Effect of Pharmacologic Interaction Between ERAs and PDE-5 Inhibitors on Medication Serum Levels and Clinical Disease Status in Patients With PAH

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Clinical Trial

— EPIC  

Official title:

Effect of Pharmacologic Interaction Between Endothelin-Receptor-Antagonists and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors on Medication Serum Levels and Clinical Disease Status in Patients Wih Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02484807
• Other study ID #: EPIC-01
• Status: Completed
• Start date: May 2015
• Est. completion date: December 2016

Study information

• Verified date: January 2020
• Source: Heidelberg University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The development of disease-targeted medication for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has significantly improved within the last years, leading to the development of 10 approved agents. Combination treatment with Endothelin-Receptor-Antagonists (ERA) and Phosphodiesterase-Type-5-Inibitors (PDE-5-Inhibitor) has become increasingly important for the treatment of PAH. In a recent press release, the results of the AMBITION study reported that an upfront combination treatment immediately after diagnosis leads to a delayed disease progression [4]. Thus, the question if there is a clinically relevant pharmaco-dynamic drug-drug interaction is of rising interest.

Description:

Mechanisms of action Three ERAs have been approved for the treatment of PAH including the dual inhibitors Bosentan and Macitentan and the selective Endothelin Receptor type A inhibitor (ETA-Inhibitor) Ambrisentan. The dual antagonists inhibit both ETA- and the type B (ETB)-receptor, while the selective antagonist only affects the ETA-receptor [2]. The physiologic ligand of the receptors is Endothelin-1, which binds to the ETA-receptor and causes vasoconstriction and proliferation of the vascular smooth muscle cells. The binding to the ETB-receptor leads to an endogenous production of NO and prostacyclin in the endothelial cells.

PDE-5-Inhibitors include the two substances Sildenafil and Tadalafil. They inhibit the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMPs), which triggers the vasodilative effect of endothelial NO.

Interaction There is evidence for the pharmacokinetic interaction (inhibition / induction of critical targets of drug metabolism and drug distribution) of both substance classes: the PDE-5-Inhibitors Sildenafil and Tadalafil are mainly eliminated in the liver by the hepatic enzyme Cytochrom-P450-Oxygenase type 3A4 (CYP3A4). The dual inhibitor Bosentan is both a substrate and an inductor of the Cytochrom-P450-Oxydase type 3A4 and type 2C9 [5,6].

It has already been shown in an in vivo-study, that simultaneous application of PDE-5-Inhibitors and Bosentan leads to a systemic reduction of the PDE-5-Inhibitor concentration of 40%, due to the CYP3A4-inducing effect of Bosentan [5]. Sildenafil, in contrast, leads to a decreased degradation of Bosentan in the liver with an approximately 50% increase in plasma leves. An anticipated result, especially when higher dosages of Sildenafil are applied, is the accumulation of Bosentan and reduction of Sildenafil levels.

A recent in vitro-study has shown that Tadalafil may also serve as CYP3A4-inductor, while this effect has not been detected for Sildenafil [7].

In contrast Macitentan which has been approved in 2013, has no clinically relevant CYP3A4-inducing effects. [8]. The in vitro-study has also detected a further interaction between ERAs and PDE-5-Inhibitors. Both PDE-5-Inhibitors Sildenafil and Tadalafil affect the transport molecules organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), which are responsible for the hepatocellular intake of the dual ERA Bosentan. They also had a mild effect on the intake of Ambrisentan.

Sildenafil is a potent inhibitor of OATPs, whereas Tadalafil shows only minor inhibition of OATPs [7]. Both Sildenafil and Tadalafil significantly reduce the intracellular concentration of Bosentan in the liver, leading to a reduced degradation of Bosentan. For Ambrisentan this effect seemed to be less pronounced [7]. Consequently, this mechanisms of action lead to higher ERA-levels and to decreased PDE-5-Inhibitor plasma concentrations in patients receiving combination treatment. The most distinct interaction is expected for the combination of Sildenafil (PDE-5-Inhibitor) and Bosentan (ERA).

Up to now, the prevalence and role of this pharmacokinetic interaction for the clinical status and progression of the disease is not clear. Respective combination treatments have only been investigated in healthy male volunteers so far [5,9].

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 125
• Est. completion date: December 2016
• Est. primary completion date: December 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Men and women = 18 years old

2. Diagnosis of PAH according to ESC/ERS-guidelines: patients with manifest pulmonary arterial hypertension, mean pulmonary arterial pressure =25mmHg, measured by right heart catheterization.

