucial to update existing models or develop new models. Other reasons given for the need of models are the complexity and lack of availability of variables in some of the existing scoring systems, the better discriminating value while using simple, standardly measured variables, and the limited generalizability of some scoring systems in different patient populations. Not only are simple systems (such as the CIS and SMS-ICU) found to be at least as predictive for mortality as complex models such as the APACHE IV, but, while using simplified systems, mortality can also be reasonably predicted within only a few hours after admission. Both simplicity and the potential to predict mortality shortly after admission increase the usability, and consequently the reliability, of those prediction models. This increases the potential of those models to be used in practice. Most studies however compare only two to four models in their patient population and lack in their description of the performance of the different models. Parameters necessary to compare the performance of models are at least calibration, discrimination, negative predicting value, positive predicting value, sensitivity and specificity. Lacking an adequate description of the performance of the model limits to what extent the study can be used to compare models in different populations. Thus, all usable models should be compared with newly build models, and the performance of the different models should be extensively described to allow comparison of the models. Not only models based on simple, readily available variables available within hours after admission are promising, but also the concept of combining measurements straight after ICU admission with information on the course of illness. It is likely that the course of a variable over time is more indicative than a static measurement. This study will provide a structure in which every patient admitted to the ICU will be investigated and included within 3 hours and after 12 hours after admission, making longitudinal measurements and various add-on studies possible. Longitudinal measurements are the first example of an add-on study; another example is the capability of nurses and physicians to predict outcome. Current evidence suggests that physicians might predict mortality more accurately than scorings systems. This finding may, however, be highly biased, since at least physicians play a major role in end-of-life decision making. More recent studies also focus on the accuracy of nurses in predicting mortality, with diverse outcomes. The role of other health care professionals, like residents and students, remain to be studied. Implementing a systematic data collection process is the first step towards making data-driven research possible, a growing need in medical disciplines such as critical care, which requires increasingly more accurate prognostic models. Therefore, the aim of this study is to systematically collect data of all selected variables, thus minimizing incompleteness, and allowing for the calculation of mortality prediction scores according to currently available mortality or severity of disease prediction models. Moreover, during investigation reliability of measurements could be checked for validity. This creates the possibility to compare the performance of all models in one population and identify models which are useful to predict severity of disease. A registry will be created with this primary objective which also provides the opportunity to start multiple ''add-on'' studies for specific research questions. Examples of add-on studies are 1) the association between time-dependent variables which are longitudinally measured, and mortality/acute and chronic co-morbidity, 2) the association between fluid status and acute kidney injury, and 3) not only the capability of the treating physician to predict mortality, but also the capability of the nurses, residents and students to do so. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to expand the infrastructure for a registry with longitudinal and repeated measurements, shortly after admittance, which is flexible to incorporate temporarily added specific research questions on the outcome of critically ill patients.
Multicenter randomized double blind trial comparing intravenous cangrelor and oral ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by initial cardiogenic shock and treated with primary angioplasty.
The purpose of this research study is to determine whether patients who receive thiamine (vitamin B1), vitamin C and hydrocortisone while in septic shock have improved outcomes compared to hydrocortisone alone. A recently published article "Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C and Thiamine for the treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock," suggested substantial mortality reduction (78%). We wish to test the hypothesis that mortality reduction is at least 25% in a prospective randomized trial. Other important sub-aims include the testing whether the protocol reduces the time on pressors agents, reduces the trajectory of the SOFA score, or reduces the trajectory of procalcitonin.
The purpose of this multicenter prospective study is to determine if the decision of transient circulatory support (TCS) in cardiogenic shock is relevant. TCS is a recommended treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock but precise indications are not definitively founded. Some studies described patients with TCS in order to establish mortality predictive scores (ENCOURAGE, SAVE), but no study has assessed the clinical relevance of the TCS decision yet. Therefore, The investigators propose to compare the characteristics and the follow-up of patients in acute cardiogenic shock, once TCS implantation was decided or not by the heart team.
ULIS-1 is an open-label pilot study concerning utility of molar sodium lactate in fluid balance in septic shock patients
Anaphylaxis is an acute serious allergic reaction, with multi-organ system manifestations caused by the release of chemical mediators and it is potentially fatal . Between 5% and 14% of patients may experience a recurrence of anaphylaxis 8-12 hours after the initial presentation, called biphasic (late-phase) . The mainstay of treatment for children experiencing anaphylaxis remains adrenaline and H1-antihistamines. Corticosteroids are not life-saving and do not have an immediate effect on the symptoms of anaphylaxis but may help reduce or prevent a biphasic "late phase" reaction . The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral glucocorticoids in prevention of the second phase or biphasic reaction of anaphylaxis, as compared to placebo in children, presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PEC Al-Sadd) with mild to moderate anaphylaxis (Prospective Study). Patients will be randomized to either one of the two treatment: Treatment 1: Dexamethasone 0.6mg/kg oral. Treatment 2 : Placebo All patients will be urgently treated for anaphylaxis according to guideline protocol. Enrolled patients will be given one of the study medications orally, and he /she will observe in the observation room with cardiac monitor and close monitoring by nurse. The treating physician will discharge patient when he/she looks well, breathing comfortably, has oxygen saturation >94%, stable blood pressure and no gastrointestinal or neurological manifestation. Discharge patients will be sent home on anti-histamine (cetirizine) for 5days. All patients will be followed up for one week post discharge by a phone call asking about the general condition, relapse of symptoms, or need for readmission.
Patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit have a high risk to develop acute kidney injury (AKI) and AKI is an independent risk factor of mortality. Given the absence of validated pharmacological treatments for limiting the progression of AKI or for accelerating recovery from AKI, early intervention and the restoration of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in this context of septic shock might improve the patients' prognosis. One major challenge is to determine whether or not the AKI is reversible (return to normal function KDIGO 0 within 72 hours). In this retrospective study the investigators will analyze all patients admitted for a septic shock in three French ICUs between the 1st january 2014 and 01st January 2017 who developed an AKI (KDIGO ≥1) at admission and who had a determination of the urine concentration of TIMP2*IGFBP7 at admission. The investigators will determine the best threshold of TIMP2*IGFBP7 to distinguish the population of patients who will return to normal kidney function within 72 hours (KDIGO 0).
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac rhythm disorder particularly common in intensive care patients. Some meta-analyzes report a prevalence of new onset AF ranging from 4.5% to 29.5% in polyvalent intensive care. In our department, a recent month-long survey showed that more than 30% of the patients who were unhealthy on admission suffer from an episode of new onset AF during their stay. The occurrence of AF in intensive care has a pejorative effect on the patient's outcome, and this through two factors. On the one hand, the decreasing of cardiac output by degradation of the ventricular filling in diastole time, on the other hand the FA is responsible for an over-risk of ischemic stroke. In fact, it has been shown that the occurrence of new onset AF in intensive care is associated with a higher level of severity and a higher mortality. It is also important to underline the medico-economic impact of this rhythmic disorder as complication of shock due to the frequent prescription of various anti-arrhythmic or anticoagulant medication. Various factors have been mentioned to explain the frequent occurrence of AF in shocked patients. The shock state, whatever its origin, is characterized by the occurrence of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome in which is observed a particularly important releasing of stress hormones and endogenous catecholamines involved in the occurrence of a rapid multi-organ failure without treatment. Systemic humoral elements are possibly involved in the occurrence of new onset AF, such as high level of inflammation that characterizes shock states. In addition, physiological factors such as hypoxia, hypovolemia, hyperthermia or ionic disorders are also implicated, but their non-systemic association with intensive care new onset FA suggests that humoral factors may play an important and independent role. Among these humoral factors, the proteins of chromogranin family particularly Vasostatin-I (VS-I) seem possibly involved in the genesis of AF in the aggressed intensive care patients. Several studies have highlighted the beneficial regulatory role of VS-I on the cardiovascular system, particularly in a study on a canine model Stavrakis and al. have shown the VS-I protective role on the FA occurrence. However, as has been demonstrated in a prospective study in intensive care, the rates of circulating VS-I were significantly higher in the most severe patients and those whose prognosis was the most pejorative, thus not supporting the thesis of the protective effect of VS-I. An explanation exists for this discrepancy: VS-I is present in two distinct forms in the circulating blood. In vitro work carried out within the U1121 INSERM team with has made it possible to highlight the coexistence of two forms of VS-1: an aggregated "inactive" form and an "active" disaggregated form. In our hypothesis, the inactive aggregated form would be predominant during the states of acute pathological aggressions such as the shock and thus would not exert the anti arrhythmic and cardio protector expected functions. The first aim of our study is therefore to confirm that the onset of new onset FA during the shock state is associated with a significant decrease in the VS-I plasma level in its monomeric form called "active", even when high levels of total VS-1 are detected by ELISA in the plasma of patients. Our project is a pilot and unpublished translational work. The link between VS-I and new onset AF in intensive care severe patients has never been studied in vivo, and the recent work of the associated INSERM team provides advances in understanding the function of VS-I over time shock conditions. Nevertheless, our experimental hypothesis require confirmation in humans. A better understanding of the factors influencing the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias in intensive care patients is a major ambition as it would be a step forward in the development of a preventive strategy or new treatment for the benefit of patients.
Use Mannose Binding Lectin (MBL) as a biomarker to measure levels of Pathogen- Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMP) during septic shock. This will allow evaluating interest of this biomarker to monitor and manage a septic shock. Consecutive patients admitted for sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Department will be included. This biomarker will be compared to all the parameters monitored usually for these patients in standard care.
To investigate changes in the concentration of glucose, lactate, pyruvate and glycerol in the extracellular fluid of the skeletal muscle following Dexmedetomidine administration in patients with septic shock.