A Series of N-of-1 Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine Based on Bayesian Method

Quality of Life Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Series of N-of-1 Trials on Bronchiectasis Treated With Traditional Chinese Medicine Based on Bayesian Model

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04601792
• Other study ID #: haiyin huang
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: December 1, 2019
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: September 2020
• Source: Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
• Contact: Haiyin Huang, M.D.
• Phone: 008602165161782
• Email: huanghaiyin[@]shyueyanghospital.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The guiding role of parallel randomized controlled trials in clinical practice is limited due to the insufficiency of individual information. Our previous studies showed that Single case randomized controlled trials (referred to as N-of-1 trials) could reflect the individualized characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome differentiation with good feasibility, but the sensitivity was low. This study aims to compare the efficacy of treatment based on syndrome differentiation with controlled decoctions (placebo, and the method of strengthening the body resistance and removing phlegm) among patients with stable bronchiectasis through a series of N-of-1 trials (single-patient, double-blind, randomized, multiple crossover design), with the 7 point-likert scale of the most concerned symptoms as the main outcome. Hierarchical Bayesian statistical methods and some parameters and variables will be introduced, such as TCM syndrome type, potential residue effect of TCM, etc. The sensitivity and applicability of various mathematical models (Hierarchical Bayesian, paired t-test and Meta-analysis) for N-of-1 trials of TCM will be tested, for the purpose of improving the sensitivity and applicability of N-of-1 trials of TCM both on individual and group levels.

Description:

TCM has made great progress in the context of modern science and technology, but compared with the rapid development of modern medicine, the development of TCM has been relatively slow. The randomized controlled trial based on population is incompatible with the characteristics of TCM syndrome differentiation. The lack of reliable efficacy evaluation methods based on evidence-based medicine has hindered the internationalization and development of TCM. The clinical trial (International clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03147443) the investigators just finished found that the improved mixed effects model can detect the residual effect of TCM in the N-of-1 trials and improve the sensitivity of group data statistics. However, the sensitivity of this study method is low at the individual statistical level due to the inherent nature of N-of-1 trials, and more cases need to be studied for further improvement. Now that hierarchical Bayesian statistical method has become one of the major statistical methods in a series of N-of-1 trials. Compared with the frequentist statistical methods, the advantages of Bayesian method are as follows: (1) the integration analysis of both individual and group data can be carried out at the same time; (2) it is easy to introduce confounding variables, such as the physique or gene type of different subjects, or different TCM syndrome types (which are helpful to distinguish different TCM syndrome types and the difference of the effects); (3) in addition, there is a special advantage: if a large number of patients have completed similar N-of-1 trials with the variance within an individual patient greater than that between the patients, through "borrowing from strength" , the results of other patients can be used to improve the accuracy of an individual result, that is, to improve the sensitivity of N-of-1 trials, without the need to increase the pairs of N-of-1 trials. At present, this statistic method is rarely used in N-of-1 trials of TCM, so it is worth using for reference in our future research. The key hypothesis of this study is that: (1) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation will be better than placebo in patients with stable bronchiectasis through N-of-1 trials. (2) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation will be better than the same prescription minus heat-clearing Chinese herbs in patients with stable bronchiectasis through N-of-1 trials. However, at the individual level, with the severity of individual phlegm heat, the efficacy will be different, reflecting the effect of individual treatment based on syndrome differentiation of Chinese medicine. (3) Hierarchical Bayesian statistical model will improve the sensitivity and applicability of N-of-1 trials of TCM both on individual and group levels. In this study, the investigators will conduct a single center N-of-1 trials in 71 patients with stable bronchiectasis without hemoptysis and respiratory failure. These N-of-1 trials will be randomized, double-blind, crossover comparisons of individualized herbal decoction with control decoction within individual patients. Each N-of-1 trial will have 3 pairs of treatment periods. The duration of each treatment period will be 4 weeks. The investigators will compare: (1) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation (individualized decoction) with placebo, (2) the efficacy of syndrome differentiation (individualized decoction) with the same prescription minus heat-clearing Chinese herbs, in patients with stable bronchiectasis through a series of N-of-1 trials. The primary outcome is patient self-reported symptoms (such as cough, expectoration, shortness of breath, chest pain, and fatigue) scores on a 7 point likert scale. Secondary outcomes are 24-hour sputum volume and the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) scores. Hierarchical Bayesian statistical methods and some parameters and variables will be introduced, such as TCM syndrome type, potential residue effect of TCM, etc. The sensitivity and applicability of various mathematical models (Hierarchical Bayesian, paired t-test and Meta-analysis) for N-of-1 trials of TCM will be tested, for the purpose of improving the sensitivity and applicability of N-of-1 trials of TCM both on individual and group levels.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 71
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 70 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• according to the consensus of domestic experts, combined with the guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis published by the European Respiratory Society in 2017;
• male or female, aged 18-70 years;
• being in the stable stage, and no acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis within the past three weeks;
• frequency of acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis =3 times every year;
• signed informed consent for participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

• failing to meet the above criteria for diagnosis and inclusion;
• having developed respiratory failure with estimated survival time less than one year;
• having hemoptysis as a comorbidity;
• having complications by active tuberculosis;
• being pregnant or with severe heart, liver, or kidney dysfunctions;
• participating in other pharmacological clinical trials within the past 3 months.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Bronchiectasis
• Individuality
• Quality of Life
• Sputum
• Symptoms
• Traditional Chinese Medicine

