Clinical Trials Logo

Respiratory Insufficiency clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Respiratory Insufficiency.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05309239 Recruiting - Rox Index Clinical Trials

ROX Index in Acute Respiratory Failure

Start date: March 21, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

evaluation of ROX index among ICU patients to evaluate the success of non invasive ventilation or the need for intubation

NCT ID: NCT05308719 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery

NOTACS
Start date: September 8, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

NOTACS aims to determine if prophylactic use of high-flow nasal therapy (for a minimum of 16 hours after tracheal extubation, inclusive of up to one hour off randomised therapy for transfers around the hospital and/or physio mobilisation) increases days at home in the first 90 days after surgery, for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery who are at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. The study also incorporates a health economic analysis to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of HFNT versus standard oxygen therapy at 90 days, from the view-point of the public sector, NHS and patients.

NCT ID: NCT05297487 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Evaluation of the Early Use of the Pressure Relaxer in the Respiratory Impairment of Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study.

RELAX SLA
Start date: July 1, 2025
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare and serious neurodegenerative disease causing degeneration of motor neurons. . It leads to a progressive paralysis of the muscles involved in voluntary motricity. In France, its incidence is 2.5/100,000 inhabitants per year. The death of patients is mainly caused by a progressive attack of the respiratory muscles. Indeed, the thorax is no longer actively mobilized to the maximum amplitude, it will lose its flexibility. A restrictive syndrome sets in followed by alveolar hypoventilation. Bronchial congestion may be concomitant. Management is then based on non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This step, which is difficult for patients to accept psychologically, must be delayed as much as possible. However, to date, there are no precise recommendations on preventing the appearance of this restrictive syndrome and on slowing down the deterioration of lung function in patients. The pressure relaxer (RLX) is an instrumental aid allowing on the one hand to mobilize the thorax thanks to hyper insufflations, and on the other hand to increase the effectiveness of the cough. The use of this device in physiotherapy is part of the HAS recommendations to promote decluttering. However, we believe that RLX in patients with ALS, through the pulmonary alveolar recruitment it induces, could be relevant at an earlier phase, for the prevention of the decline in pulmonary functions: the restrictive syndrome, bronchial congestion and alveolar hypoventilation. So ultimately, the quality of life and survival of these patients would be improved. It is in this context that this multicenter randomized controlled study RELAX'SLA takes place in order to evaluate the effects of the early use of the pressure relaxer on the respiratory impairment of patients with ALS.

NCT ID: NCT05289960 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Failure

Lung Ultrasound Score and Weaning Outcome

Start date: December 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Objectives: Failure of extubation of patients on mechanical ventilation is one of the common problems in the ICU. Aim of work: To evaluate the validity of lung ultrasound score in prediction of weaning outcomes and post-extubation distress.

NCT ID: NCT05288218 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Respiratory Insufficiency

Evaluation of Leak-free Bronchoscope Adapter

Start date: May 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Patients who develop respiratory failure require the assistance of mechanical ventilation while recovering from their respiratory injury. For example, patients that are affected by COVID-19 can develop such severe respiratory failure that they are unable to breathe on their own and therefore require the assistance of a mechanical ventilator. A Bronchoscope is a tool that can be used to visualize the inside of the lungs to aid in further diagnosis and delivery of therapeutic agents in patients with respiratory disease or failure. However, bronchoscopy can cause air to leak from the patient's lungs into the room due to a poorly designed adapter that is required to facilitate the introduction of the bronchoscope into the lungs. This leak can lead to the patient losing oxygen during the procedure which can be harmful to the patient and delay or limit recovery. Additionally, the air that leaks can lead to the spread of bacteria/viruses into the ambient air, which can contaminate the intensive care unit and expose other patients and healthcare workers to harmful pathogens. This was highlighted most recently during the COVID-19 pandemic where national guidelines limited the use of bronchoscopy in patients affected by the virus due to concerns about spreading the virus within the hospital and to the healthcare workers. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of a novel adapter that avoids air leakage during bronchoscopy. Patients with respiratory failure on mechanical ventilation who require bronchoscopy will be randomized into two groups (groups A and B). These patients will be identified by the intensive care unit physician. Informed consent will be obtained from the patient's health care proxy. Patients in group A will undergo bronchoscopy using the standard commercially available adapter. Patients in group B will undergo bronchoscopy using the newly developed bronchoscope adapter. The efficacy of the bronchoscopy adapter will be evaluated by analyzing ventilator-associated parameters as well as the level of air contamination after the procedure. A bronchoscope adapter that limits air leak would have significant value in improving patient outcomes who receive bronchoscopy. Additionally, this would allow bronchoscopy to be more readily performed in patients with potential bacterial/viral pathogen spread. Primary objective: Determination of equivalency or superiority of the new "leak-free adapter" compared to the standard commercial adapter to enable safe bronchoscopy in ventilated patients requiring bronchoscopy. Secondary objective: To determine if the adapter provides improved ventilation during bronchoscopy by limiting tidal volume loss and pathogen aerosolization.

