View clinical trials related to Postoperative Complications.
Filter by:Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery with incidences ranging from 20% to 40% with the consequence of increasing mortality, morbidity, and hospital length of stay, as well as increasing the costs to the health care system. To prevent POAF the use of beta-blockers is suggested by the EACTA and ESC guidelines. Despite the prophylactic use, the discontinuation of beta-blockers in the perioperative period is a known risk factor that contributes to the occurrence of POAF. Due to the short half time and the highly beta-1-selective properties of Landiolol, it could be possible to initiate a betablocker for prevention in the immediate postoperative setting, without adverse effects like hypotension or severe bradycardia as seen with other betablockers like Metoprolol or even sometimes Esmolol. Landiolol is already approved for the treatment of atrial tachycardias but is not yet approved for the use of prevention of POAF. In multiple previous studies the preventive potential of Landiolol in cardiac surgery could be proven in japanese study populations, with limitations due to limited sample sizes. In these trials the use of low-dose Landiolol effectively reduced the incidence of POAF without significant differences of increased side effects or in the hemodynamic stability compared to the placebo or standard of care groups. The primary objective of this prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial is to prove that the postoperative application of low-dose Landiolol significantly reduces the incidence of POAF without increased adverse events or hemodynamic instability compared to the placebo group after cardiac surgery in a non-Asian population.
Avoidance of unnecessary blood transfusions has always been a focus of clinical research. The rate of perioperative red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass reaches between 50-70%, and the intraoperative red blood cell transfusion rate is 30-50%. Regarding whether and when to perform a blood transfusion, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the benefits and risks brought by blood transfusion. Previous studies on blood transfusion strategies have mainly focused on the hemoglobin threshold, but the hemoglobin level does not fully reflect the level of tissue oxygenation. Mixed venous blood oxygen saturation has been widely studied as a valuable indicator reflecting the balance of oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption. But due to the difficulty of placing a pulmonary artery floating catheter for monitoring, its clinical application is limited. Central venous oxygen saturation requires only a small collection of blood samples, which can reflect the oxygen saturation of the superior vena cava, and studies have shown that it can effectively guide the blood transfusion of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Existing studies have shown that in critically ill patients, the use of arterial-venous oxygen difference > 3.7 mL as an indicator to guide blood transfusion can lead to a higher 90-day survival rate. However, the relationship between the arterial-venous oxygen difference and the incidence of adverse events in cardiac surgery patients under CPB remains unclear. Whether increasing the arterial-venous oxygen difference during surgery can reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events remains to be clarified. This study intends to collect intraoperative arterial blood and central venous blood samples from cardiac surgery patients undergoing CPB, and analyze the relationship between arterial-venous oxygen difference and the incidence of postoperative adverse events.
The optimalisation of the health status of patients scheduled for major surgery has been considered to be the most important point of perioperative care, and nutritional intervention has been perceived a key point of that intervention. Immunomodulating diets were thought to reduce cmplications, hoever recent studies put that opnion in doubt. This study was designed to assess the actual clinical significance of oral immunonutrition.
Patients after the surgical removal of axillary lymphnodes suffers from prolonged fluid collections. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of oral immunonutrition and high-protein diets on the reduction of fluid collection.
Access to safe surgery is a basic human right. This is highlighted by the work of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. There is a large burden of surgical disease in the paediatric surgical population with a large unmet need. In Africa, children comprise a significant proportion of the population with approximately 50% of the population being ≤19 years old. Limited data from Africa suggests the risk factors for, incidence and outcomes associated with paediatric surgical complications differ from HICs. The African Surgical Outcomes Study (ASOS) has described surgical outcomes in adult patients in Africa. There is a need to determine the burden of the complications in paediatric surgical patients in Africa, and the risk factors for and the type of complications experienced. Once this study is completed, the investigators will be able to target appropriate interventions to improve surgical outcomes for children in Africa. The investigators have the capacity to do this important work, through the African Perioperative Research Group (APORG) group.
