View clinical trials related to Radiculopathy.
Filter by:Data will be collected in Hussain Memorial Hospital by taking informed consent. Randomised clinical trial is conducted taking thirty patients of both genders with confirmed diagnoses of cervical radiculopathy, their ages ranged from 25 to 60. A cluster of winner to rule out patient with cervical radiculopathy. They will be randomly assigned into two groups by the lottery method. Group A will receive conventional treatment and of spinal mobilization with arm movement (intervention 1) Group B will receive conventional treatment and positional SNAGs (intervention 2). The treatment will be conducted at a frequency of three sessions per week for four weeks. Two values will be taken, one as baseline and the other at end of the session. Then follow up the patient to rule out which intervention is more effective than the other. Neck Disability Index, Numeric Pain Rating Scale and ROM will be used to measure outcomes.
62 patients with postlumbar surgery syndrome were randomized and divided into two groups. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) was applied to the TFESI group (n=31), and caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) was applied to the CESI group (n=31). The age of the patients involved in this study ranged from 18 years old to 65 years old
The primary purpose of this study was to identify the ESPB spread level in the craniocaudal direction when performed at the T2 level. The secondary purpose was to determine the incidence of spread into epidural, paravertebral, intercostal, and intravascular injections with ESPB
This study compared the effects of mechanical and manual traction on pain, disability and lumbar spinal curvature in patients with discogenic low back pain
Neck pain is a frequently reported complaint of the musculoskeletal system which generally has a huge impact on health care expenditure; ascribed to visits to health care providers, disability, and sick leaves. A variety of manual therapy techniques including Cervical traction (CT) and neural mobilization techniques (NMTs) have been prescribed in the management of CR because of their immediate analgesic effect. Both techniques have been proposed to reduce pain and functional limitations in CR. Traction increases the separation of the vertebral bodies which eventually reduces the central pressure in the disk space and encourages the disk nucleus to get back to a central position. The current literature lends assistance to the utilization of the traction in addition to other physical therapy procedures for pain reduction, with less significant impact on function and disability. Further studies should investigate to explore the most effective traction method and dosage, the subgroups of patients with CR, or the pain stage (acute, subacute, or chronic) most benefited by this intervention and the physical therapy procedures that yield the most effective outcomes when combined with traction.
This study is a 2-armed parallel, multi-centered, pragmatic clinical trial that compares the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment for non-acute lumbar disc herniation.
To investigate the Effect of gross Myofascial Release on pain and function in cervical radiculopathy patients. BACKGROUND: cervical radiculopathy is considered serious problems causing neck pain & radiating pain which affect physical inactivity and function of a patient, thus gross Myofascial Release is a form of manual therapy technique that has a profound effect upon the musculoskeletal system. HYPOTHESES: This study hypothesized that: gross Myofascial Release on pain and function in cervical radiculopathy patients RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there an effect of gross Myofascial Release on pain and function in cervical radiculopathy patients?
Our study aims to compare the therapeutic effects of different taping materials and techniques on pain, functionality, and tissue temperature in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.
Cervical Radiculopathy is a clinical disorder of nerve root, and often is due to compressive or inflammatory pathology. There are number of different procedures which have been suggested for decreasing pain and disability in patients but manual therapy has been validated the effective technique. The objective of current research was to assess the comparative effectiveness of the Manual Cervical Traction and the Natural Apophyseal Glides on pain and disability among Cervical Radiculopathy patients. A parallel design, randomized controlled trial was performed on 72 patients in physiotherapy department, Mayo Hospital Lahore. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups after baseline testing. Group A received natural apophyseal glides and baseline treatment and group B received manual cervical traction and baseline treatment. Treatment period was of 3 weeks with 3 weekly sessions on alternate basis. Assessment was done before treatment at baseline and then by second and third week using numeric pain rating scale and neck disability index. SPSS version 25 was used to analyzed the data.
Objective of the study is to find out the effectiveness of nerve mobilization in patients with cervical radiculopathy. It is a single blinded randomized controlled trial using non-probability convenient sampling. Data is collected from University Physical therapy and Rehabilitation Clinic, University of Lahore, Pakistan. Alternate hypothesis: There is a significant role of nerve mobilizations in decreasing pain and disability among patients with cervical radiculopathy. Null hypothesis: There is no significant role of nerve mobilizations in decreasing pain and disability among patients with cervical radiculopathy. .