NCT ID: NCT05282238 Not yet recruiting - Respiratory Failure Clinical Trials

Quantification of Inspiratory Effort Through Nasal Pressure in Patients Undergoing Weaning From Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Correlation With Clinical Outcomes

NAIVE
Start date: May 1, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) constitutes a fundamental procedure in intensive care, covering up to 50% of time spent on ventilation (1). Endotracheal tube (ETT) removal might be an important but delicate step in intensive care setting. Failure and subsequent need for re-intubation can occur in up to 20% of cases leading to a significant increase in mortality rates (24%), longer hospital stay and prolonged need for ventilation. Comorbidities such as obesity, COPD and cardiac related diseases might further increase this risk reaching up to 60% of failure in extubation. In this scenario, accurate predictors of weaning failure are far welcomed. The recurrence of respiratory failure after extubation might considerably raise rates of failure, probably due to increased work of breathing in patients after ETT removal. Most recent guidelines on the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) suggest using NIV after ETT removal in subjects with high risk of failure. NIV could contribute to reduce work of breathing hence preventing the onset of respiratory failure after extubation. Therefore, measuring inspiratory effort and its variation in weaned patients might help in identifying patients with significant risk of failing extubation. Esophageal pressure swings (DeltaPES) can be measured through a nasogastric tube with a pressure transducer located in the inferior part of the esophagus. DeltaPES is an extremely precise and accurate method to quantify inspiratory effort, however its use in daily clinical practice is limited due to the invasive nature of the maneuver, elevated costs and need for considerable clinical training of operators. Physiological studies have shown a correlation between nasal pressure measured at nostril entrance and esophageal pressure (which in turn is a measure of respiratory effort . Therefore, measuring nasal pressure could represent a method to quantify inspiratory effort non-invasively, proving to be useful in daily clinical practice.

NCT ID: NCT05279391 Recruiting - Clinical trials for COVID-19 Severe Respiratory Failure

Combination of Inhaled DNase, Baricitinib and Tocilizumab in Severe COVID-19

Start date: October 25, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In patients with COVID-19, severe hypoxemic respiratory failure (SRF) leading to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), raises the mortality rate substantially. Thus, the management of patients with SRF to avoid intubation and intensive care admission is a challenging and crucial issue. This study describes, as rescue/compassionate treatment, a therapeutic protocol based on the multi-mechanistic nature of severe COVID-19, using the combination of inhaled DNase, Baricitinib and Tocilizumab on top of standard of care (SOC) consisting of heparin and dexamethasone. COVID-19 patients with SRF who were treated with SOC, SOC plus Anakinra (ANA), and SOC plus Tocilizumab (TOCI) will be studied as comparators. Primary endpoint will be the reduction of the in-hospital mortality rate, whereas secondary endpoints concern intubation rate, days of hospitalization and overall survival as derived from the last follow-up visit, either in-office or remote. This is a non-randomized, open-label, study, conducted in the First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Greece.

NCT ID: NCT05278390 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia

Automated Quantification of Radiologic Pulmonary Alteration During Acute Respiratory Failure: Application to the COVID-19 Pandemic

QUANTICO-PRO
Start date: June 13, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Automated quantification of the pulmonary volume impaired during acute respiratory failure could be helpful to assess patient severity during COVID-19 infection or perioperative medicine, for example. This study aims at assessing the correlation between the amount of radiologic pulmonary alteration and the clinical severity in two clinical situation : 1. SARS-CoV-2 infections 2. Postoperative hypoxemic acute respiratory failure.

NCT ID: NCT05277896 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Failure

Randomized Trial of Sedative Choice for Intubation

RSI
Start date: April 6, 2022
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Among critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation, one in five experience hypotension, cardiac arrest, or death. The sedatives used to rapidly induce anesthesia for emergency tracheal intubation have been hypothesized to effect cardiovascular complications and patient outcomes, but the optimal sedative medication for intubation of critically ill adults remains unknown. Ketamine and etomidate are the two most commonly used sedatives during intubation of critically ill adults. Data from a randomized clinical trial are urgently needed to determine the effect of ketamine versus etomidate on cardiovascular complications and clinical outcomes of emergency tracheal intubation.

NCT ID: NCT05274490 Completed - Respiratory Failure Clinical Trials

COPD Prognosis in Covid Patients

Start date: June 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

In this prospective observational study, patients were selected from attendees of the intensive care unit. Different measures and outcomes had been studied and compared between patients with and without COPD, including hospitalization, medical costs, length of Intensive care stay, respiratory failure, and death rate.