View clinical trials related to Rectal Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial study. According to the enrollment criteria, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who need neoadjuvant therapy before radical surgery were randomly divided into the organoids drug sensitivity group and the standard whole-course neoadjuvant therapy group. The Organoids drug sensitivity group was treated with personalized neoadjuvant therapy under the guidance of tumor organoids drug sensitivity technology combined with standard long-term radiotherapy. The standard whole-course neoadjuvant therapy group was treated with neoadjuvant simultaneous radiotherapy and chemotherapy (Total Neoadjuvant Therapy, TNT) based on guidelines and clinical experience. The tumor pathological complete remission rate (pCR), postoperative complication rate, postoperative tumor withdrawal grade, postoperative recurrence rate, treatment tolerance rate, R0 resection rate, and sphincter preservation rate were observed and compared.
A study to investigate if pelvic side wall lymph nodes that remain after neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be identified intraoperatively using dual radioisotope and fluorescence guidance.
Control of the effect of prehabilitation on postoperative morbidity, assessed by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), in patients diagnosed with rectal cancer that will receive neoadjuvant Quimiorradiotherapy (NCRT) and subsequent surgery, performed at the beginning of NCRT or before surgery.
Sarcopenia is defined as reduction in muscle mass and function according to the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in older people. Initially described for elderly patients, it is also presented as a negative prognostic factor in overall survival in oncology in certain locations (lung, ENT pathways, colon, pancreas) and more controversially for hemopathies. Its screening by measurement of skeletal muscle mass by CT scan and / or PET scan against L3 and by physical functional tests is not routinely integrated despite international recommendations. Sarcopenia is one of the characteristics of patient fragility that can induce more complications, lengthen the average length of hospital stay and reduce overall survival. The PRONOPALL score, a predictor score for survival validated by a previous study, will be correlated with the presence (or absence) of sarcopenia at inclusion for patients with a solid tumor (breast, ovary, prostate cancer , kidney, lungs, pancreas, colorectal). A prospective study on 38 patients with metastatic cancer was carried out at the Victor Hugo clinic in Le Mans between 01/JUN/21 and 31/AUG/21 (SPACE, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04714203): 25 patients were analyzable on the CT and PRONOPALL score data with a prevalence of sarcopenia of 60% and median overall survival of 14 months (unpublished data), clinical performance and muscle strength tests were not carried out (as in the publications cited above). A prospective study for the detection of sarcopenia is indicated by extending to blood diseases with the integration of clinical tests included in the initial APA (Adapted physical activity) assessment recommended for diagnosis.
To investigate dynamic change of gut microbiomes and metabolites, and their effects on immune modulation. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TNT with GEN-001 (Lactococcus lactis) and identify predictive biomarkers for pathologic response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
The treatment of locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancers is highly individualized to each patient and their pattern of disease, and this decision is often made at the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) meeting . The PelvEx collaborative was designed with the intent to provide greater international consensus on appropriate treatment decisions for this cohort. However, we propose that international variation exists in how certain patients will be evaluated, assessed and ultimately treated despite having the same disease. We plan to measure this variation in order to provide a greater understanding of the differences that exist.
This is a prospective, one arm phase II study aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with fruquintinib in treatment of patients with pMMR / MSS locally advanced rectal cancer with high immune score.
Advances in rectal cancer management have significantly reduced morbidity and mortality. The most commonly performed operation for rectal cancer is restorative proctectomy (RP), leaving up to 70% with long-term bowel dysfunction called Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS). LARS manifests as stool frequency, incontinence and difficult defecation. LARS, along with other functional impairments such as sexual and urinary dysfunction (SUD), can impact quality of life (QoL) and cause emotional distress. High-quality longitudinal data on these sequalae are lacking, leading to variable estimates of their prevalence, risk factors and prognosis. Most studies are European, cross-sectional, lack pre-treatment evaluation and long-term follow-up, and use inconsistent assessment measures. Thus, a North American study that evaluates patients longitudinally from diagnosis will provide quality data to fill this knowledge gap. The main aim of the proposed study is to contribute evidence regarding the impact of LARS, SUD, emotional/financial distress, and patient activation on long-term post-treatment QoL in North American rectal cancer after RP. This multicenter North American, observational, prospective cohort study relies on validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at diagnosis, during and post-treatment. Patients from 20 sites will be recruited over 2 years and followed for 3 years. The primary endpoint is QoL as measured by the European Organization for Research & Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire. We anticipate accrual of 1200 patients. Factors associated with QoL will be explored. Impact of patient activation in relation to functional outcomes on QoL over time will be explored using a difference-in-differences approach. The study involves a multidisciplinary team who will provide expertise in research methodology, nursing, oncology and surgery. The main contributions of this study are 1) provision of reference baseline North American values for important rectal cancer PROMs for clinical and research use, 2) an understanding of the evolution of functional outcomes and QoL post-treatment to counsel patients peri-operatively and throughout survivorship, and 3) to provide the basis for future tailored programs to support rectal cancer survivors.
Despite developments in the multidisciplinary treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), such as the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) by Heald et al. and the shift from adjuvant to neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT), local and distant recurrence rates remain between 5-10% and 25-40% respectively. Several studies established tumour characteristics with particularly bad prognosis; it was demonstrated that the occurrence of mesorectal fascia involvement (MRF+), grade 4 extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumour deposits (TD) and enlarged lateral lymph nodes (LLN) lead to high local and distant recurrence rates and decreased survival when compared with LARC without these particularly negative prognostic factors. This type of LARC is described as high risk LARC (hr-LARC). Achieving a resection with clear resection margins (R0) is an important prognostic factor for local (LR) and distant recurrence (DM) as well as survival. With the aim to further reduce the risk of recurrent rectal cancer, to diminish distant metastasis and to improve overall survival for patients with LARC, induction chemotherapy (ICT) became a growing area of research. The addition of ICT has the ability to induce more local tumour downstaging, possibly leading to resectability of previously unresectable tumours, more R0 resections and less extensive surgery. In the case of a complete clinical response, surgery may even be omitted. ICT may also have the potential to eradicate micrometastases. Hence, increased local downstaging and reducing distant metastatic spread may reduce LR and DM rates and improve survival and quality of life. In recent years, the use of ICT was investigated and showed promising results, but little is known about the addition of ICT in patients with high risk LARC. Since these patients have a particularly bad prognosis, both with regard to locoregional and distant failure, a more intensified neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFOXIRI is anticipated to improve short- and long term results.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the accuracy of MRI for selection of complete responders after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer .