Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03553407
Other study ID # Laser
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2018
Est. completion date June 1, 2020

Study information

Verified date March 2019
Source University of Sao Paulo
Contact Isabel F Tortamano
Phone 551130918030
Email iptortam@usp.br
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The present study has the objective of evaluating whether the previous therapy with low intensity laser, through its analgesic effect, can promote a greater comfort specifically for patient with pulpitis in mandibular molars. 75 patients with pain from mandibular molar pulpitis will be selected for this study (randomized and double blind) and divided into 3 groups (n = 25): Group 1 - Pulse Laser (880nm, 30mW, 3,6J / cm², 25Hz) ; Group 2 - Continuous Laser (880nm; 30mW; 3.6J / cm²); Group 3 - Placebo. The efficacy of the laser will be assessed using the VAS scale 10 minutes after the laser application, immediately before the blockade is performed.


Description:

Anxiety, pain and discomfort are situations of great stress in the daily routine of clinical practice, and especially in the practice of the dental emergency sector. Several studies have concluded that low-intensity laser therapy has been shown to be effective in pain management. However, the majority report the use of laser in the treatment of chronic pain, few studies show its application in acute pain and only one study evaluated the effect of low laser on acute pain of pulp inflammation, but with other parameters. In addition, because of the inflammatory process and several factors of unknown origin, the anesthetic agent can not always promote complete analgesia, especially when faced with mandibular molars. Therefore, the present study has the objective of evaluating whether the previous therapy with low intensity laser, through its analgesic effect, can promote a greater comfort specifically for this type of patient. 75 patients with pain from mandibular molar pulpitis will be selected for this study (randomized and double blind) and divided into 3 groups (n = 25): Group 1 - Pulse Laser (880nm, 30mW, 3,6J / cm², 25Hz) ; Group 2 - Continuous Laser (880nm; 30mW; 3.6J / cm²); Group 3 - Placebo. The pain will be evaluated by means of an VAS score in 6 different times: initial pain, immediately after and 10 minutes after irradiation with the laser, 10 minutes after inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), during conventional endodontic treatment, after the end of the procedure. (T0, T1, T1 ', T2, T3 and T4). The efficacy of the laser application will be assessed using the VAS scale 10 minutes after the laser application, immediately before the blockade is performed. The use of the laser will be considered effective if the patient reports a reduction in the VAS scale of 2 points, between the initial moment and 10 minutes after the laser application. Analgesia will be evaluated during the pulpectomy procedure with the use of the verbal analogue scale 0 to 3. Analgesic effect will be considered if the professional can finish the procedure without the patient reporting 2 or 3 on this scale. The data obtained between the different groups and schedules will be compared statistically, and the statistical test chosen will depend on the normality of the data. The data obtained between the different groups and times will be compared statistically, and the statistical test chosen will depend on the normality of the data.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 75
Est. completion date June 1, 2020
Est. primary completion date March 1, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 50 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- ASA I patients, according to the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)

- 18 and 50 years

- Systolic pressure below 140 mmHg and diastolic below 90 mmHg and heart rate between 70 - / + 20 beats / minute

- Pulpectomy in the first and / or lower second molars, which has at least one adjacent molar tooth and a contralateral canine; or absence of deep cavities, extensive restorations, advanced periodontal disease and no history of trauma or sensitivity.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with a history of sensitivity to local anesthetics and sulfur

- Pregnant or suspected of pregnancy

- Users of medications that may interact with the local anesthetic, such as, anxiolytics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, ß-blockers and antihistaminic agents

