View clinical trials related to Presbyopia.
Filter by:This is a Phase IIa study to assess efficacy and safety of STN1013600 ophthalmic solution (0.1%, and 0.3 %), twice daily when compared to Placebo in subjects diagnosed with presbyopia. This study will consist of a Screening Period of up to 15 days followed by a 2 Month Treatment Period. After the Treatment Period subjects will be followed for a one-month treatment free period.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the product performance of a new silicone hydrogel daily disposable multifocal contact lens, the Bausch + Lomb (kalifilcon A) Daily Disposable Multifocal Contact Lens, when worn by current soft contact lens wearers on a daily disposable wear basis
Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LNZ101 for the treatment of Presbyopia.
The objectives of this study are: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Nyxol alone and with adjunctive low dose pilocarpine to improve distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) in subjects with presbyopia.
Current visual outcomes expectations of cataract patients are similar to those of refractive surgery patients. Their desire is to be spectacle independent for far, intermediate and near vision activities. Some may have already enjoyed freedom from glasses and would like to continue after the cataracts are removed. Different options are available. These options include: mono-vision and presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses (IOL). Presbyopia correcting IOLs include accommodative, multifocals and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. In a previous study that evaluated the visual outcomes of an EDOF IOL when combined with a multifocal IOL with a +3.25 D add in patients with or without astigmatism undergoing routine cataract surgery showed good outcomes with high patient satisfaction and less dependance on glasses for intermediate and near activities. As technology evolves, new lens models are available in the market. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the latest EDOF and a hybrid multifocal lenses when combined.
The objective of the study was to adapt existing multifocal soft lens wearers to a Control Lens for at least 2 weeks and then evaluate the success of switching them to the Test Lens, with a review after 2 weeks.
Primary objective of this study is to compare two presbyopia correction surgical techniques, specificaly premium monovision, in which the dominant eye is corrected with an extended depth of field intraocular lens and the non-dominant eye with a trifocal diffractive intraocular lens, and the bilateral implantation of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses.
Current visual outcomes expectations of cataract patients are similar to those of refractive surgery patients. Their desire is to be spectacle independent for far, intermediate and near vision activities. Different options are available including: mono-vision and presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses (IOL). Presbyopia correcting IOLs include accommodative, multifocal, trifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. The Vivity Extended Vision IOL is not a multifocal IOL but due to its design, it provides better intermediate and near VA compared to a monofocal IOL.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the patient subjective experiences of the monthly multifocal lens when compared to the daily disposable multifocal lens after 15 minutes of daily wear.
This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with implantation of a trifocal IOL. Only one eye of each patient was enrolled. Eyes were devided into three groups according the axial length (AL), including the short AL group, the control group and the long AL group. Manifest refraction, uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuity at different distances, contrast sensitivity, aberrations and IOL decentration were measured three months after surgery. Spectacle independence, adverse photic phenomena, overall satisfaction and life quality were assessed with a questionnaire.