View clinical trials related to Radiotherapy Side Effect.
Filter by:The objective of the RADPAINT-3 trial is to investigate whether dose painting is safe compared to standard radiotherapy. RADPAINT-3 is a randomized, non-inferiority, multi-center phase II study, initiated at the Section for Head and Neck Cancer, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, accruing from first half of 2024. The primary endpoint is frequency of grade ≥ 3 (CTCAE v5.0) mucosal ulcers one year after treatment. The expected inclusion period is three years, total study duration is six years and planned inclusion number is 100 patients. The collaborating sites are St Olav´s Hospital and Haukeland University Hospital. The patients will be randomized 1:1 to either standard radiotherapy (2 Gy x 34; total dose 68 Gy) or experimental radiotherapy (dose painting). All patients will have 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) prior to radiotherapy. In the experimental arm, we will escalate the dose to the hypermetabolic part of the tumor (maximum point dose 83.3 Gy), shown in pre-treatment FDG-PET images. Dose escalation will be applied to these regions during the first half of the fractionated treatment (17 of 34 fractions). The patients in both arms will receive concomitant nimorazole (hypoxic radiosensitizer) and concomitant cisplatin if indicated according to standard treatment. The main inclusion criterion is patients with human-papillomavirus (HPV)-unrelated head and neck cancer with poor prognosis. The RADPAINT-3 trial includes a translational sub-study where we aim to elucidate underlying mechanisms related to the radiotherapy effect, by investigating blood samples. Analysis of cytokines in repetitive blood samples may predict both tumor response and toxicity. The data derived from this sub-study, will be further explored using artificial intelligence. If RADPAINT-3 shows that there is no excess toxicity, we will continue the study after a new protocol has been approved. The new primary endpoint will be local control at 1 year after radiotherapy. Power analysis show that we will need in total 182 evaluable patients including the 100 patients from RADPAINT-3. The translational sub-study will then be extended to investigate genetic expression data from pre-therapy routine tumor biopsies and correlate this with the analysis of blood samples and tumor control.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of quantitative MR imaging and blood-based biomarkers to measure liver function in patients receiving radiation therapy for liver cancer or cancer that has spread to the liver.
The RO-PIP trial aims to determine the feasibility of recruitment to a trial randomising patients to salvage ultra-hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy or high dose rate brachytherapy and provide prospective data on patient recorded toxicity outcomes that will inform a future phase III trial.
Aim To test if proton therapy can improve survival compared to photon therapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC who are not candidates for standard definitive chemo-radiotherapy. Hypothesis The trial hypothesis is that proton therapy is less toxic than photon therapy in fragile patients and that this difference will mitigate to a difference in overall survival. Design Multicentre, randomized phase II study 1:1 Sample size 182 patients (91 in each arm) Treatment Radiotherapy (inhomogeneous dose distribution) 50 Gy/ 24 fraction Endpoint Primary: Overall survival at 12 months Secondary: progression free survival, time to loco-regional and distant failure, pattern of failure, acute and late toxicity, quality of life, patient compliance.
Using randomized control study, explore the effect of novel nutrition education program on the nutrition status and life quality of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy
The aim is to quantify the efficiency of the Safetac product Mepitel® Film on the prevention of radiodermatitis for cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy near the inguinal fold(s). Previous studies have looked into the differences in skin reactions for Mepitel® Film versus hydro-active colloid gel in breast cancer [1, 2] and head and neck cancer [3]. In breast cancer, the prevalence of radiation induced dermatitis has strongly decreased due to of modern radiotherapy techniques and fractionation. In the groin, however, this is not the case, and radiation dermatitis remains an important problem. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has looked into the efficiency of a prophylactic Mepitel® Film protocol in the inguinal fold. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether the Mepitel® Film offers a lower degree of radiation-induced dermatitis compared to hydro-active colloid gel and thereby challenging the gold standard. References: 1. Herst, P., Bennett, N., Sutherland, A., Peszynski, R., Paterson, D. and Jasperse, M. (2014). Prophylactic use of Mepitel Film prevents radiation-induced moist desquamation in an intra-patient randomised controlled clinical trial of 78 breast cancer patients. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 110(1), pp.137-143. 2. Møller, P., Olling, K., Berg, M., Habæk, I., Haislund, B., Iversen, A., Ewertz, M., Lorenzen, E. and Brink, C. (2018). Breast cancer patients report reduced sensitivity and pain using a barrier film during radiotherapy - A Danish intra-patient randomized multicentre study. Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology, 7, pp.20-25. 3. Wooding, H., Yan, J., Yuan, L., Chyou, T., Gao, S., Ward, I. and Herst, P. (2018). The effect of Mepitel Film on acute radiation-induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a feasibility study. The British Journal of Radiology, 91(1081), p.20170298.
Human recombinant endostatin preclinical studies have shown that the drug can inhibit endothelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis and tumor growth, still can directly induce lung cancer cell apoptosis, multiple clinical studies in human recombinant endostatin combined with chemotherapy treatment showed good antitumor efficacy and good safety.S1 is an oral fluorouracil derivative and an improved preparation of the antitumor drug tegafur.Multiple clinical studies have reported that S1 alone or S1 combined with chemotherapy is effective in Non small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Unfortunately, none of the prospective clinical studies to date have systematically validated the safety and efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced pulmonary SCC.The investigators expect that endu combined with S1 will increase the efficacy of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the objective remission rate and safety of entu combined with oral S1 in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.
In the present study, we will prospectively evaluate the pain response and treatment failure rate to determine the most favorable radiation dose in single fraction stereotactic radiotherapy using the modern highly conformal technique for bone metastases. Our findings should be able to provide evidence-based recommendation to support the utilization of single fraction radiotherapy for value-based oncology practice.
Cervical cancer radiotherapy patients have a decline in quality of life and sexual quality of life