View clinical trials related to Public Health.
Filter by:There is a lot of discussion concerning the normal cut-off points of skeletal mass among different populations worldwide. Genetic and environmental differences most probably lead to different measurements. Defining muscle mass in healthy young adults in Greece will provide information that can be used to determine normal ranges of muscle mass of both sexes and consequently define sarcopenia. The aim of the study is to define appendicular skeletal muscle mass reference measurements in healthy young adults in Greece. These values can be used to determine sarcopenia cut-offs according to recommendations.
The impact of living in a deprived area has far reaching consequences on maternal and infant health. Studies in England show women living in deprived areas have some of the poorest experiences of care, poor birth outcomes and are 50% more likely to die of pregnancy related complications than women in the least deprived neighbourhoods. Life expectancy has also stalled for women living in the most deprived areas and the global COVID-19 pandemic has further amplified existing health inequalities. The Social Determinants of Health (SDH) are the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age, and are mostly responsible for health inequities - the unfair and avoidable differences in health seen within and between populations. Evidence shows taking action on the SDH alongside Midwifery Continuity of Care (MCC) models, improves birth outcomes and reduces health inequalities. How midwives working in MCC models in areas of high deprivation address the SDH as part of their public health and prevention role is currently not clear. There is also a lack of qualitative evidence exploring the SDH from the perspectives of women themselves. Drawing on Constructivist Grounded Theory methods, this research will take place in a low-income setting in England. Through the use of semi-structured interviews with women and midwives working in an NHS MCC model, the study will generate theory to help explain how and indeed whether midwives take action to address the SDH as part of their public health role. The study also seeks to understand the SDH impacting upon women's lives and what mechanisms exist to support or obstruct engagement with the SDH. Examining these domains will contribute to the evidence base about the impact of MCC and the public health and prevention strategy in NHS maternity services.
Effective communication is a critical component of managing pandemic outbreaks like COVID-19. This study explores COVID-19 related public knowledge, perceptions, belief in public health recommendations, intent to comply with public health recommendations, trust in information sources and preferred information sources. Participants are invited to include detailed free-text answers to make sure their COVID-19 experiences are heard.
Introduction: A baseline assessment of surgical capacity is recommended as a first-step to inform national policy on surgical system strengthening. In Ethiopia, the World Health Organization's Situational Analysis Tool (WHO SAT) was adapted to assess surgical capacity as part of a national initiative: Saving Lives Through Safe Surgery (SaLTS). This study describes the process of adapting this tool and initial results. Methods: The new tool was used to evaluate fourteen hospitals in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People's Region of Ethiopia between February and March 2017. Two analytic methods were employed. To compare this data to international metrics, the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) framework was used. To assess congruence with national policy, data was evaluated against Ethiopian SaLTS targets.
The investigators performed a randomised controlled trial with 202 healthy university students in the Oslo area, with 50:50 in a yoga intervention group and a waitlist control group. Measures included symptoms of depression and anxiety, sleep problems, heart rate variability (HRV), well-being and mindfulness at week 0 (baseline), week 12 (post-intervention) and week 24 (follow-up).
Successful treatment of hepatitis C has been reported to be associated with 62-84% reduction in all-cause mortality (deaths), 68-79% reduction in risk of HCC and 90% reduction in risk of liver transplantation. The efficacy of NS5A inhibitors for the treatment of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be affected by the presence of NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). Pre-existence of resistance associated substitutions (RASs) to direct antiviral agents (DAAs) reduces sustained virologic response (SVR) rates by 3-53% in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 infected patients depending on different predictors and the DAA regimen used. This study will prospectively analyze data from the MukhMantri Punjab Hepatitis C Relief Fund (MMPHCRF) to determine the posttreatment prevalence of various NS5A RASs, and their effect on outcomes of treatment with daclatasvir-sofosbuvir or sofosbuvir-ledipasvirin patients with chronic HCV. The study aims to assess the prevalence and effect of RASs on sustained virological response (SVR) rates in patients with treatment failure to a regimen containing sofosbuvir and ledipasvir/daclatasvir.
The investigators need stronger feedback loops and a quality monitoring and management system to improve the quality of care in sustainable way. The Chair Sint-Trudo "To a sustainable quality policy" was established to scientifically develop prerequisites for a sustainable quality of care. In this study protocol, a monocentric mixed-method quasi-experimental study will be used to assess the impact of a rapid-cycle quality indicator feedback mechanism on both patients and professionals.
