View clinical trials related to Psoriasis.
Filter by:The purpose of the VIP-A study is to determine the effect of apremilast on aortic vascular inflammation, cardiometabolic biomarkers and body composition in patients with moderate-severe psoriasis.
Patients receiving biologic therapy with 5% or less body surface area will receive Enstilar topical foam for 16 weeks.
Infliximab and other TNF-inhibitors have revolutionised the treatment of several immunological inflammatory diseases. Still, more than half of the patients either do not respond sufficiently to infliximab therapy or loose efficacy over time. The large individual variation in the serum drug concentrations on standard doses and the development of anti-drug antibodies are thought to be main reasons for these treatment failures. An individualised treatment strategy based on systematic assessments of serum drug concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring, has been proposed as a clinical tool to optimise efficacy of infliximab treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring seems reasonable both from a clinical and an economical point of view, but the effectiveness of this treatment strategy still remain to be shown. The NOR-DRUM study is planned as a national, randomised controlled multicentre trial in two parts aiming to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring in order to achieve remission in patients with immunological inflammatory diseases starting infliximab treatment (part A) and in order to maintain disease control in patients on maintenance infliximab treatment (part B). The results of the NOR-DRUM study will hopefully contribute to an implementation of a personalised medicine approach to treatment with infliximab and other biological drugs.
The purpose of the study is to research how much ixekizumab enters the bloodstream and how long the body takes to get rid of the drug and the safety of ixekizumab and any side effects that might be associated with it. The study has two parts: A single-dose part and multiple-dose part. The single dose part of this study will last up to 24 weeks, including the screening period. The multiple dose part of this study will last up to 32 weeks including the screening period.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ixekizumab in pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
Psoriasis, the most prevalent autoimmune disease in the U.S., manifests with plaque type psoriasis vulgaris with lesions localized to the scalp, postauricular region, face, diaper area, elbows, and knees. Inadequately controlled disease is common and a significant cause of extensive psychological and clinical morbidity in children. In addition, the safety and tolerability issues of common treatments for psoriasis including topical corticosteroids, calcipotriol, oral cytotoxic drugs, and biologic agents are especially problematic in patients that limit their use. Identification of therapies with high efficacy and safety profiles suitable for patients with psoriasis is therefore an area of critical unmet need. Haus Bioceuticals has developed a topical treatment for psoriasis denoted HAT1 (based on ingredients that have established clinical benefit), and further have demonstrated that HAT1 is safe and profoundly effective in the treatment of psoriasis. This study is aimed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAT1 compared to commonly used calcipotriol in patients with mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis.
The purpose of this study was to determine if secukinumab is effective and safe in the treatment of plaque type psoriasis
This Phase 2 study (Study 203) has been designed to determine and compare the efficacy and safety of 188-0551 Solution and Vehicle Solution applied twice daily for up to four weeks in subjects with plaque psoriasis. Subjects will be instructed to apply the test article (188-0551 Solution or Vehicle Solution) to all psoriasis plaques within the designated Treatment Area twice daily for four weeks (Study Day 29), unless the investigator verifies the subject's psoriasis has cleared at Day 15, then test article application will be for 2 weeks (Study Day 15).
This study consists of three parts: single oral dose escalation in healthy volunteers (Part A), and multiple oral dose escalations in healthy volunteers (Part B) and in participants with chronic plaque psoriasis (Part C)
For patients with moderate plaque psoriasis who are intolerable to, have a contraindication to or have failed classical systemic treatments, the current commonly employed management strategy encompasses treatment with biologic agents. The direct and indirect costs of biologic treatment, accruing, among others, from the high drug acquisition and administration costs, the required baseline safety screening and subsequent routine monitoring as well as the potential loss of patients' working hours constitute a significant financial burden on the public healthcare system. In light of the above evidence, it appears that in routine care apremilast may fulfill an important gap in the treatment armamentarium of psoriasis by providing a promising treatment option to be employed prior to biologics, which has demonstrated efficacy even in hard-to-treat areas such as the scalp, nails, palms and soles, and has a limited manageable safety profile, while being more convenient and cost-effective than biologics. In view of the scarcity of real-world evidence regarding the impact of apremilast on the patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and extent and severity of the disease, and under the consideration that the moderate psoriasis patient {defined as [10<body surface area (BSA)<20 or 10<psoriasis area severity index (PASI)<20] and 10<dermatology quality of life index (DLQI)<20}, naïve to biologic treatment was likely underrepresented in the pivotal ESTEEM trials since approximately 30% of the enrolled patients had been previously treated with biologic therapy, 28-30% had a baseline PASI score >20, and 48-52% had a BSA >20%, this study represents an attempt to examine the impact of apremilast in routine clinical practice settings in Greece on the patient with moderate plaque psoriasis when this therapeutic strategy precedes biologics in the treatment algorithm. Specifically, the present study aims to generate novel real-world evidence on the effect of apremilast treatment in biologic treatment naïve patients with moderate plaque psoriasis in terms of the patients' HRQoL, patient-perceived benefits of therapy, treatment response rate, and impact on nail, scalp and palmoplantar psoriatic involvement and severity of pruritus, while concurrently assessing apremilast survival rate and cost per PASI-75 responder in the routine clinical practice of Greece.