View clinical trials related to Schizophrenia.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a visual remediation intervention for people with schizophrenia. The intervention targets two visual functions that much research has shown are impaired in many people with the disorder, namely contrast sensitivity and perceptual organization. The first phase of the study will test the effects of interventions targeting each of these processes, as well as the effects of a combined package. A control condition of higher-level cognitive remediation is included as a fourth condition. The second phase of the study will evaluate the effectiveness of the most effective intervention from the first phase, but in a new and larger sample of individuals. Outcome measures include multiple aspects of visual functioning, as well as visual cognition and overall community functioning.
Risperidone is a selective monoamine receptor antagonist. It plays an antipsychotic effect by antagonizing 5-HT2 / D2 receptor. As a second-generation antipsychotic drug, risperidone is metabolized to 9-hydroxy Risperidone in the body very quickly. There are individual differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of risperidone. For example, CYP2D6 genotype can greatly affect the metabolism of risperidone, and provide evidence for adjusting the type and dose of medication to treat Schizophrenia. In this study, we will verify the correlation between the polymorphisms of genes related with risperidone drug metabolites, drug transporters, drug targets and drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics, adverse reactions in Chinese population, providing basis for clinical rational use of risperidone.
Schizophrenia is a chronic and severe mental disorder with a lifetime prevalence of about 1 per cent, the symptoms can be very disabling and causing a heavy medical and socioeconomic. There are significant variations from one population to another. Clinical manifestations of schizophrenia (symptoms, evolution, severity of disability) are highly variable. This variability, both epidemiological and clinical, is due to genetic and environmental factors. Environmental factors may be either risk factors or modifying factors (changing clinical presentation but do not alter the risk of disease) for schizophrenia. Environmental risk factors have been identified (eg: urbanity, cannabis, migration), but the investigators don't know neither the components directly responsible, nor the mechanisms by which they increase the risk of schizophrenia. To date, there is no study has systematically evaluated the role of environmental modifying factors in schizophrenia. Environmental factors may be individual, unique to each person (eg cannabis, migration.), or population-based (eg ethnic density, socio-economic difficulties.) The identification/ identifying of environmental risk factors or modifiers, both individual and population, may have theoretical implications (understanding of etiopathogenic mechanisms) and practical (implementation of preventive measures). The potential effectiveness of preventive measures is even greater than the risk attributable to certain environmental factors is important. Most studies on environmental factors in schizophrenia were conducted in Anglo-Saxon countries and northern Europe, but no study of these risk factors has been conducted in France. There are important differences environment based on study populations, these results are not generalizable to other countries, including France.
In this study, the investigators will investigate the impact and the related mechanism of metformin treatment on cognitive impairment of schizophrenia with a high risk of metabolic syndrome. Patients will be randomized to the metformin group or non-metformin control group (40 patients per arm) for 24 weeks. Clinical assessment will be done at screen/baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. The specific aims are to compare the metformin group versus controls on 1) clinical core symptoms; 2) cognition. Biological samples also will be collected, and stored to research related mechanisms.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and social skills training (SST) are recommended psychological interventions to improve symptomatology and functional recovery in psychosis. In addition, CBT may reduce hyperactivation of the brain structures responsible for the stress response. In patients with early onset psychotic disorder (EOP) there are not any previous controlled study that has analyzed the efficacy of this type of intervention. The aim of this study is to investigate efficacy of CBT + SST in symptomatic and functional improvement after the treatment in patients with EOP. The study will also examine the potential effect of the intervention on neurobiological stress markers.
