View clinical trials related to Shock.
Filter by:Background: Electrical stimulation has been used in critical patients as an adjunct strategy of early rehabilitation. In septic or septic shock patients there are reports of only two studies in the literature, with conflicting results. Objective: To evaluate the effects of electrical stimulation in the prevention of muscle mass loss in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis or septic shock. Methods: This is a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Thirty-six patients with a diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock (including patients with sepsis due to the new coronavirus - COVID-19) will be randomly assigned to experimental group and sham group. They will be evaluated in relation to muscle mass, peripheral muscle strength and functional status. They will also be submitted to the collection of inflammatory, metabolic, damage and muscular trophism markers. Expected results: Electrical stimulation is expected to be able to prevent loss of muscle mass in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis or septic shock. In addition, it is expected to be able to preserve strength in this population without increasing the pro-inflammatory or metabolic response.
An observational study of the state of the renal and systemic circulations in patients with early septic shock. Both macro and microvascular parameters will be assessed using echocardiography, sublingual incident dark field video-microscopy and renal contrast enhanced ultrasound. Patients will be categorised by KDIGO degree of kidney injury at Day 7 and stratified. Haemodynamic and perfusion based variables over time for these groups will be compared to assess the impact of changes in same on the development of AKI. Lab based work to quantify renal injury biomarkers will also be undertaken.
Despite evidence of the physiologic benefits and possible lower mortality associated with low chloride solutions, normal saline remains the most wildly used fluid in the world. Given uncertainty about the impact of lower chloride versus higher chloride solutions on mortality, it is unlikely that clinical practice will change without new and direct randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence. Editorials published in leading critical care journals have called for RCT's to address this important clinical question. This trial will directly compare low chloride versus normal chloride for resuscitation in septic shock on patient-important outcomes such as mortality and AKI.
Fluid challenge is often carried out in septic shock patients. Its responsiveness usually requires invasive monitoring. The pulmonary artery catheter(PAC) is the most effective means of monitoring.To use non-invasive methods is very tempting. Investigators hypothesize that venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference,venous-to-arterial carbon oxygen difference, central venous-arterial carbon dioxide to arterial-venous oxygen content ratio and Central Venous SO2 variations provides feasible estimation on fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
Septic shock is a devastating condition often observed in ICU. It is characterized by pro-inflammatory and immune responses, organ failures, high incidence of AKI and lethality. Fluid resuscitation is pivotal as supportive therapy. At present, there are no effective therapies to improve survival of such clinical condition, often characterized by a mortality as high as 40% during the first 90 days from diagnosis. This project proposes a large 2-by-2 factorial randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of albumin and the low- chloride balanced crystalloid solutions (either Ringer Lactate, Ringer Acetate, or Crystalsol - BAL) in septic shock. The investigators have recently concluded a multicenter, randomized trial, the ALBIOS trial, in which, in a post-hoc analysis, albumin, in addition to crystalloids, reduced 90-day mortality in patients with septic shock, as compared to crystalloids alone (Caironi P et al, 2014). Crystalloids with supra-physiological chloride content may deteriorate renal perfusion, increasing the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality.
This study has been approved as a nested substudy of a multicenter trial (CORVICTES, Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03592693). The current, randomized, placebo-controlled study will compare steroids/vitamin C versus placebo/placebo in septic shock, with respect to cerebral autoregulation, biomarkers, and functional outcome. The following hypotheses will be tested: The steroids/vitamin C/thiamine intervention may result in attenuation of the septic shock-associated impairment in cerebral autoregulation; and 2) The increased frequency of intact cerebral autoregulation in the intervention group may result in more neurologic failure free days and ventilator free days during a 60-day follow-up; improved survival to hospital discharge with good functional outcome; and better patient-reported health-related outcomes at 90-day follow-up.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of LJPC-501 infusion on mean arterial pressure (MAP) as assessed by standard of care vasopressor dose reduction in pediatric patients with catecholamine-resistant hypotension (CRH). In addition, this study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of LJPC-501 in pediatric patients, evaluate changes in catecholamine and other vasopressor doses over time, evaluate the change in MAP over time, and the change in Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) scores.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of terlipressin compared to standard regimen in hepatic patients with septic shock. Another aim is to compare the mortality rate & the effects on renal functions in both groups.
Prior data has shown that both corticosteroids and vitamin C reduce the activation of nuclear factor ƘB (NFƘB), thereby ultimately attenuating the systemic inflammatory response to sepsis/septic shock and augmenting the responsiveness to vasopressors. Therefore, the current investigators hypothesized that the combined use of vitamin C and stress-dose hydrocortisone may improve the outcomes of patients with septic shock. The investigators intend to perform a randomized, multicenter, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vitamin C plus stress-dose hydrocortisone or placebo plus placebo for a total of four days after randomization of patients fulfilling the current consensus criteria for septic shock. The primary outcome will be hospital mortality, whereas the scondary outcomes will include 60-day, 28-day mortality, time to vasopressor cessation, procalcitonin clearance and change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score over the first 4 days after randomization, neurologic failure-free days, and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the hospital. Target enrollment will be 400 patients.
Circulatory shocks (CS) are life-threatening, acute organ dysfunction. Advances in critical care medicine have decreased early hospital mortality, increasing the number of surviving patients. Regrettably, these survivors are at increased risk of new infections but also of cardiovascular disease. The investigators hypothesize that CS with multi-organ dysfunction is associated with premature senescence of endothelial cells and immune cells and promotes endothelial thrombogenicity and immunosenescence leading to cardiovascular disease and secondary infections. The aim of this work is therefore to evaluate the contribution of endothelial and leucocytes senescence to the occurrence of secondary events (infectious and cardiovascular) in patients with a CS. It will provide a better understanding of the pathogenesis of cardiovascular and immune diseases following a CS, likely to guide new management strategies to prevent their occurrence.