View clinical trials related to Scoliosis.
Filter by:Adults (18 years and over) and children (10-17 years of age) scheduled for surgery to correct scoliosis will be included in this study, for which participation will last 6 months. Each age group of participants will be randomized to two cohorts: one cohort will receive standard of care, while the other will also have their standard radiographic images used in the construction of a three-dimensional visualization of the spine. Questionnaires administered before and after surgery, in addition to health information collected throughout the course of the study, will indicate whether the three-dimensional model has an effect on the planning, performance, and outcomes of surgery. Participants in this study will not be asked to do anything outside the standard of care. The only manipulated variable in this study is the construction of the three dimensional model, which is made from information collected during the standard of care, and requires no further action on the participant's behalf. The results of this study may show that three-dimensional visualizations can be of value to spinal surgeons, and positively affect patient outcomes.
While studies have shown that better outcomes are associated with brace wear compliance in the scoliosis and clubfoot populations, compliance rates are still poor. Reasons identified by patients, parents and research for not complying with prescribed brace wear include the inconvenience or irritability of the child when in the brace in the case of clubfeet, and fear of looking different from peers, clothes not fitting properly, or discomfort in the case of scoliosis. While reasons for noncompliance are many and can be complex, there has been some research to indicate that personality traits may play a role in brace wear compliance. The primary purpose of the proposed study is to determine if personality traits are related to compliance patterns for individuals undergoing brace treatment for AIS or Clubfeet.
Two recent studies showed that having two attending spine surgeons performing complex adult spine deformity surgery instead of one, decreased complications, unplanned surgeries within 30-days [Ames], 90-day readmissions, wound infection, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis and post-operative neurologic complications [Sethi]. However, both studies were retrospective and did not evaluate any cost-savings associated with having two spine surgeons instead of one performing complex spine deformity surgery. Most cost-effectiveness studies have used traditional accounting (TA) methods to determine costs. A few cost-effectiveness studies have used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) [Kaplan] in medicine [Au, Balakrishnan] and none in spine surgery. Objectives: The objectives of the study are (1) to determine if dual spine attendings reduce downstream costs compared to a single spine attending for complex spine surgeries using traditional accounting methods; and (2) to demonstrate an application of the TDABC method to evaluate the operating room phase during complex adult spinal deformity surgery and compare it to traditional accounting methods (TA).
This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine if using FloTrac/EV1000 system in neurosurgical patients undergoing craniotomies for aneurysm repair or tumor resection complicated by cerebral edema, or complex spinal surgery including multi-level scoliosis correction, is a more effective way of monitoring fluid.
The long-term goal of this study is to optimize the perioperative care of pediatric spinal deformity patients, minimizing perioperative complications and increasing cost-effectiveness of perioperative hematologic management. The objective of the proposed study, which is the initial step in pursuit of this goal, is to evaluate the effectiveness of thromboelastography (TEG) to monitor coagulation pathways and direct blood product replacement in pediatric neuromuscular spinal deformity surgery. The central hypothesis of this study is that TEG will decrease exposure to allogeneic packed red blood cells (PRBC). The rationale is that proven effectiveness of TEG in neuromuscular deformity may change the standard of care for hematologic management in neuromuscular spinal deformity cases and additionally set the stage for a multicenter trial in idiopathic pediatric deformity.
