View clinical trials related to SARS-CoV-2.
Filter by:Study objective is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of masitinib and isoquercetin in adult hospitalized patients with moderate and severe COVID-19.
The primary goal for this study is to assess whether receiving the results of an antibody test changes protective behavior to avoid SARS-CoV-2 infections (i.e., mask-wearing, physical distancing, limiting close contacts/avoiding crowds, hand-washing, avoiding contact with high-risk individuals). While studies have been published on the cross-sectional relationship between risk perception and other demographic characteristics and health behaviors that are protective for SARS-CoV-2 infection (see citations), there have been no studies showing the effect of receiving information about antibody positivity on protective behavior. Not only can results from this study be used to better model transmission, a better understanding of college student's risk perception around SARS-CoV-2 infections has implications for future vaccination strategies as well. There are concerns that a desire to return to "normal" life in combination with reduced perception of risk could have negative consequences for uptake of vaccination (Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security 2020 report, The Public's Role in COVID-19 Vaccination: Planning Recommendations Informed by Design Thinking and the Social, Behavioral, and Communication Sciences). The antibody test used in this study is named 'SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG rapid assay kit (Colloidal Gold)'. It provides a fast, on-site, and accurate detection of IgM/IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, with positive results of IgM antibodies indicating a recent infection, while positive results of IgG antibodies signaling a longer or previous infection. It can detect IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in human specimens of serum, plasma, or venous whole blood.
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate (at the time of admission) biomarkers of interest (Human Plasma BAK125 panel + interferon panel) for dexamethasone responders versus non-responders in SARS-CoV-2 hypoxemic pneumonia. The secondary objectives are to describe and compare between groups: - The number of days without mechanical ventilation - The need for mechanical ventilation - 28-day mortality - Progression towards acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) - Change in the qSOFA score - Length of hospitalization - The change in the extent of lesions on thoracic computed tomography scan between inclusion and D7 (or the day of discharge from hospital if <D7) - Change in biomarkers on D0, D2, D4, D7 (NFS, liver tests (ASAT, ALAT), Creatinine, Albumin, CRP, D-dimers, Ferritin, LDH, lymphocyte phenotyping) - Demonstrate other biomarkers of interest from the usual management (NFS, liver function tests (ASAT, ALAT), Creatinine, Albumin, CRP, D-dimers, Ferritin, LDH, lymphocyte phenotyping) - Change in biomarkers evaluated by mass spectrometry (on a blood sample) on D0 and D7 +/- 2 days - The initial viral load (within 48 hours preceding D0) and at D7 of inclusion estimated from the nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR - Initial SARS-CoV-2 serology and on D7 from inclusion - The A38G polymorphism of the gene coding for Club Cell Secretory Protein (CCSP) for each patient - Short-term complications related to corticosteroid therapy - The quantitative and qualitative impact of corticosteroid therapy on lymphocytes from patients with COVID-19.
The main objectives of this study are 1. to establish the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in schools and kindergartens in the State of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in autumn and winter 2020/2021 2. to monitor the future spread of the disease by assessing serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 in teachers and childcare educators over time
Within the epidemic context of phase 3 in Mexico, the implementation of new treatments that have been shown to be beneficial for patients in other countries is an urgent need. Methylene blue (MB, the oxidized form, blue color) has been used in many different clinical medicine areas, ranging from malaria to orthopedics. Methylene blue absorbs energy directly from a light source and then transfers this energy to molecules of oxygen creating singlet oxygen (O2), which is the first electronic excited state of molecular oxygen (O2). Singlet oxygen is extremely electrophilic; thus, it can directly oxidize electron-rich double bonds in biological molecules and macromolecules. For this reason, methylene blue has been used as a photosensitizer in the treatment of cancer and the protection of serum from viral agents. Methylene blue can be reactivated using energy from a light source in the body until processed out through the kidneys.
The study proposes to test photodisinfection (PDF) on SARS-CoV-2 in the nose. The study will use Health Canada approved Steriwave™ Nasal Decolonization (ND) in he nostril of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Participants are swabbed for SARS-CoV-2 before and after the PDF treatment. For the study, a small group of healthcare workers who have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 will be included. They will not undergo the treatment but will need to swab their noses multiple times over the next 5 days. This nil group will provide the effect (if any) of swabbing SARS-CoV-2 levels in the nose.
Based on studies in China, Iceland, the Netherlands and Italy it seems that children are less affected by SARS-CoV-2 infections and play a lesser role in the dissemination of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is unclear to which extend this is due to lesser exposure or an inherent decreased susceptibility to become infected. The low reported number of cases in children can be partially explained by the lower testing rates in the pediatric population. To get insight in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus in school-aged children it is necessary to compile data on infection of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the child and (pre-)adolescent population. The main objective of this study is to determine the sero-prevalence and sero-conversion of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in a sample of school-aged children (primary and secondary school) in Belgium at different time points. Additionally this study will gain insight in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2, the proportion of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 and the role of COVID-19 infection in household members. It will give us the possibility to investigate potential risk factors for infection. The study population includes primary and secondary school children from two predefined age groups (8-9 and 13-14 years old). These two groups are chosen because studies have shown more pronounced symptoms of infection and disease depending on age and because transmission dynamics also vary by age. The study population will be recruited in all Belgian schools including Brussels-Capital, Flemish and Walloon Region (including the German speaking community). The study is a prospective cohort study. In total there will be 3 testing points with 3 months between each point. The sample size calculation indicated the inclusion of 41 randomly selected primary and 41 secondary schools and in each school 20 randomly selected pupils of the defined age groups. Parents/legal child caregiver will complete a questionnaire at each of the testing points providing basic socio-demographic characteristics (at baseline only) and risk-behavior and health characteristics including presence of symptoms during the time since the previous testing point (at each of the testing points). The questionnaire will be completed through a secured online application during the same week as the child had the saliva sample for serological testing taken. Saliva samples will be sent to the Sciensano laboratory for serological analysis. The child's parent/legal caregiver will be informed of the serological result. Study data will guide the Belgian policy makers in their advices to limit circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in Belgium and more specifically in their advice on measures for school-age children. This data might also be used to guide health authorities that have to decide on vaccination strategies once a vaccine is available; to decide whether children should be included for vaccination to create herd immunity or not.
Recent literature shows that the sensitivity of the PCR tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using saliva samples is close to that using nasopharyngeal swabs. This type of sampling represents a practical advantage since it can be performed by the patient herself/himself and would thus allow to speed up the collection process. It is also less painful and could prevent the rare lesions to the nasal mucosa that can occur when using nasopharyngeal swabs. Rapid Diagnostic Tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigens have been developed using nasophayngeal swabs and have shown very high sensitivity against PCR, ranging from 93% to 98% when based on laboratory validation, 80% when based on clinical validation.This method offers the considerable advantage to inform the patient of the test result on site, and allow the provision of appropriate recommendations on the spot of testing. The studies performed so far have been conducted using nasopharyngeal samples only. There are no data with saliva yet. It is expected that the RDT would also work on the saliva. Even if slightly less sensitive due to the fact that it detects antigens and not multiplied RNA as PCR does, RDT on saliva could better serve the public health goal to test widely and quickly and have ultimately more COVID cases detected and isolated, and hence reduced transmission. To investigate the case detection rates of both PCR on saliva and nasopharynx and RDT on nasopharynx and saliva, the patient will be taken four samples, two swabs on saliva, one for RDT and one for PCR, and two swabs on nasopharynx, one for RDT and one for PCR. Patients who have at least one of the common symptoms and who consent to such a procedure will be recruited to compare the four results. The primary objective is to compare the case detection rates for SARS-CoV-2 of the four testing methods (two sampling types and two test types).
COVID-19 is a viral respiratory and systemic disease that has been rapidly spreading globally since the first cases were reported in December 2019 and has now become pandemic. The causative agent of COVID-19 was identified as a novel coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, first designated as 2019-nCoV). The disease manifestations of COVID-19 can range from mild, self-resolving respiratory disease to severe pneumonia, ARDS, multiorgan failure, and ultimately death. In early reports, the mortality rate among patients admitted to hospital and with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported to be between 4 and 15%. Although the disease can afflict all age groups, elderly patients and patients with underlying comorbidities such as high body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or cerebrovascular disease are at risk of developing severe disease and dying. There are currently no etiologic treatments for COVID-19, and efforts are underway to identify therapeutics that could be effective in controlling this disease.
According to different projections, the COVID-19 outbreak currently happening in France and worldwide could result in millions of deaths in the absence of efficient therapies. The COVID-19 causative agent, the SARS-CoV-2, is a virus leading to respiratory system infections in human and for which there is currently no vaccine or treatment scientifically validated in clinical studies. In that context, therapeutic human neutralizing antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 envelop glycoproteins and which enable inhibition of the viral replication represent an innovative therapeutic alternative with great potential. These antibodies are also critical tools for vaccine development. Simultaneously, CHUGA researchers coordinate with each other to set up a collective biological collection to achieve others objectives such as biomarkers identifications.