3. Combination treatment with ERA (Bosentan, Ambrisentan or Macitentan) and PDE-5-Inhibitor (Sildenafil or Tadalafil) for more than 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Underage patients

2. Pregnancy or lactation

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Familial Primary Pulmonary Hypertension
• Hypertension
• Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Intervention

Other:
• no intervention, only observation of different groups

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	Centre for pulmonary hypertension, Thoraxclinic at the University Hospital Heidelberg	Heidelberg

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Heidelberg University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

References & Publications (8)

Burgess G, Hoogkamer H, Collings L, Dingemanse J. Mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between steady-state bosentan and sildenafil. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;64(1):43-50. Epub 2007 Nov 27. — View Citation

Galiè N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, Torbicki A, Vachiery JL, Barbera JA, Beghetti M, Corris P, Gaine S, Gibbs JS, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jondeau G, Klepetko W, Opitz C, Peacock A, Rubin L, Zellweger M, Simonneau G; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J. 2009 Oct;30(20):2493-537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp297. Epub 2009 Aug 27. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr;32(8):926. — View Citation

Humbert M, Sitbon O, Simonneau G. Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1425-36. Review. — View Citation

Paul GA, Gibbs JS, Boobis AR, Abbas A, Wilkins MR. Bosentan decreases the plasma concentration of sildenafil when coprescribed in pulmonary hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;60(1):107-12. — View Citation

Voelkel NF, Gomez-Arroyo J, Abbate A, Bogaard HJ, Nicolls MR. Pathobiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension and right ventricular failure. Eur Respir J. 2012 Dec;40(6):1555-65. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00046612. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Review. — View Citation

Weiss J, Theile D, Rüppell MA, Speck T, Spalwisz A, Haefeli WE. Interaction profile of macitentan, a new non-selective endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013 Feb 15;701(1-3):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Jan 23. — View Citation

Weiss J, Theile D, Spalwisz A, Burhenne J, Riedel KD, Haefeli WE. Influence of sildenafil and tadalafil on the enzyme- and transporter-inducing effects of bosentan and ambrisentan in LS180 cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013 Jan 15;85(2):265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Dec 5. — View Citation

Wrishko RE, Dingemanse J, Yu A, Darstein C, Phillips DL, Mitchell MI. Pharmacokinetic interaction between tadalafil and bosentan in healthy male subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 May;48(5):610-8. doi: 10.1177/0091270008315315. Epub 2008 Feb 27. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Characterisation of Medication Levels	comparison of different combination treatment arms (mean ± standard deviation), measurement of endothelin receptor antagonist plasma concentrations and PDE-5I plasma concentrations, results given es multiple of the expected mean plasma concentration (MOM). Due to technical setup measurement of plasma concentrations of macitentan was not possible.; The expected mean concentration ranges (MOM) refer to data extracted from published plasma concentration-time profiles measured during monotherapy with sildenafil, tadalafil, bosentan, and ambrisentan and served as comparative values. Each individually measured drug concentration was set in proportion to the expected mean concentration and expressed as a multiple of the expected mean (MoM), with values <1 denoting lower and values >1 higher values than the expected mean.	baseline vs. measurement after 3-6 months
Secondary	Impact of Medication Adjustment	Change of medication serum levels after clinically indicated medication adaptation in patients who received Bosentan + Sildenafil in the beginning and changed the ERA to Macitentan; change of mean levels ± standard deviation; frequency of borderline medication serum levels or medication levels out of the therapeutic window The expected mean concentration ranges (MOM) refer to data extracted from published plasma concentration-time profiles measured during monotherapy with sildenafil, tadalafil, bosentan, and ambrisentan and served as comparative values. Each individually measured drug concentration was set in proportion to the expected mean concentration and expressed as a multiple of the expected mean (MoM), with values <1 denoting lower and values >1 higher values than the expected mean.	baseline vs. measurement 3-6 months after switch
Secondary	Clinical Relevance 6 Minute Walking Distance	Changes of medication levels after adjustment of combination therapy if clinically indicated; correlation with clinical routine parameters indicating clinical disease status	baseline vs. measurement 3-6 months after switch
Secondary	Clinical Relevance NTproBNP	Changes of medication levels after adjustment of combination therapy if clinically indicated; correlation with clinical routine parameters indicating clinical disease status	baseline vs. measurement after 3-6 months
Secondary	Clinical Relevance Echocardiography Systolic Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (sPAP)	Changes of medication levels after adjustment of combination therapy if clinically indicated; correlation with clinical routine parameters indicating clinical disease status	baseline vs. measurement after 3-6 months
Secondary	Clinical Relevance Echocardiography Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE)	Changes of medication levels after adjustment of combination therapy if clinically indicated; correlation with clinical routine parameters indicating clinical disease status	baseline vs. measurement after 3-6 months
Secondary	Clinical Relevance Blood Gas Analysis Oxygen Saturation	Changes of medication levels after adjustment of combination therapy if clinically indicated; correlation with clinical routine parameters indicating clinical disease status	baseline vs. measurement after 3-6 months

External Links

•   First-Line Combination of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil Reduces Risk of Clinical Failure Compared to Monotherapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Outcomes Study. Gilead Sciences Inc., 2014. (Accessed 2014-10-13, 2014