View clinical trials related to Psoriasis.
Filter by:We will recruit 300 patients with psoriasis from Yueyang Hospital of Integrative Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, who will not be currently diagnosed with diabetes but will have been identified as high-risk individuals based on the developed risk assessment model. Based on doctor's treatment opinions and patient preferences, participants will be divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: a Western medicine group and a TCM comprehensive treatment group. Patients in the Western medicine group will receive treatment according to guidelines. Patients in the TCM comprehensive treatment group will be treated according to the guidelines and will additionally receive Taodan granules (to be taken daily during the treatment period after brewing the granules with lukewarm water in the morning and evening) and fish oil (1g, taken orally twice daily). Patients in the TCM comprehensive treatment group will be required to complete at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per week under the supervision of a physician. The patients will be treated for 16 weeks and followed up for 24 weeks to see if the treatment prevents the development of diabetes or insulin resistance.
In this study, participants will have 3 or 4 total study visits over approximately 10 total weeks. There is a two week medication washout period in between the 1st and 2nd visits. This washout only applies if participants are using a prohibited psoriasis medication (such as topical steroids or oral psoriasis medications, like methotrexate). During the washout period, participants will have to stop the prohibited medication(s). If participants are not using any prohibited medications, then the 1st and 2nd visits can be combined and participants will only have 3 total in-person visits. Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance; like flipping a coin) to either the Mediterranean Diet or no dietary intervention. After 4 weeks on the diet, participants will start treatment with either Anti-IL-17 or Anti-IL-23 therapy. The biologic treatments will prescribed by the participants regular dermatologist and not as a part of the study.
The goal of this trial is to assess whether the efficacy of CMAB015 is similar to that of Secukinumab in patients with moderate-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. It will also learn about the similarity of CMAB015 and Secukinumab in terms of safety and immunogenicity in patients with moderate-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The main question it aims to answer is: In subjects with moderate to severe plate psoriasis treated with CMAB015, Is the proportion of patients achieving a 75% improvement in PASI (Psoriasis area and severity index) scores relative to baseline (PASI 75) the same as those treated with Secukinumab? Participants will: Receive treatment with 300 mg CMAB015 or Secukinumab by subcutaneous injection at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8, followed by every 4 weeks until week 48. Visit the clinic at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8, followed by every 4 weeks until week 52. Be evaluated with PASI scores, body surface area (BSA) scores and investigator's global assessment (IGA) (mod 2011) scores.
Biologics are effective agents for the treatment of psoriasis. The newest generation of biologics block interleukin 17 and 23. Physicians always prescribe these drugs in a fixed dose, but this may lead to under- and overdosing in some patients. Underdosing may lead to inadequate response or loss of response over time. Overdosage, on the other hand, can lead to higher risk of side effects and higher costs for the healthcare system. In daily clinical practice, physicians often tackle this real-world issue by blind trial- and- error dose modifications or switching to another biologic. In this study, we want to rationalize these dose modifications and optimize dosing based on the drug concentrations, measured in the blood of the patient (i.e. therapeutic drug monitoring). Depending on the drug concentration, the interval between injections will be lengthened or shortened with the aim to reach the required drug concentration to reach the best clinical result. The trial will be conducted in 14 Belgian hospitals where patients will be divided into 2 study groups: a group that will be advised on the dosing scheme of their biologic based on the measured drug concentration and a group that continues dosing as in daily clinical practice. We will monitor if the clinical response and quality of life remains stable. With this study, we will track drug concentrations as we believe that they can guide dosing of biologics and we hope to achieve better safety, lower healthcare expenses and higher patients' treatment satisfaction while striving for the best clinical response.
Background: Psoriasis is one of the hot spots in the field of skin disease prevention and treatment, and TCM topical preparations have unique advantages in the treatment of psoriasis. The Qinteng Huoxue prescription series of TCM topical preparations created by Professor Sun Liyun have been observed to be effective in clinical practice in the treatment of psoriasis, but there is no multi-center clinical trial for blood stasis syndrome. In addition, the TCM topical preparations has the disadvantages of large particle diameter and unfavorable penetration of skin barrier. Objective: In this study, chitosan nanocrystalline drug delivery system was used to prepare Chitosan Nanocrystalline Qinteng Huoxue Runji Ointment, and the efficacy and safety of Chitosan Nanocrystalline Qinteng Huoxue Runji Ointment in the intervention of psoriasis with blood stasis syndrome was investigated through multi-center, randomized, double-blind, self-controlled bilateral skin lesions and placebo-controlled clinical trials. Methods: A total of 96 patients with plaque psoriasis with blood stasis syndrome of were enrolled in 4 research centers, and bilateral symmetrical rashes on limbs or trunk were selected, and randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group received topical Chitosan Nanocrystalline Qinteng Huoxue Runji Ointment, twice a day for 12 weeks, and the control group received topical placebo twice a day for 12 weeks, and two follow-up visits were performed at the 16th and 20th week. Results Indicators: The main efficacy indicators were targeted psoriasis area and severity index (tPASI), and the secondary efficacy indicators included: Psoriasis physician global assessment (PGA), target lesion area, numerical rating scale (NRS), TCM syndrome score, dermatology life quality index (DLQI), MOS 36 item short from health survey (SF-36)), and the morphology and number of vascular globules under dermoscopy. tPASI, PGA, target lesion area, NRS were assessed at baseline, at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 weeks of treatment, and at 16 and 20 weeks of follow-up. TCM syndrome score, DLQI, SF-36, and dermoscopy were assessed at baseline, 12 and 20 weeks. Safety assessment includes vital signs monitoring, blood routine, urine routine, liver and kidney function tests, and adverse events and adverse reactions. SPSS 20.0 was used for data analysis.
The investigators aim to compare the efficacy and safety of secukinumab and ustekinumab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), and to explore the impact of genetic mutation types on clinical efficacy. The main questions the study aims to answer are: Is there a difference in the effectiveness of secukinumab and ustekinumab in the treatment of GPP? How is the safety of secukinumab and ustekinumab in the treatment of GPP? Does the type of genetic mutation in GPP patients affect the efficacy of secukinumab and ustekinumab? The investigators will compare patients treated with secukinumab to those treated with ustekinumab to see the difference in the effectiveness of the two drugs in treating GPP. Participants will: The investigators conducted a 48-week follow-up study on 65 participants who were admitted to the dermatology department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University for GPP from July 2019 to December 2022. All participants underwent saliva-based genetic testing. Efficacy analyses were performed based on the scores of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) and Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) at week 0, 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48. Participants were also asked to report all adverse events (AEs) during follow-up.
This is a prospective, observational, real-world study of adult participants in Japan with physician-reported diagnosis of plaque psoriasis treated with deucravacitinib or apremilast.
The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of adding two questions and pictures to the validated PEST on the potential diagnosis of PsA in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO in Canada. Patients will be enrolled in the study for up to 66 days and will be asked to fill-out a PsA screening questionnaire at their first dermatologist visit. Patients screening positive for PsA will have a second visit with a rheumatologist where a full PsA diagnosis assessment will be performed. A remote 'end of study' (EOS) visit will be conducted by the dermatologist to document the patient's biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) treatment choice and status.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter, Dose-Ranging, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of ZL-1102 Topical gel (A Human VH IL-17A Antibody Fragment) in the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of Hemay005 tablets in subjects with mild to moderate renal impairment and normal renal function, and to provide a basis for the formulation of clinical medication regimens for patients with renal impairment.