Intervention

Drug:
• Individualized Decoction
Applied in the Tested Drug Observation Period. It is the highly individualized treatment of TCM, the modification of Bronchiectasis Stabilization Decoction (Rhizoma Fagopyri Cymosi 30g, Radix Lithospermi 15g, Radix Ophiopogonis 15g, Poria cocos 15g, Radix Astragali 20g, Rhizoma Bletillae 10g, Platycodon grandiflorum 10g, Semen Coicis 30g) based on syndrome differentiation. For example, for patients with qi and yin deficiency syndrome, the investigators added Adenophora Root, Radix Glehniae and Radix Rehmanniae Recens etc. For patients with phlegm-heat syndrome, the investigators added Radix Scutellariae and Viola Yedoensis etc. Besides, the herbs in a prescription could be changed according to different symptoms of individual patients.
• placebo
Applied in the placebo Observation Period. Placebo is made by dextrin, bitter agent, edible pigment etc. and added 5% test drug. The test drug and control drug have no differences in dosage form, appearance, color, specification, label, and so forth.
• Tested drug minus heat-clearing herbs
It is the decoction of the Syndrome Differentiation Decoction (tested drug) minus heat-clearing herbs. For example, heat-clearing herbs such as Scutellaria Baicalensis, Rhizoma Coptidisor Herba Violae will be removed from the Syndrome Differentiation Decoction.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine	Shanghai

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine	Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (6)

Dodd JW, Hogg L, Nolan J, Jefford H, Grant A, Lord VM, Falzon C, Garrod R, Lee C, Polkey MI, Jones PW, Man WD, Hopkinson NS. The COPD assessment test (CAT): response to pulmonary rehabilitation. A multicentre, prospective study. Thorax. 2011 May;66(5):425 — View Citation

Guyatt G,Rennie D. Users'Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice[M].Chicago: American Medical Association Press,2002:3-11.

Huang H, Yang P, Wang J, Wu Y, Zi S, Tang J, Wang Z, Ma Y, Zhang Y. Investigation into the Individualized Treatment of Traditional Chinese Medicine through a Series of N-of-1 Trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Feb 7;2018:5813767. doi: 10.115 — View Citation

Huang H, Yang P, Xue J, Tang J, Ding L, Ma Y, Wang J, Guyatt GH, Vanniyasingam T, Zhang Y. Evaluating the Individualized Treatment of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Pilot Study of N-of-1 Trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:148730. doi: — View Citation

Jones PW, Price D, van der Molen T. Role of clinical questionnaires in optimizing everyday care of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:289-96. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S18181. Epub 2011 May 26. Review. — View Citation

Lee BY, Lee S, Lee JS, Song JW, Lee SD, Jang SH, Jung KS, Hwang YI, Oh YM. Validity and Reliability of CAT and Dyspnea-12 in Bronchiectasis and Tuberculous Destroyed Lung. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2012 Jun;72(6):467-74. doi: 10.4046/trd.2012.72.6.467. E — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Treatment preference for TCM	Proportion of patients who prefer to continue TCM treatment after the conclusion of the N-of-1 trial.	Through study completion, an average of half a year
Other	Change in of the alanine aminotransferase (ALT), to evaluate the safety of TCM treatment	Alanine aminotransferase, ALT in U/L.	Baseline and month 6
Other	Change in of the blood urea nitrogen (BUN), to evaluate the safety of TCM treatment	Blood urea nitrogen, BUN in mmol/L.	Baseline and month 6
Other	Change in of the serum creatinine (Scr), to evaluate the safety of TCM treatment	Serum creatinine, Scr in µmol/L.	Baseline and month 6
Primary	Patient Self-Rated Symptom Score (likert scale)	Patients rated the severity of the symptoms (such as cough, expectoration, shortness of breath and chest pain) on a 7 point likert scale. Optimize the number of questions to ensure that the most important aspects of the patient's problem are detected (usually four to eight items). Every day each patient scored the severity of these problems on the 7 point Likert scales supplemented by Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). The higher the score, the more severe the symptom.; The investigators consider an improvement of 0.5 points per question corresponds to a noticeable improvement in the patient's well-being. If there are seven questions, a total change of 3.5 or more points is considered clinically significant. Thus the mean difference of 0.5 points was defined as the "Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)" for the 7 point scales.	4 weeks
Secondary	24 hours sputum volume	The investigators measured the 24h sputum volume at the beginning and the end of each treatment period of the trial. To ensure the accuracy of the measurement, the investigators asked the patients to spit sputum into a collector with scales from 8:00 am to the next 8:00 am. The investigators used the mean value of the sputum volume for 3 consecutive days as the outcome.	4 weeks
Secondary	COPD Assessment Test (CAT)	The CAT had been proven to be effective and reliable in patients with bronchiectasis. CAT questionnaire is composed of 8 items. Each item has a score ranging from 0 to 5, thereby making the total score range from 0 to 40. Score of 0 represents the best quality of life and 40 does the worst. The MCID for the CAT has not been established officially, but it was estimated to be around 2 points.	4 weeks