Clinical Trials Logo

Pulmonary Embolism clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Pulmonary Embolism.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06194617 Recruiting - Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Trials

Rivaroxaban in Elderly Chinese Venous Thromboembolism Patients

Start date: April 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

There's no unified recommendation in clinical practice regarding adjusting dosages for different patient types, especially when adverse events occur. While rivaroxaban typically doesn't require coagulation monitoring, in elderly patients, particularly those with multiple medications, finding appropriate lab indicators becomes crucial to gauge its anticoagulant effect. This aids in evaluating precise rivaroxaban dosing for the elderly, balancing bleeding risks and recurrence. Clinical pharmacological studies suggest that drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in different populations can guide dosage optimization. Hence, this study aims to provide a basis for optimizing dosing regimens in high-risk elderly patients in China by exploring pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indicators in clinical practice.

NCT ID: NCT06192199 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

The Diagnostic Value of APTT/Fibrinogen Ratio in Pulmonary Embolism

Start date: January 1, 2024
Phase:
Study type: Observational

From January 1, 2023 to December 30, 2023, patients who were suspected of pulmonary embolism and underwent CTPA examination at Nanyang Hospital of Southern Medical University were divided into pulmonary embolism group and non pulmonary embolism group. 1. Collect relevant data, including gender, age, primary disease, CTPA imaging and reports, BNP, troponin, electrocardiogram, cardiac ultrasound, PT, APTT, TT, fibrinogen, D-dimer, etc., and analyze demographic data, pulmonary embolism risk grading, APTT/fibrinogen ratio, and determine their cut-off values through statistical analysis of the two groups. 2. Follow up on the APTT/fibrinogen ratio after anticoagulation treatment and bleeding in the pulmonary embolism group.

NCT ID: NCT06190392 Not yet recruiting - Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Trials

Effect of a Global Simplified Strategy on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

MODS STRATEGY
Start date: January 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently suspected in emergency departments (ED) patients which often leads to the prescription of DDimer testing and irradiative chest imaging (Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiogram CTPA in most cases).[1] Indeed, an increased use of CTPA has been reported without clear benefit in terms of prognosis.This increased use is reportedly associated with potential overdiagnosis of PE, increased cost, length of ED stay, and side effects from both chest imaging and undue anticoagulant treatments. The standard diagnostic strategy for PE work up includes three steps with an initial evaluation of clinical probability, followed by D-dimer testing if indicated, followed by chest imaging if necessary - Computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram CTPA being the imaging modality of choice. A large European prospective study has reported that the use of CTPA has constantly increased without change in the diagnostic yield. In order to reduce the use of CTPA, it has been validated that in patients with a low likelihood of PE, the D-dimer threshold for ordering CTPA can be raised at 1000 ng/ml. It has been validated that a low likelihood of PE can be determined either with the YEARS or the PEGeD clinical decision rules. These latter two include one common item being "Is PE the most likely diagnosis". A retrospective cohort study of 3330 patients reported that using this sole question of "Is PE the most likely diagnosis" can be safely used to raise the D-dimer threshold to 1000 ng/ml, and that this performs as well as YEARS and PEGeD. This simple question is easier to use by emergency physicians compared to complex ones, which are reportedly seldom used by emergency physicians. Therefore, the validation of the "PE unlikely" simple and straightforward decision rule could increase physicians' adherence and therefore limit the use of chest imaging. The hypothesis of this prospective study is that the likelihood of PE assessed to elevate the DDimer threshold to 1000 ng/ml can be estimated by the sole question of "is PE the most likely diagnosis", and to validate a global simplified diagnostic strategy for PE in the ED. The intervention will be the patient's management with a simplified global strategy. Whether PE is the most likely diagnostic will be assessed by the unstructured implicit clinician's estimation. In patient with a clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism: DDimer testing will be performed. If the likelihood of PE is low (PE is not the most likely diagnosis), then threshold for DDimer testing will be 1000 ng/ml. If the likelihood of PE is high (PE is the most likely diagnosis), then the age-adjusted DDimer threshold will be applied.

