View clinical trials related to Rectal Cancer.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine safety and anti-tumor immune activation generated by TG02 and Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), first as monotherapy (Part I), thereafter in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab (Part II), in patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent colorectal cancer scheduled to have surgery. Part I will include 4-6 patients and Part II will include up to 10 patients. Part I and Part II are separate and independent sequential components of the study. Patients will only be able to participate in either the Part I cohort or Part II cohort. Main objective of the study is to investigate safety and immune response after TG02-treatment.
Despite treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer relapses are frequent. Several attempts to improve these results with therapy intensification have shown modest effect on disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Recent studies with addition of sorafenib and cediranib revealed promising effect on tumor response with acceptable toxicity. Regorafenib is a multi tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with a broad mechanism of action. Therefore this trial investigates if similar results can be achieved as with sorafenib or cediranib.
Lateral lymph nodes (LLD) metastasis is a major cause of local recurrence for advanced rectal cancer. As for the treatment strategies on LLN metastasis, there are huge controversies on whether lateral pelvic lymph nodes dissection (LLND) after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) between Western and Eastern countries. Retrospective cohort evidences indicate that LLND following total mesorectal excision (TME) will bring benefit from cT3-4 rectal cancer, not regular predictive LLND, which will bring more side effects on the contrary. Existing reports tend to recommend LLND for specific individual with suspicious LLN metastasis. Moreover, there is a blank strict prospective randomized control study on the comparison of LLND+TME and LLND after nCRT. Therefore, our trial will compare the efficacy and safety of the two strategies for mid/low rectal cancer with suspicious LLN metastasis. The risk factors (such as radiologic factors, pathologic factors, and serum protein) to predict local recurrence and overall survival will be further investigated.
The purpose of this study is to compare the feasibility, safety, and quality of life (QOL) in patients (pts) undergoing protective ileostomy closure after 2 weeks with a closure after 12 weeks.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of transanal decompression tube as a bridge to surgery with stent as a bridge to surgery for acute malignant left-sided colonic and rectal obstruction.
The primary goal of this Brown University Oncology Research Group is to determine that a safe dose of BYL719 can be administered with capecitabine and radiation in patients with rectal cancer. Therefore, the threshold of success for this phase I study is to establish safety.
This phase Ib/II study is a prospective, open-label, single arm, nonrandomized study of PEP503(radio-enhancer). There are 2 portions in this study. - Escalation phase (Part Ib): A 3 + 3 dose escalation study design will be adopted in this phase to identify the recommended injection volume of PEP503 for intratumor injection. - Expansion phase (Part II): Following the confirmation of the recommended volume of intratumor injection, 18 additional patients will be enrolled at the recommended volume level to evaluate for efficacy.
This study will assess whether the Sienna+/Sentimag system, which involves a magnetic tracer, is effective in identifying the sentinel lymph node in rectal cancer and whether it is then feasible to remove this lymph node during surgery to locally excise early rectal cancer.
Clinical experience show limited effect of the drug Loperamide used to decrease output in stoma patients. Therefore the investigators see the need for a randomized blinded clinical trial to determine the effect of Loperamide opposite Placebo. Loperamide will be evaluated in relation to the following parameters - Change in ileostomy output in g/day in relation to oral intake - Quantification of the change in intestinal transit time using a radiopaque marker - The patient´s own assessment on which period they received Loperamide or Placebo
This is a randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter study to determine the difference in post-operative anastomotic leak rate in low anterior resection procedures where colon and rectal tissue perfusion is evaluated using PINPOINT as an adjunct to standard surgical practice compared to surgical procedures performed according to standard surgical practice alone.