View clinical trials related to Rupture.
Filter by:The purpose of the DIVERT study is to provide a prudent, controlled clinical context for the use of flow diversion, a promising option of yet unproven benefit, in the care of patients with acute blood blister-like and dissecting intradural aneurysms. Hence DIVERT is a simple, multicenter, randomized trial integrated into daily practice. DIVERT addresses the clinical dilemma of whether the use of PED FD truly is a safe and effective alternative to best standard treatment, defined as conventional methods of treatment or in some cases, observation. Selection criteria are few, to facilitate the recruitment of most affected patients confronted with these difficult aneurysms that their physician judges suitable for PED FD. The trial does not obstruct clinical care, does not include extra tests or risks beyond what is necessary and proven beneficial. Endpoints are simple, clinical, meaningful, valuable and resistant to bias. Follow-up visits and tests are "routine', imposing no extra burden on clinical transactions. Data is collected in simple case-report forms filled by physicians.
Dysphagia is a common reason for referal to the investigators Gastoenterology service. As many as 14% of patients undergoing radiological studies for dysphagia are found to have schatzki rings. Current recommendations for treatment of patients with symptomatic Schatzki rings are based on ancedotal experience and uncontrolled studies. The only randomized study on comparison of techniques the investigators were able to locate was published in 2000 and included only 26 patients. This study demonstrated that the biopsy techinque was as effective as and better tolerated than the standard dilation technique. Considering that the cost and time required for dilatation is greater than the basic biopsy technique, significant cost savings could be achieved using the biopsy technique. As well, patient satisfaction is an important factor considering that Schatzki rings can recur and repeated endoscopy is often required. Therefore, a study that shows a technique to be as or better than the current standard in effectiveness, cost, time, and patient comfort could lead to shift in current practice.
Early preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) complicates 0.7% of pregnancies. When PPROM occurs before the 24th week,the risk of fetal and neonatal death is 70%. There is also a high risk of neonatal and maternal morbidity. When the diagnosis of PPROM is uncertain by physical examination, additional tests are needed. These tests have false positive and false negative rates. The gold standard for diagnosing PPROM is amniocentesis and dye test. This procedure has a risk of infection and abortion.Our hypothesis is that by using a cervical cap for 6 hours and repeated ultrasound exams we can diagnose or rule out PPROM in cases which are uncertain. Our study group will be pregnant women gestational age 14-23, suspected of having PPROM.
Study to compare the quality of life after reconstruction of the cruciate ligament in hospitalized versus day-clinic patient