View clinical trials related to Septic Shock.
Filter by:The norepinephrine and vasopressin for rescue versus early vasopressin for vasopressor dependent sepsis (NoVa) is a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing an early vasopressin initiation strategy versus norepinephrine plus vasopressin initiation only as a rescue strategy for hemodynamic management of critically ill patients with vasopressor dependent sepsis.
The complexity of pediatric septic shock arise from its varied pathophysiology, which includes systemic inflammation, cardiovascular collapse, and multiple organ dysfunction. Current standard treatments, which primarily focusedon fluid resuscitation, had exhibited several problems. Excessive fluid resuscitation has been associated with complications such as fluid overload, which may cause conditions such as pulmonary edema and organ dysfunction, leading to worsened outcomes. This emphasizes the need for alternative therapeutic strategies that can effectively manage hemodynamic instability while minimizing the risks of fluid overload. In adult patients, the early use of vasopressors has been recommended to restore perfusion in patients with septic shock, compared to repeated fluid loading. However, previous research on the use of norepinephrine and the preload status of the pediatric population is still limited. In addition, the use of fluid resuscitation does not always exhibit the desirable response, which is the increase of blood pressure. This is because the blood pressure depends not only on the stroke volume but also the vascular resistance. Consequently, predicting blood pressure elevation after fluid resuscitation remains challenging. Based on previous research, arterial elastance has the potential to predict the increase of blood pressure in response to fluid administration. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effects of early administration of fluid resuscitation combined with norepinephrine in pediatric septic shock patients and evaluate the useof arterial elastance as a predictor of blood pressure response following fluid resuscitation. Finally, this study will also evaluate the parameters such as stroke volume index, cardiac index, lactate clearance , arterial elastance in pediatric patients with septic shock who were resuscitated using the hemodynamic support guidelines according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocols.
Sepsis is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by a dynamic course and a clinical outcome dependent on several factors, and responsible for one in five deaths worldwide. The aim of this trial is to identify new prognostic markers for the progression of sepsis to septic shock, by comparing epigenetic markers between patients who have or have not developed severe forms of sepsis. The main objective of this preliminary study is to identify prognostic markers for the progression of sepsis to septic shock, i.e. to compare targeted markers between subjects with sepsis who progress to septic shock versus subjects with sepsis who do not progress to septic shock.
Sepsis is a critical burden for a healthcare. From 2000 to 2020, the number of publications and clinical studies on the topic of Sepsis and septic shock on the National Library of Medicine resource The National Center for Biotechnology Information has tripled. Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that causes significant pathophysiological changes in the body. Currently, sepsis is understood as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulatory response of the macroorganism to infection. A special role in this process belongs to the innate and adaptive immune response. Despite the trend towards improving survival rates, mortality in sepsis remains high - about 25%, reaching 60% with the development of septic shock. Extracorporeal therapy, as an adjuvant method of treatment, has been used for more than 30 years, but conducting large randomized studies confirming its effectiveness is associated with a complex of problems, including the extreme heterogeneity of the population of patients with sepsis and septic shock, different etiologies and complex pathogenesis, non-identical pathophysiological pathways of the dominant organ dysfunction in specific time period and degree of its severity. Goal of the study is to evaluate safety and efficiency of combined hemoperfusion and therapeutic plasma exchange in adult patients with septic shock.
Fluids are considered the primary treatment for critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), aiming to replace losses and or to enhance venous return, stroke volume, and consequently, cardiac output and tissue oxygen delivery. The modalities, volumes, and targets employed to titrate fluid therapy vary significantly in current clinical practice, as shown by the original FENICE study 10 years ago. FENICE studied how fluid challenges are given at the bedside. Very little is known about how this practice has changed since, how fluid administration (maintenance) is performed in general, and how the modality may impact outcomes. FENICE II is designed to explore these issues. Objectives: To provide a comprehensive global description of fluid administration modalities during the initial days of ICU admission and to explore any association between fluid administration characteristics and clinical outcomes. To describe the fluid challenge administration modality and appraise the use of variables and functional hemodynamic tests to guide bolus infusion.
Sepsis and septic shock are global health problems, leading to a high mortality rate. They are often associated with extremely low blood pressure and multiple organ dysfunctions, which are the main causes of death in critically ill patients. Fluid resuscitation is one of the most critical treatments for patients with sepsis and septic shock. An early administration of an appropriate fluid to patients is considered the most effective way to increase blood pressure, improve tissue perfusion, and save their lives. Crystalloid fluids are a subset of intravenous solutions composed of mineral salts and other small, water-soluble molecules, including normal, isotonic or hypertonic saline, and various buffered solutions.
The study aims to map the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after intensive care for Sepsis with the hypothesis that it will be lower than that in the general population. The investigators also want to identify factors that are associated with low HRQoL, to see if those are available for interventions from the health care system and society to improve quality of life after treatment for sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU).
The purpose of the trial is to test if a strategy of resuscitation guided by capillary refill time and individualised clinical hemodynamic phenotyping can improve important clinical outcomes within 28 days in septic shock patients compared to usual care.
Septic shock is common complication in patients with critical illnesses, with higher incidence in low and medium income countries like ours. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is also common in patients presenting to intensive care units. Further DIC is common coexisting condition seen in many patients presenting with sepsis and septic shock. Both DIC and septic shock individually are associated with very high mortality and morbidity and coexistence of both increase risk manifold. Organ dysfunction is a complication of both septic shock and DIC individually and in presence of coexistence risk further multiply. DIC scoring of every patient at risk as in patients presenting with septic shock help us to predict about patients having more chances to convert to overt DIC. Understanding effects of DIC on organ dysfunction in septic shock patients can help to prognosticate and guide towards early intervention. Also, there is paucity of literature on effect of DIC score changes on organ dysfunction in patients with septic shock.
The average age of patients with sepsis has increased in recent years in parallel with the incidence of sepsis. Many of these patients are frail and require various medications for the treatment of their chronic diseases. Common treatments, including e.g. sarcopenic drugs (statins, sulphonylureas, methyglinides), antioxidants that prevent sarcopenia (allopurinol) or immunoregulators (corticosteroids) may influence the survival and functional prognosis of these patients. Knowing which drugs influence sepsis survival and to what degree patients who survive sepsis have functional deterioration and increased comorbidity and which modifiable factors limit this may be essential.