The infectious coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), caused by corona virus SARS-severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused significant disruption in surgical services to patients globally. Data from the COVIDSurg Cohort Study suggest mortality rates of patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in the peri-operative period of up to 25.6% in emergency surgery and 18.9% in elective surgery. Based on estimates by the COVIDSurg Collaborative, large numbers of elective surgical procedures are cancelled. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced healthcare providers to 'shift from patient-centred ethics to public health ethics'. This has had impact on pre-operative testing for COVID-19, and scheduling of surgery. Currently, a provisional recommendation to delay surgery for at least four weeks after a positive COVID test, exists. Weighing the risk of surgery and potential complications during the COVID-19 pandemic, against the benefit of undergoing a surgical procedure to improve quality of life, remains difficult. A study to determine the long term effect of the pandemic on patient-reported outcome may provide guidance on how to safely return to surgical activity that are again more focused on individualized care. There is also the opportunity to record outcomes that are currently accepted as the standard for understanding longer term recovery after surgery.
Patients suffering from pancreas cancer as well as patients with chronic pancreatitis or requiring pancreas surgery often are in a compromised nutritional status. Nutritional support should therefore be started early during the postoperative course to prevent further malnutrition, as it is an important risk factor to develop complications. Recently, several studies have shown that early enteral nutrition (EEN) could shorten length of stay, reduce postoperative infections and mortality, and decrease costs when compared with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in gastrointestinal cancer surgery. After pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), EEN has been shown to reduce early and late complications, infections, and readmission rates. It is nevertheless currently not clear if EEN improves the short-term outcomes after PD compared to oral nutrition. The primary objective of the study is to assess the impact of EEN on postoperative morbidity after PD, according to the Comprehensive Complication Index. Secondary objectives are to assess the impact of EEN on major postoperative complications, according to Clavien classification, specific complications, length of stay, readmission rates, quality of life, metabolic stress and nutritional response after PD.
Surgical removal of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth is a frequent intervention, usually accompanied by unpleasant sequelae (pain, swelling and trismus) in the postoperative period, sometimes even with possibly serious complications (dry socket/alveolar osteitis and postoperative infection at the surgical site - SSI). It is therefore advisable to use various medications and procedures to prevent or alleviate the occurrence of these sequelae and complications. Accordingly, there is a debate in the literature on the expedience of perioperative (prophylactic) use of antibiotics. It is interesting that numerous articles recommending perioperative (prophylactic) antibiotic use to patients undergoing the impacted mandibular third molar surgery may be found, as well as those providing arguments for the disagreement with such an approach, considering that its benefits do not outweigh the risks of adverse side effects, especially due to growing resistance of microorganisms towards antibiotics, which is a possible serious threat to global health. Concerning the perioperative (prophylactic) use of antibiotics for this indication, consensus has not yet been reached, and neither of the views has been verified by convincing scientific evidence. Having the aforementioned dilemma in mind, the main endpoint of the study was to determine the validity of perioperative (prophylactic) use of antibiotics as to alleviate customary sequelae and possible complications after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars and, at the same time, the effectiveness of newer antibiotics (moxifloxacin and cefixime) when used for this purpose. Moreover, microbiological investigations of susceptibility of the isolated microorganisms to antibiotics used in this research were performed, which could verify the clinically obtained results. With this in mind, two major contributions, based on scientifically verified results, could be expected from the research: (1) confirmation or refuting the validity of perioperative (prophylactic) antibiotic use to control sequelae or complications that could follow the impacted mandibular third molar surgery; and (2) confirmation of the efficacy of fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin) and cephalosporins (cefixime) in controlling odontogenic infections.
Studying the effects of both inhalational anesthetics desflurane and sevoflurane on hepatic integrity and renal function, guided by recent blood and urine biomarkers in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.
Major spinal surgery causes greater pain in the postoperative 24 hours. Patients with severe pain may have prolonged hospital stays and delay in mobilization. In addition, chronic pain may be seen in these patients due to ineffectively managed acute postoperative pain. Therefore, optimizing acute postoperative analgesia is a priority in patients undergoing major spinal surgery. Recently, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks such as thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB)and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) have been described in spinal surgery. Both blocks clinically seem to be safe and easily performed. The aims of this study are to compare the quality of recovery scores, overall morbidity and postoperative analgesia after major spinal surgery in patients receiving either TLIPB or ESPB.