View clinical trials related to Respiratory Insufficiency.
Filter by:This research will study whether noninvasive ventilation (NIV) used to treat chronic respiratory insufficiency in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) can be initiated as successfully in the outpatient setting as in the conventional inpatient setting, and what the costs of these alternative initiation methods are.
Acute respiratory failure represents a frequent cause of admission to intensive care units (ICUs). In the absence of tailored interventions, it poses an imminent threat to patients' lives. Most patients admitted in ICU undergo fluid expansion to enhance oxygen delivery and preserve cellular function. This practice is grounded in the concept of " preload responsiveness ". However, the accrual of positive fluid balance resulting from fluid administration is now acknowledged as an autonomous risk factor for mortality. Consequently, preload unresponsiveness assumes a pathological character, potentially indicative of fluid overload or right ventricular dysfunction, both deleterious conditions linked to unfavorable outcomes. Maintaining patients in a preload-responsive state may be interesting to limit fluid expansion and the need of invasive mechanical ventilation. The objective of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of preload responsiveness in patients admitted to the ICU with hypoxemic, non-hypercapnic respiratory failure. - Main objective: To evaluate the association between fluid responsiveness, assessed by the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (cIVC) with trans-thoracic echocardiography within the initial 48 hours post-ICU admission, and mortality or the need for invasive mechanical ventilation by day 28 in patients admitted to the ICU for hypoxemic, non-hypercapnic acute respiratory failure. - Secondary objectives: To evaluate the association between fluid responsiveness and mortality at day 28 and day 90, the need of invasive mechanical ventilation, and the number of days free from organ support (vasopressors, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy) by day 28. Upon receipt of both oral and written information, patients will provide non-objection to participate in the study. This prospective single-center study has obtained approval from the Regional Ethics Committee of Ile de France III approval (No. 2022-A02813-40).
Even though nutrition is a fundamental component of Intensive care unit (ICU) therapy, critically ill patients are frequently malnourished, a factor well known for its strong association with a higher risk of complications, prolonged ICU/hospital length of stay, and greater ICU readmission and mortality rates. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use has increased considerably over the past twenty years, making this supportive technique a keystone of acute respiratory failure (ARF) treatment. In this setting, respiratory support is provided through an interface, usually a mask or a helmet, that frequently represents an important obstacle to nutrition delivery, making oral intake impossible and posing the necessity to start enteral (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN). Moreover, while critical care guidelines regarding nutritional management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) are well established, data and recommendations about the appropriate nutritional support to patients in NIV are still very limited. Due to this limited data, we want to describe characteristics and nutritional management of patients undergoing NIV in ICU, and to evaluate the difference between the mean caloric and protein intake of these patients and the recommended caloric and protein target for critically ill patients. Secondarily, we want to evaluate the difference of the caloric and protein intake among groups of patients undergoing different nutritional modality and to assess potential associations of the nutritional characteristics with patient outcomes.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether SBCT is a useful tool for diagnosing the main form of failure respiratory acute and to define the SBCT limit associated with insufficiency respiratory in this population, the requirement for NIV or invasive ventilation. Furthermore, the correlation with the most common scores and indices used in the emergency room will be studied, such as: HACOR, MEW, REMS SCORE, ROS, CURB-65, qSOFA, SEVERITY INDEX OF PNEUMONIA, GWTG HF, LUNG ULTRASOUND SCORE, SINGLE BREATH COUNT
Hypothesis Treatment with HFNC and OptiflowTM+Duet can significantly reduce PaCO2 and normalize pH in patients with COPD exacerbation and acute hypercapnic failure, compared to HFNC with OptiflowTM. Treatment with High flow and OptiflowTM+Duet in patients with COPD exacerbation and acute hypercapnic failure is well tolerated. Aims To investigate the effect of HFNC in combination with either OptiflowTM or OptiflowTM+Duet nasal cannula on PaCO2 levels and pH in patients with COPD exacerbation and acute hypercapnic failure and compare the results of treatment with the two different nasal cannulas. To describe adherence to treatment with high flow and either OptiflowTM or OptiflowTM+Duet nasal cannula. Methods Study design The study will be carried out as a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. - Patients COPD and acute hypercapnic who do not tolerate NIV-treatment will be treated with HFNC for respiratory support. Patients will be randomized to either OptiflowTM /OptiflowTM+Duet nasal cannulas ("Fisher & Paykel Healthcare", Auckland, New Zealand) - HFNC treatment with allocated nasal cannula, flow 40-60 (prescribed by the responsible clinician) will be initiated, titration of FiO2 till target SO2 is reached (as prescribed by the responsible clinician or by default 88-92%). Maximal flow and target saturation should be reached within 1.5 hours of initiation. - Arterial puncture (registering pH, PaO2, PaCO2, HCO3, SaO2 and Base Excess) will be drawn at baseline and repeated after two hours (±30 minutes and after flow and FiO2 have been stable for 30 minutes) and at termination of the HFNC. - Patients will remain in study till it is decided by the treating physician to terminate HFNC-treatment. Patients who are candidates for invasive ventilations will be excluded from the study if the arterial blood gasses further deteriorate after initiation of HFNC.