A burgeoning body of research has pointed to increased efficacy of clozapine (CLZ) over other antipsychotics in schizophrenia (SCZ). On the other hand, safety concerns likely cause underutilization across a range of European and other nations. The lack of data available to predict efficacy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of CLZ further contributes to underprescription rates in these countries. Here, we hypothesize that (epi)genetic and non-genetic factors aid to help predict treatment outcome (efficacy + ADRs) to CLZ. We furthermore posit that such prediction will result in enhanced quality of life of both patients and family members. Our primary objective is to predict CLZ treatment outcome based on phenotypic and genetic data obtained through the current design. The first secondary objective is to investigate which methylation levels/patterns are correlated with CLZ treatment outcome. The second secondary objective is to aid in the further elucidation of the genetic architecture of SCZ and any possible differences between 'regular' SCZ patients and those on CLZ, who are generally more severely ill. We thus intend to cover two currently unmet needs using a precision medicine approach: the lack of knowledge about determinants of treatment response to CLZ and the lack of insight into neurobiological differences between 'regular' SCZ and relatively treatment resistant subjects (CLZ users). The prime analysis will be a common variant hypothesis-generating genotyping endeavor investigating treatment response to CLZ. Additional analyses include whole-genome methylation and gene expression analyses and analyses of non-genetic determinants of response. We will include 2,500 CLZ treated patients for our discovery cohort, which is in line with previous whole-genome pharmacogenomics studies and our power calculations. We will replicate any genome-wide loci using our prospectively collected cohort of new users (N=59). Potential yields include a publicly available prediction tool to help identify patients responsive to CLZ in early disease stages and prevent harmful effects. In addition, common variant analyses compounded by pathway analyses may help elucidate the mechanisms of action of CLZ. We ask for broad informed consent from participants ensuring rich, longitudinal phenotypic and genotypic data resources for both currently planned and future analyses, allowing e.g. next-generation sequencing focused on both CLZ and SCZ disease genetics (e.g. in large consortia). We plan to also generate polygenic risk scores (PRS) of CLZ efficacy and use those to identify other diseases or patients for which CLZ may be helpful, e.g. schizoaffective disorder patients who are sometimes first treated with mood stabilizers. Last, evidence hints that disparaging genetic loci influence efficacy to different antipsychotics. Adding genetic data from our cohort to existing datasets of response to other antipsychotics may help identify such loci. Finally, comparison studies with non-CLZ using patients suffering from SCZ may deepen the understanding of biological mechanisms underlying treatment resistance (or: a relatively severe course of illness).The results of this genetic part of the study will be combined with the results from our other research protocol 'Phenomics and genomic of clozapine pharmacotherapy - New Users'.The overarching goal of both projects is to create a prediction model for clozapine outcome (response (and side effects). This model includes genetic, epigenetic and clinical data.
This randomized clinical trial compares the influence of joint crisis plans (JCP) or crisis cards to reduce psychiatric coercion for people with severe and often recurring mental illnesses like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder. Both interventions will be carried out as an integrated part of otherwise standard psychiatric in-patient and out-patient care in psychiatric units specializing in the acute or non-acute treatment of mentioned mental illnesses.
This multi-centre study will evaluate the clinical efficacy of 3 atypical antipsychotics treatment in Chinese Patients with Schizophrenia by comparing model-decision with real-world psychiatrist-decision. The three atypical antipsychotics are olanzapine (5-20 milligram per day), risperidone (2-6 milligram per day) and aripiprazole (5-30 milligram per day). The main purpose of this study is to explore the potential difference between modal-aided-decision with clinician-decision in order to validate and optimize the selection model that has been established in advance. The efficacy evaluations include symptoms, social function, recurrence rate and hospitalization. Visits occurs at 0, 4, 8, 13, 26, 52 weeks.
Patients with schizophrenia show enhanced dopamine synthesis capacity and release, an effect that can be evoked in healthy subjects by repeated amphetamine administration. Therefore for the first time the relationship between dopamine synthesis and release will be studied in healthy subjects before and after amphetamine sensitization in order to better understand adaptive mechanisms of the dopamine system.
The purpose of this study is to examine whether cerebellar stimulation can be used to improve cognitive deficits and mood in patients with schizophrenia, autism, bipolar disorder, Parkinson's disease, and major depression.