View clinical trials related to Pulpitis.
Filter by:The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn the effect of using local corticosteroids and maintaining apical patency in reducing post-preparation pain in patients with acute irreversible pulpitis in molar teeth. The main question it aims to answer is: • How effective are using local corticosteroids and maintaining apical patency in reducing post-preparation pain in patients with acute irreversible pulpitis? Participants will be asked to fill a visual analogue scale to record their pain, after receiving a root canal treatment while using local corticosteroids or not as well as maintaining apical patency or not. Researchers will compare the use of corticosteroids and maintaining apical patency in reducing post-operative pain.
Title: Comparative evaluation of direct pulp capping and complete pulpotomy in mature permanent mandibular molars with clinical signs indicative of moderate pulpitis: Randomized Clinical Trial Rationale: According to new Wolters pulpal clinical classification, Moderate pulpitis exhibit symptoms of prolonged reaction to cold, which can last for minutes, possibly percussion sensitive and spontaneous dull pain which are correspond to irreversible pulpitis. Complete/partial pulpotomy are suggested to be the choice of treatment for such cases. It has been suggested that infection is often the cause of inflammation, an inflamed pulp should be able to heal if the source of infection is eliminated as in other body organs. Removal of trigger (i.e. caries) followed by application of biocompatible material which makes a good seal in a sterile environment has potential to allow for recovery and healing of the inflamed pulp tissue which is thought to be beyond recovery. Based on this premise, DPC can be considered as minimally invasive approach for the management of teeth with inflamed pulps in place of the conventional approach of partial/complete pulpotomy in adults Research Question Does Direct Pulp Capping have comparable outcome with complete pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with clinical signs indicative of moderate pulpitis?
Clinical and radiographic assessment of A-prf,A-prf combined with nanochitosan compared to chitosan for symptomatic irreversible pulpits in lower permanent first molar
This in- vivo study was conducted to evaluate the response of human pulp tissue following direct pulp capping using four different pulp capping agents in premolars scheduled for extraction in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
The aim of this randomised control trial is to compare the effect of different concentrations of NaOCl on outcome of partial pulpotomy in teeth with clinical signs indicative of irreversible pulpitis. The main question it aims to answer are: 1. clinical and radiographic outcome of partial pulpotomy following use of 5% and 3% NaOCl in mature permanent teeth with clinical signs indicative of irreversible pulpitis. 2. OHRQoL and pain experience after use of 5% and 3% NaOCl during partial pulpotomy in teeth with clinical signs indicative of irreversible pulpitis.
Summary: After a root canal procedure, it is common to experience postoperative pain. Cleaning the root canal thoroughly is crucial for pain relief, but removing all debris with standard methods is difficult. Irrigation, using either traditional endodontic needles or newer methods like endodontic activation, helps clean the canal. This study aims to compare pain levels after using conventional needles versus an Endo1 Ultrasonic Endo Activate Device for irrigation. Patients will undergo standard root canal preparation and then be randomly assigned to one of two groups for final irrigation: the Endo1 device (EA) and the conventional endodontic needles (EN). The study will provide insights into which method is more effective in reducing postoperative pain.
Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis is a painful condition that requires anesthesia to perform effective dental procedures. The mental nerve block and inferior alveolar nerve block are two commonly used techniques for achieving anesthesia in the mandibular teeth. Study design: This randomized clinical trial study Number of participants: 96 participants which will be randomly divided into two groups: MINB and IANB. Inclusion criteria: Participants with mandibular premolars or lower anterior experiencing sharp and persistent pain in response to thermal stimuli and an electric pulp tester, as well as bleeding during access opening, will be included. Exclusion criteria: Participants with a medical history, allergies or contraindications to the local anesthetic, pregnant or breastfeeding women, those taking pain-affecting medication, or those experiencing pain in more than one tooth will be excluded. Both techniques will use 2% lidocaine and adrenaline 1:80,000. Age, gender, and the efficacy of anesthesia will be recorded in both groups. The chi-square test will be used for comparison.
To evaluate the effectiveness of intra-osseous anesthesia using Quicksleepr5 in pain elimination during dental treatment in maxillary and mandibular primary molars, compared to conventional anesthesia.
The goal of this interventional randomized clinical trial is to test the effect of magnification and clinical experience of the operator on the success rate of full pulpotomy in mature adult molar teeth. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does the use of magnification raise the success rate of full pulpotomy of mature adult molars? - Does the clinical experience of the operator dentist raise the success rate of full pulpotomy of mature adult molars? Participants will be asked to do the following: - Receive the pulpotomy treatment of their target molar tooth. - Record the pain score in the pain assessment chart. - Attend the follow-up visits. They'll receive a full pulpotomy treatment of their target molar tooth. Researchers will evaluate the usage of magnification in performing the pulpotomy procedure of adult molar teeth by postgraduate or undergraduate operators in comparison to performing the same pulpotomy procedure without magnification to see if it raises the overall success rate of pulpotomy.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate post-operative pain (PEP) in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis following Vital Pulpotomy Treatments (VPT) with Calcium Silicate Cement (CSC). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the post-operative pain one week after VPT significantly lower than pre-operative pain in permanent molars with symptomatic pulpitis? - How does post-operative pain in these teeth correlate with patient-related factors, such as age, gender, and painkiller intake? Participants will: - Undergo Vital Pulpotomy Treatment with Calcium Silicate Cement (MTA) - Provide pain level assessments before VPT, immediately post-treatment, and at 24, 72 hours, and 1 week after treatment. If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare the post-operative pain levels in teeth with symptomatic pulpitis undergoing VPT to assess its effectiveness in reducing pain compared to a control group not undergoing the treatment.