View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic.
Filter by:This study is in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis(SAR)and will compare the effect versus placebo of repeat doses of intranasal GSK256066 using the Vienna Challenge Chamber. GSK256066 is a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, currently in development by GSK for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, asthma and COPD. Subjects will be selected on the basis that they display a defined moderate response to the pre-determined dose used. Opportunity to assess the efficacy of compounds versus placebo at maximal and trough plasma concentrations. This study aims to explore the actions of repeat doses of intranasal GSK256066 in patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in the Vienna Challenge Chamber compared to placebo. 12-lead ECG, vital signs and adverse event enquiries will be made throughout the study. Nasal examination, symptom scores (TNSS), nasal lavage, nasal scrape and allergen challenge assessments will also be performed at various time points throughout the study.
The purpose of this study is to look at measures that will help scientists understand the way Omalizumab, an FDA-approved anti-allergy medication, works.
This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of an investigational nasal spray compared with placebo nasal spray and commonly used drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disorder of the upper airway that occurs following allergen exposure. The focus of this study, seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), is one type of allergic rhinitis that is triggered by the pollen from trees, grasses, and weeds. Typical symptoms are sneezing, nasal congestion and pruritus, rhinorrhea, and pruritic, watery, red eyes.
The hypothesis to be proven is that histamine iontophoresis with measurement of microvascular blood flow by laser Doppler flowmetry can be used as a reliable marker to characterize the normal microvascular cutaneous response to histamine.
This is a Phase 4 randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center, double-blind study to evaluate the effects of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in subjects with Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) associated with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) using Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), Embletta device home-monitored cardiopulmonary evaluations, and rhinitis evaluations and questionnaires. Approximately 30 subjects 18 to 60 years of age with symptomatic PAR (with or without SAR) will be selected and randomized at one study site. The anticipated duration of subject participation in the study is approximately 39 days. Subjects who qualify at the Screening Visit will complete a 10-14 day run-in/screening period. Following the run-in period, subjects who meet the qualifications at the Baseline Visit will be treated with study medication for 4 weeks.
This study will hope to show that by relieving the participant's nasal symptoms of seasonal allergies using mometasone furoate nasal spray, the participant will obtain a better quality of night-time sleep, which in turn, causes less daytime sleepiness so that he/she can function productively during the day.
This study was designed to assess safety of an investigational nasal spray in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Perennial allergic rhinitis is triggered by house dust, mite and mold etc. Typical symptoms are sneezing, nasal congestion and pruritus and rhinorrhea.
The Protocol section needs to be updated using the following text "The main goal of the study was to validate the Preference Module of the EARNS-Q and to test the reliability using Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicines (TSQM), a validated questionnaire for determining satisfaction among different treatment. The EARNS-Q is divided into 2 modules, an Experience Module and a Preference Module. The Experience Module includes 28 items, fourteen attribute rating items followed by fourteen importance weighing questions. The Preference Module includes the same items along with preference questions related to each item as well as a global preference question.
Various chemical modifications of allergens have been attempted to enhance efficacy, improve safety, and foster compliance with IT. These approaches have been unsuccessful - in that the allergenicity and immunogenicity have either decreased, or increased in tandem, with no resultant efficacy: safety benefit ratio. This study utilizes an adjuvant approach in which synthetic immunostimulatory DNA is conjugated to ragweed allergen in an attempt to modulate both the clinical and immunologic allergic response to ragweed exposure in ragweed-allergic patients with seasonal rhinitis.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, double-dummy, double-blind study with a screening period. Subjects will receive one of the following three treatment groups for 15 days: loratadine 10 mg/montelukast 10 mg combination, pseudoephedrine 240 mg, or placebo. The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of the combination of loratadine/montelukast, a once-daily tablet containing 10 mg loratadine and 10 mg montelukast, compared with placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in relieving the symptom of nasal congestion. The safety profile of combined loratadine/montelukast relative to placebo and pseudoephedrine will also be evaluated.