View clinical trials related to Septic Shock.
Filter by:The complexity of pediatric septic shock arise from its varied pathophysiology, which includes systemic inflammation, cardiovascular collapse, and multiple organ dysfunction. Current standard treatments, which primarily focusedon fluid resuscitation, had exhibited several problems. Excessive fluid resuscitation has been associated with complications such as fluid overload, which may cause conditions such as pulmonary edema and organ dysfunction, leading to worsened outcomes. This emphasizes the need for alternative therapeutic strategies that can effectively manage hemodynamic instability while minimizing the risks of fluid overload. In adult patients, the early use of vasopressors has been recommended to restore perfusion in patients with septic shock, compared to repeated fluid loading. However, previous research on the use of norepinephrine and the preload status of the pediatric population is still limited. In addition, the use of fluid resuscitation does not always exhibit the desirable response, which is the increase of blood pressure. This is because the blood pressure depends not only on the stroke volume but also the vascular resistance. Consequently, predicting blood pressure elevation after fluid resuscitation remains challenging. Based on previous research, arterial elastance has the potential to predict the increase of blood pressure in response to fluid administration. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effects of early administration of fluid resuscitation combined with norepinephrine in pediatric septic shock patients and evaluate the useof arterial elastance as a predictor of blood pressure response following fluid resuscitation. Finally, this study will also evaluate the parameters such as stroke volume index, cardiac index, lactate clearance , arterial elastance in pediatric patients with septic shock who were resuscitated using the hemodynamic support guidelines according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocols.
Sepsis is a critical burden for a healthcare. From 2000 to 2020, the number of publications and clinical studies on the topic of Sepsis and septic shock on the National Library of Medicine resource The National Center for Biotechnology Information has tripled. Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that causes significant pathophysiological changes in the body. Currently, sepsis is understood as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulatory response of the macroorganism to infection. A special role in this process belongs to the innate and adaptive immune response. Despite the trend towards improving survival rates, mortality in sepsis remains high - about 25%, reaching 60% with the development of septic shock. Extracorporeal therapy, as an adjuvant method of treatment, has been used for more than 30 years, but conducting large randomized studies confirming its effectiveness is associated with a complex of problems, including the extreme heterogeneity of the population of patients with sepsis and septic shock, different etiologies and complex pathogenesis, non-identical pathophysiological pathways of the dominant organ dysfunction in specific time period and degree of its severity. Goal of the study is to evaluate safety and efficiency of combined hemoperfusion and therapeutic plasma exchange in adult patients with septic shock.
The study aims to map the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after intensive care for Sepsis with the hypothesis that it will be lower than that in the general population. The investigators also want to identify factors that are associated with low HRQoL, to see if those are available for interventions from the health care system and society to improve quality of life after treatment for sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU).
The average age of patients with sepsis has increased in recent years in parallel with the incidence of sepsis. Many of these patients are frail and require various medications for the treatment of their chronic diseases. Common treatments, including e.g. sarcopenic drugs (statins, sulphonylureas, methyglinides), antioxidants that prevent sarcopenia (allopurinol) or immunoregulators (corticosteroids) may influence the survival and functional prognosis of these patients. Knowing which drugs influence sepsis survival and to what degree patients who survive sepsis have functional deterioration and increased comorbidity and which modifiable factors limit this may be essential.
This prospective observational cohort study included all septic shock patients with two groups of ESS and anylised in 28-day outcome, clinical biochemical parameters and hemodynamic monitoring.
Objectives: investigators aim to study the effect of addition of vitamin C as a part of treatment in septic shock patients on: Hemodynamics, Inflammation status and ICU outcome. Subjects and methods: A prospective interventional randomized cohort study, was conducted on 150 consecutive patients who were admitted to the ICU with septic shock based on SIRS, SOFA and APACHE II. Treatment group (n=75) had given ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) parenterally 6gm daily and control group (n=75). Measuring the level of Vitamin C in all study population (normal range 50-70 μM/L) before and after period of 4 days.
Intra-abdominal infections are a common cause of sepsis and frequently occur in intensive care unit (ICU) patient. Various markers such as procalcitonin, presepsin and endotoxin are used to identify patients at risk of sepsis or to guide proper treatment. No studies compared presepsin to procalcitonin and endotoxin in patients treated with by extracorporeal hemoperfusion with a polymyxin-B-adsorbing cartridge (PMX-HA).
Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Some researchers proposed that the dysregulated response or organ dysfunction can be lessened by reducing the stress response, which further reduce complication and mortality rates of sepsis. Dexmedetomidine is alpha adrenergic receptor agonist, presenting sympatholytic action in certain parts of the brain with anxiolytic, sedative, and pain killing effects. In the experiments of sepsis animal model, dexmedetomidine have been proved to improve serum lactate clearance and the microcirculation. Dexmedetomidine may inhibit inflammation, as it enhances the activity of the immune system while reducing its systemic reaction and lowering cytokine concentrations. There are also evidences in clinical trials with definite safety that dexmedetomidine reduced inflammation, reduced vasopressor requirements and improved organ function. The beta antagonist esmolol has been proposed as a therapy to lower heart rate, thereby improving diastolic filling time, and improving cardiac output, resulting in a reduction in vasopressor support. A recent meta-analysis of 8 randomized studies using esmolol suggested that the 32% risk ratio decreased 28-day mortality, and a meta-analysis of 7 studies using esmolol in patients with sepsis and septic shock was associated with 32% lower 28-day mortality. However, the effect of anti-stress drugs on cerebral hemodynamics is unknown. In this study, investigators are going to apply the technique of transcranial Doppler to assess the reaction of cerebral blood flow in anti-stress group and control group.
Introduction: Septic shock leads to high morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Several lower-case scientific studies have supported the synergistic positive effect of vitamin C, thiamine, and hydrocortisone on sepsis-induced organ dysfunction. Aim: Our aim was to investigate the effect of vitamin complex on organ failure, laboratory parameters, respiratory and antibiotic treatment, intensive care time, and mortality in septic shock patients. Material and methods: In our retrospective and prospective analysis, we collected parameters from 43 (23 vitamin-treated, 20 control) septic shock patients. Patients treated with vitamin, they received vitamin C (4x1500 mg), thiamine (2x200 mg) for three days (2). In other respects, and for hydrocortisone (200 mg / 24h), both groups of patients received treatment according to the European Sepsis Recommendation. SPSS (V-21) data were used for data collection, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. Ethical license: 7849-PTE 2019.
object name: Lung ultrasound-guided fluid resuscitation in neonatal septic shock. type of study: prospective observational study. goal of study: The effects of severe ultrasound-assisted fluid resuscitation and conventional fluid resuscitation on the prognosis of children with neonatal septic shock were compared to evaluate the application value of the two techniques in fluid resuscitation of neonatal septic shock. research design: In this study, children with neonatal septic shock diagnosed in the neonatal intensive care unit of the Second People 's Hospital of Guangdong Province from January 1,2022 to December 31,2023 were included in the population. According to the different monitoring methods used in conventional / clinical shock treatment, 30 cases of fluid resuscitation assisted by severe ultrasound, 30 cases of fluid resuscitation assisted by NICOM and 30 cases of conventional fluid resuscitation were collected, a total of 90 cases. ( 1 ) The demographic data, blood examination and microbiological examination data of the two groups at admission were collected. ( 2 ) The fluid volume, blood lactic acid, blood pressure, vasoactive drugs ( such as dopamine and epinephrine / norepinephrine ), mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and antibiotic use were collected before fluid resuscitation. ( 3 ) The cumulative fluid infusion volume during fluid resuscitation ( 6 hours ), and the use of vasoactive drugs and mechanical ventilation for 6 hours were collected. ( 4 ) NICU hospitalization time, cumulative hospitalization time and mortality were collected. Data collection : ( 1 ) The demographic data, blood examination and microbiological examination data of the three groups at admission were collected. ( 2 ) The fluid volume, blood lactic acid, blood pressure, vasoactive drugs ( such as dopamine and adrenaline / norepinephrine ), mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and antibiotic use before fluid resuscitation were collected. ( 3 ) The cumulative fluid infusion volume during fluid resuscitation ( 6 hours ), and the use of vasoactive drugs and mechanical ventilation for 6 hours were collected. ( 4 ) NICU hospitalization time, cumulative hospitalization time and mortality were collected.