The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of the I COUGH care program following major abdominal surgery dyspnea, oxygen saturation, pulmonary function, mobility, and pain after major abdominal surgery (MAS), participants were subjected to the "I COUGH" care program designed to support their health condition and reduce complications. The study aimed to investigate a simple and inexpensive pulmonary care program that can be easily understood and remembered by patients, their families, and medical staff. Ho: The I COUGH care program after MAS does not improves pulmonary functions, oxygen saturation, mobility and decrease dyspnea and pain after MAS. H1: The I COUGH care program improves pulmonary functions, oxygen saturation mobility and decrease dyspnea and pain after MAS.
Sedation remains a ubiquitous and crucial component of intensive care treatments in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Sedation relieves anxiety, reduces distress, and promotes tolerance of endotracheal intubation and associated life-sustaining interventions such as mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular assistance, and renal support. Thus, choosing the optimal sedative agent is vital to patient comfort, safety, and survival. Despite more than 20 years of intensive care sedation research, there is still no consensus on what constitutes best sedation practice. The Society of Critical Care Medicine, the premier critical care organisation in North America, published the 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility and Sleep (PADIS) disruption (chaired by our primary applicant W.A.) and issued weak recommendations to provide analgesia before sedation, to target light sedation whenever clinically feasible, and to use either dexmedetomidine or propofol over midazolam for the sedation of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Similarly, the American Thoracic Society produced a set of Clinical Practice Guidelines to promote liberation and weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients, with weak recommendations for the use of non-benzodiazepines as primary sedatives and to target light sedation when clinically possible. A weak recommendation was issued in an Intensive Care Medicine Rapid Practice Guideline published in 2022 to use dexmedetomidine over propofol for sedation of critically ill adults, if the desired outcome is a reduction in delirium. These guidelines, however, do not consider age-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, illness severity, timing of sedative administration, operative vs medical reason for admission, or the changing dynamics of sedation practice at different phases of critical illness. The lack of high-level evidence to inform sedation practice in the critically ill has led to approaches that are mainly opinion-based and lack the support of evidence from large multicentre, international randomised clinical trials.
The additional time required to awaken a patient is one of the main reasons for not extubating him or her in the operating room (OR). Conversely, transferring an intubated patient to recovery room (RR), prolonging the duration of anesthesia and intubation, in a limited environment in human resources, may lead to increased complications' rates. Little is known about those time lengths and complications rates.
The goal of this randomised controlled, cross-over clinical trial is to compare High Flow Nasal Cannulas (HFNC) and Continuous Positive Airways Pressure (CPAP) in neonates over 34 weeks' amenorrhoea (SA) up to children weighing less than 20 kg with respiratory failure. The main question it aims to answer is the non-inferiority of high flows of high-flow nasal cannula compared with CPAP by analysis of diaphragmatic contraction (EAdi (Electrical activity of diaphragm)). Participants with respiratory failure and need of non invasive ventilation and nasogastric tube will receive 4 different increasing flows of HFNC and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure of 7 cmH2O with CPAP during 30 minutes for each flow rate and CPAP. The electrical activity of diaphragm and clinical data of the patient upon each flow and support will be collected. According to the cross-over procedure, the patients will change groups (increasing flows of HFNC or CPAP) in order to perform the remaining analysis.
This is a registry-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of the effect of added high-flow oxygen therapy (using the device Lumis HFT) during one year in people with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or interstitial lung disease (ILD).