Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04581616 |
Other study ID # |
202008040RINC |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 16, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
October 16, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2020 |
Source |
National Taiwan University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study aims to compare the effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and
interthoracic intercostal nerve block in thoracic surgery. Interthoracic intercostal nerve
block is a routine procedure during the surgery by the surgeon in our hospital, and
ultrasound-guide erector spinae plane block is a relative new developed regional analgesia
technique introduced since 2016 and mainly done by anesthesiologists. Both technique provide
analgesic effect to some extent and reduce opiate consumption and side effects. However, no
previous literature or research compare the effect of these two technique in thoracic
surgery. The primary endpoint of our study is compare morphine consumption and pain score
between patients undergo ESP block and patients undergo ICNB after thoracic surgery; the
second endpoint is to compare the recovery condition evaluated by QoR-15 questionaire 24
hours after surgery.
Description:
Sample size estimation is based on our APS team data, in which the average cumulative
morphine consumption in patients underwent VATS surgery with ICNB was calculated. The mean
cumulative morphine consumption was 15±8 mg of patients underwent VATS with ICNB. We assume
the difference between ICNB and ESPB group reach 5 mg and aim for a power of 95 % and a risk
of 0.05 for a type-1 error, at least 42 for each group needing to be recruited. 50 patients
for each group, total 100 patients will be collected to avoid dropouts. Patient will be
allocated to one of the trial groups using a computer-generated random number table once the
consent was approved. First group is ICNB group and the second group is ESPB group.
The general anesthesia agents, induction process and routine care are the same for both
groups. Once aforementioned routine cares are done, the patient will be turn into lateral
decubitus position. Echo-guided ESP block will be performed after patients are turned into
lateral decubitus position in ESP group; on the other side, local anesthetics will be
injected at incision site and intrathoracic intercostal nerve block will be performed in ICNB
group right after the surgeon makes the incision site and get into chest cavity.
Pain score (VAS) and cumulative morphine consumption will be recorded in PACU, postoperative
24H, 48H, and before discharge. Recovery condition will be evaluated via QoR-15 questionnaire
in postoperative 24H, furthermore, we will follow up the patient's pain and recovery status 3
months after the operation. After collecting above data, the effect of ESP group and ICNB
group on acute pain relieve, chronic pain control and recovery enhancement will be evaluated.