NCT ID: NCT06189313 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Cardiovascular Diseases

CLEANer Aspiration for Pulmonary Embolism

CLEAN-PE
Start date: May 23, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Cleanerâ„¢ Pro Thrombectomy System for aspiration thrombectomy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

NCT ID: NCT06187987 Recruiting - Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Trials

Mechanical Thrombectomy With the FlowTriever Device in Acute Pulmonary Embolism - a Retrospective Analysis

Start date: April 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

International guidelines recommend intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). In high-risk PE where IVT is contraindicated or has failed, surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed intervention (CDI) is recommended. CDI is also recommended as an alternative in patients with intermediate-risk PE with haemodynamic deterioration during anticoagulation treatment. Although there is a lack of randomized studies comparing CDI to anticoagulation or systemic thrombolysis in PE, several studies and recent meta-analyses have shown that CDI is an effective treatment that is associated with fewer complications than IVT, especially bleeding.

NCT ID: NCT06183944 Recruiting - Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Trials

Data Acquisition Study With Artificial Intelligence and Phenotyping of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism

PEPITE
Start date: December 11, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The initial aim is to build and validate artificial intelligence tools (machine learning and Natural Language Processing) to acquire and structure data from medical reports at the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon - la Seyne sur mer (CHITS). This project will build upon work previously done by the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data (DEBDS) at the Centre Antoine Lacassagne (CAL) in Nice, focusing on breast and thyroid cancers. The idea is to validate the transferability of these tools to another establishment with different pathologies and practitioners, specifically the vascular medicine department at CHITS. Subsequently, the aim will be to identify clinically relevant phenotypes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Hierarchical clustering methods combined with unsupervised learning (machine learning) will be used to obtain groups of patients who are homogeneous at diagnosis. Evaluating their prognosis at 6 months (recurrence or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension), account the first 3 months of anticoagulant treatment, would provide an aid to medical decision-making. This research will include a retrospective and a prospective parts. The retrospective part will include patients who have been admitted to CHITS for acute pulmonary embolism since 2019. For the prospective part, it is planned to include patients with same characteristics over the years 2024 and 2025. More than 2,500 patients are expected to be included. This research will have no impact on current patient care. Data from consultations and various examinations carried out as part of care will be collected for six months post-diagnosis in order to meet the research objectives.

NCT ID: NCT06166329 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Non-severe Pulmonary Embolism

Interest of the Chair Lift Test in the Prognostic Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: a Single-center Open Prospective Study

SIT-EP
Start date: December 20, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The objective of the study is to evaluate the prognostic performance of the chair lift test in the initial assessment of the severity of non-severe pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients, in comparison with the current pulmonary embolism risk stratification score using the sPESI score refined by the use of cardiac biomarkers and right ventricular dysfunction

NCT ID: NCT06152341 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Pulmonary Embolism Acute

Safety and Effectiveness of the ATC System in the Treatment of Acute PE

Start date: July 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is a prospective, single-arm, interventional, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ATC System in subjects with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

NCT ID: NCT06143969 Recruiting - Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Trials

Ultrasound-assisted, Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Acute Intermediate-high-risk Pulmonary Embolism

USAT IH-PE
Start date: November 28, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The purpose of this retrospective and prospective multicenter study is to evaluate the incidence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) within 6 months from ultrasound-assisted, Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for acute intermediate- high-risk Pulmonary Embolism

NCT ID: NCT06135220 Recruiting - Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Trials

Non-invasive Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism by Use of Biomarkers in Exhaled Breath

NILEX
Start date: January 11, 2024
Phase:
Study type: Observational

In this study, a new, non-invasive method for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) will be tested. In pre-clinical studies, the investigators have identified 151 putative biomarkers for pulmonary embolism in the exhaled breath, and several of these were also found in a first in-human clinical study what the investigators performed in 2019-2020 (DOI 10.1088/1752-7163/ad0aaa). These biomarkers need consolidation in a clinical setting using an updated collection device and proteomic analysis platform before development of a prototype and further test of this new diagnostic method.