The main goals of this project are to support the research training of undergraduate medical students at the University de Sherbrooke and promote planning of health services a better knowledge of the prevalence, social, and geographic distribution of public health issues in several regions in Quebec. To meet the objectives of the project, a population-based prospective study linked to several regions in Quebec public health surveys is proposed. Monitoring and data collection will be provided by 3rd year undergraduate medical students at University de Sherbrooke through telephone interviews. The research themes will be proposed by various researchers affiliated with the University de Sherbrooke. They will be selected yearly by an internal scientific committee and included in the questionnaires administered by the students.
Illegal gold miners in French Guiana, a French overseas territory ('département') located in Amazonia, often carry malaria parasites (up to 46.8%). While the Guiana Shield Region aims at malaria elimination, the high prevalence of Plasmodiumin this hard-to-reach population in conjunction with frequent incorrect use of artemisinin-based anti-malarials could favor the emergence of resistant parasites. Due to geographical and regulatory issues in French Guiana, usual malaria control strategies cannot be implemented in this particular context.Therefore, new strategies targeting this specific population in the forest are required. Numerous discussions among health institutions and scientific partners from French Guiana, Brazil and Suriname have led to an innovative project based on the distribution of kits for self-diagnosis and self-treatment of Plasmodium infections. The kit-distribution will be implemented at "resting sites", which are areas across the border of French Guiana regularly frequented by gold miners. The main objective is to increase the appropriate use and complete malaria treatment after a positive malaria diagnosis with a rapid test, which will be evaluated with before-and-after cross-sectional studies. Monitoring indicators will be collected from health mediators at the time of kit distribution and during subsequent visits, and from illegal gold miners themselves, through a smartphone application. The project funding is multisource, including Ministries of Health of the three countries, WHO/PAHO, and the European Union.
Financials constraints of health systems require suitable indices and criteria to better allocate resources in order to enhance and maximize social welfare. Among multiple methods, the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is used as a validated and preference-base measure for health care procedures in health economics studies such as cost-utility analyses. In France, the methodological guide of the public agency of the High Authority for Health (HAS) recommends the valuation of health states with the use of a generic and descriptive instrument (EQ5D), validated by the Time Trade Off method (TTO) in samples from general French population. Although it appears to be legitimate to distribute collective resources based on general population preferences, a major concern is that individuals do not face a real choice that can have a direct implication on their welfare and their life. The existence of a discrepancy between revealed "hypothetical" preferences and real preferences would raise the problem concerning production of the currently available standards and norms. Hence, a methodological deepening of these preferences revelation process is necessary. Virtual reality (VR) could play a key role in resolving this methodological problem. Widely used in the field of health (such as therapy, medical training...), VR is a simulation that seeks to approach the reality, without trying to be quite like it. It aims one or more individuals to explore a sensorimotor and cognitive activity in an artificial world in 3D, which can be "imaginary, symbolic or a simulation of some aspects of the real world" (Fuchs, 2006). VR could be well applied to the field of health economics by offering hypothetical scenarios of the different health states from the EQ5D that individuals might experience in the first person. To date, existence of this discrepancy between revealed "hypothetical" preferences and actual preferences of individuals from the general population is extremely difficult to explore. However, this is an important methodological challenge in the revelation of preferences to guide health-related decisions. Indeed, comparing the revealed preferences about health states established from a first person experience in VR to the revealed preferences established from the classic narrative approach without VR, may provide an accurate approach of actual and real preferences of individuals from the general population. Moreover, another advantage of VR is to permit the assessment of a greater number of health states, this method being faster processed than the narrative approach: individuals are experimenting immediate experience of a situation when under VR. Thus, VR method may overcome technical constraints of the classic narrative approach concerning limited sample sizes in norms production. To the investigators knowledge, VR has never been proposed for valuating health conditions. This study would report the relevance and interest in using VR (immersive and immediate life situation experience) for the production of utility EQ5D health states values in the general population by the revelation of preferences method called the Time Trade Off (TTO), the currently approach recommended by the HAS. Using VR could circumvent some limitations of the current narrative approach: it would provide a better feasibility and acceptability among subjects, fewer inconsistencies, an easier and wider access to disadvantaged individuals. Eventually revisions of available standards could be proposed to allow the HAS and policy makers to base their choices on more reliable, standardized and accurate classifications of health states conditions, that associate each health state to a predefined value.