Patient-controlled Intermittent epidural bolus versus epidural infusion for posterior spinal fusion after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis surgery is commonly performed in adolescent due to idiopathic scoliosis. It is reported that the postoperative pain after scoliosis surgery that occurs due to Surgical trauma and severe reflex muscle spasm be severe and excruciating. There are many methods for postoperative pain management. It is used often opioid , paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with patient- controlled intravenous analgesia (IV-PCA). In addition; intrathecal opioids, one catheter epidural with intermittent dosing bolus of morphine or continuous infusion (either opioids or local anaesthetics or both), double epidural catheter with continuous infusion and intravenous ketamine infusion were preferred other postoperative pain management models. Epidural analgesia is accepted procedure with the efficacy and safety profile for postoperative pain management in major orthopedic surgery including scoliosis surgery. Epidural analgesia techniques commonly have been used in continuous infusion of local anesthetics with or without opioid. It was emphasized that there was not adequate data in the literature to provide argument concerning the use of epidural opioids after spinal surgery. The objective of this study was to compare the effects and side effects patient- controlled intermittent bolus epidural analgesia (PCIEA) and patient- controlled continuous epidural analgesia (PCCEA) with morphine for postoperative pain control in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after posterior spinal fusion. Methods The study was conducted after obtaining written consent from all patients and guardian, approval from the Inonu University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee. This prospective randomized controlled double-blinded study was conducted 47 patient between 8-18 years, American Society of Anesthesia Classification (ASA) I-II, with idiopathic scoliosis, scheduled for elective posterior spinal fusion. Patients with a history of allergy to the drugs used in the study protocol, drug abused , preoperative neurologic deficit, inability to use a visual analogue scale, pulmonary, cardiac and neuropsychiatric disorders were excluded. Exclusion criteria during the study were accidental perforation of dura, faulty epidural catheter placement, postoperative neurologic deficit or uncontrollable nausea, vomiting and pruritus. The patients who were not premedicated were instructed on the visual analog scale (VAS) and the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device that was implanted during the postoperative period. Patients were divided into two groups using the envelope drawing method. Patients who received epidural morphine with PCIEA represented Group 1, epidural morphine with PCCEA represented Group 2. The anesthetist who collected data and the patients were blinded. All operations were performed by the same surgical team. The posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws was applied to thoracic and lumbar spine. Epidural catheter was inserted by surgeon under direct visualization at the midpoint of the incision and advanced 5-6 cm cephalad to thoracic 4-5 before surgical closure. Intubated patients was taken to in the reanimation intensive care unit after operation, IV acetaminophen 15 mg / kg was started before extubation and repeated every 6 hours. After extubation and a neurological examination, patients in the PCİEA group received morphine 50 µg/kg in 10 mL bolus, lockout time 1 hour, no infusion. In Group 2, PCECA infusion the following initial setting loading morphine 0.02mg/kg in 8mL, was maintained 0.01 mg/kg continuous infusion 4mL, 0.05 mg/kg 2mL bolus dose. 30 minute lock-out interval. 4 hour limit was 4 mg/kg. Pain score, morphine usage, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, rate their satisfaction ,sedation scores and motor block were assessed by researchers who were blinded to the study groups at postoperatively 2., 4., 6., 8., 12., 18., ve 24.hour, in all patients.
The primary objective of this prospective, post-market study is to collect data to assess the long term outcome of a broad contact modular interbody device in the form of the InterFuse S™ or InterFuse T™ device in patients undergoing long construct fusion for degenerative disc disease and/or scoliosis. Comparisons will be made with published historical data..
The purpose of this single-arm observational study is to observe and document clinical outcomes of the OLIF25™ and OLIF51™ procedures in patients diagnosed with degenerative disc disease or degenerative scoliosis, and report the rate of adverse events of interest through the 24 months follow-up visit.
This study hypothesizes that the addition of a low-dose ketamine infusion to usual post-operative pain management will improve pain control as evidenced by an improvement in post-operative pain scores for patients undergoing spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.
Aim of the study is to evaluate a new brace that has become available, the Peak Scoliosis Brace (Aspen Medical Products) designed to alleviate pain for adult patients with chronic pain secondary to scoliosis. 20 adults with back pain secondary to Idiopathic Scoliosis will be recruited. The sample size was calculated considering the data collected during the development of the brace in the US. Patients will be evaluated at baseline immediately before starting with the brace and after 4 weeks and 6 months. The brace must be worn for at least 2-4 hours per day. At each evaluation they will be asked to fill the questionnaires, to be used as outcome measure of the results.