- Patients with septic process near the injection site

- Patients under orthodontic treatment

- Patients with heart disease, neurological disease, hyperthyroidism and diabetes; drug users.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Low Level Laser - Pulse
The laser will be applied at a single point in contact, perpendicular to the surface of the tooth in a region that presents healthy enamel, towards the pulp chamber. The laser chosen was the low power diode laser with the following protocols: Group 1 (880nm, 30mW, 3.6 J / cm², 25 Hz) and Group 2 (880nm, 30mW, 3.6 J / cm²), after 10 minutes we will ask to the patient again from 0 to 3 the level of pain, to then proceed to the anesthetic phase.
Low Level Laser - continuous
The laser will be applied at a single point in contact, perpendicular to the surface of the tooth in a region that presents healthy enamel, towards the pulp chamber. The laser chosen was the low power diode laser with the following protocols: Group 1 (880nm, 30mW, 3.6 J / cm², 25 Hz) and Group 2 (880nm, 30mW, 3.6 J / cm²), after 10 minutes we will ask to the patient again from 0 to 3 the level of pain, to then proceed to the anesthetic phase.
Low Level Laser - placebo
placebo will be applied at a single point in contact, perpendicular to the surface of the tooth in a region that presents healthy enamel, towards the pulp chamber. The laser chosen was the low power diode laser with the following protocols: Group 1 (880nm, 30mW, 3.6 J / cm², 25 Hz) and Group 2 (880nm, 30mW, 3.6 J / cm²), after 10 minutes we will ask to the patient again from 0 to 3 the level of pain, to then proceed to the anesthetic phase.

Locations

Country Name City State
Brazil University of Sao Paulo São Paulo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Sao Paulo

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

References & Publications (1)

Ramalho KM, de Souza LM, Tortamano IP, Adde CA, Rocha RG, de Paula Eduardo C. A randomized placebo-blind study of the effect of low power laser on pain caused by irreversible pulpitis. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Dec;31(9):1899-1905. Epub 2016 Oct 1. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain reduction in VAS score The success of laser use was defined as a reduction of more than 2 in the patient's pain report between the initial moment and 10 minutes after the laser application 10 minutes
Secondary Analgesia The success of IANB associated with laser therapy will be defined as the ability to access the pulp chamber and perform the pulpectomy without the pain being classified as uncomfortable by the patient (0 to 1 scale) during the treatment,which takes almost 30 minutes to be completed 30 minutes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06268912 - Cryoanalgesia for Irreversible Pulpitis N/A
Completed NCT06330519 - Impact of Different Techniques on The Efficacy of Anaesthesia in Mandibular Molars With Acute Irreversible Pulpitis Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05336682 - Evaluation of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Techniques Versus Pulpectomy in Primary Molars With Inflammed Pulp N/A
Recruiting NCT06438523 - A-prf,Nanochitosan Combined With A-prf Compared to Chitosan for Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis of Mature Teeth N/A
Recruiting NCT03956199 - Pulpotomy vs.Root Canal Treatment in Managing Irreversible Pulpitis N/A
Completed NCT03174860 - Effect of Preoperative Diclofenac Potassium on Articaine Buccal Infitration Success Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05853185 - Assessing Success of MTA and Pre-mixed Bioceramic in Mature Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis With Full Pulpotomy. Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT03612323 - Comparison Between Intraligamentary Piroxicam and Articaine Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT02953912 - Assessment of Postoperative Pain Using Reciproc Versus One Shape Files in Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis N/A
Completed NCT04308863 - Evaluation of Chitosan Scaffold and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis Phase 2
Completed NCT04719247 - Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Turmeric, Thymus Vulgaris, Nigella Sativa and Aloe Vera as Pulpotomy Medicaments in Primary Teeth N/A
Completed NCT05582317 - Efficacy of Combination of Biodentine and Simvastatin as a Pulp Capping Materials in Vital Pulpotomy of Primary Molars N/A
Recruiting NCT05402098 - Outcome Following Endodontic Treatment Using Traditional Access Versus Conservative Access N/A
Recruiting NCT05406557 - Partial Versus Miniature Pulpotomy in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis N/A
Recruiting NCT05902936 - Evaluation of Nano Bioactive Glass Combined With i-PRF Scaffold in Vital Pulp Treatments N/A
Completed NCT05904184 - Comparison of Calcium Silicate-based Sealer and Epoxy Resin-based Sealer Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT03916900 - Postoperative Pain and Success Rate in Pulpotomy Versus Root Canal Treatment N/A
Completed NCT06088446 - Effect of Intrapulpal Injections on the Post-endodontic Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05964933 - Pulpotomy vs Root Canal Treatment for Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis N/A
Withdrawn NCT04996641 - Endodontic-Restorative Pre-Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients N/A