View clinical trials related to Postoperative Complications.
Filter by:The investigators compared between dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine when added to levobupivacaine in the quality and duration of ultrasound-guided interscalene block during shoulder arthroscopy.
The investigators propose a pilot clinical trial on the use of perioperative pregabalin in order to decrease ureteral stent related symptoms and decrease opioid usage after ureteroscopy with stent placement. Patients undergoing ureteroscopy with stent placement will receive a single dose of 300 mg pregabalin PO in the preoperative area. This work will assess safety and feasibility of studying this regimen at our institution, with the aim of performing a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study in the future.
Infection and wound complications are the most common complications following orthopaedic foot and ankle procedures, and the infection rate following these procedures is higher than in procedures involving other areas of the body.The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether a standard chlorhexidine prep can be augmented with a soak & scrub of the foot in dilute betadine to reduce the rate of positive cultures from the hallux nail fold prior to surgery.
Medical errors account for thousands of potentially preventable deaths each year. With the annual increase of surgical cases there is a need for research into the potential utility of a telemedicine-based control center for the operating room to assess risk, diagnose negative patient trajectories, implement evidence-based practices, and improve outcomes.
In an estimated 150,000 patients, a knee joint replacement is performed in Germany every year. The perioperative care of the patients aims at an optimal surgical technique, which leads to a high functionality in the joint, and above all at an adequate pain treatment. Patients experience pain especially intraoperatively and in the first days after the operation. The intensity of pain is a decisive factor that can hinder the patient's mobilization. In the KneeOptOut study (ethics application number EA4/009/17), which has already been successfully carried out and approved by this ethics committee, it was shown that the use of local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) for pain therapy after primary knee endoprosthetics is comparable to catheter-supported regional anaesthesia (manuscript under review at the European Journal of Anaesthesiology). During surgery, the morphine requirement of patients in the LIA group was significantly higher than that of patients who underwent catheterization. Postoperatively, however, both subjective pain by VAS and opiate consumption were comparable. In order to optimize the intraoperative opiate need/consumption, an early-intraoperative procedure for local infiltration anesthesia will now be compared with the previous late-intraoperative procedure. Both procedures correspond to SOP for the treatment of primary knee endoprostheses and are currently used depending on the surgeon's requirements.
Intra-operative hemodynamic management in high-risk surgery is a priority for the anesthesiologist. The current strategy is based on the continuous measurement of cardiac output and its maximization by vascular filling has many limitations: invasiveness, measurement difficulties, impaired performance, imperative surgical restriction of filling, lack of evaluation of flow rate and metabolic needs. Biomarkers may be able to detect early an inadequacy between cardiac output and tissue oxygen requirements, venous saturation with oxygen (ScvO2) and arteriovenous difference in partial pressure of carbon dioxide (ΔPCO2) as well as the appearance of cellular hypoxia (lactate and arteriovenous difference in partial pressure of carbon dioxide/arteriovenous difference in oxygen) (ΔPCO2) / DAVO2). Moreover, the medical literature remains poor on the evaluation of these markers in per-operative context all the more for ΔPCO2 and ΔPCO2 / DAVO2. It seems interesting to evaluate the potential of these tools, in patients with major surgery and at high risk (major hepatectomy, oesophagectomy and duodeno-pancreatectomy), to predict the risk of postoperative complications, especially since surgery involves a restrictive vascular filling strategy that may be potentially deleterious to the patient.
Background: Analgesia remains to this day a challenge for anesthesiologists. Dexmedetomidine, a potent central alpha-2 agonist, has been shown to have analgesic and opioid sparing effects. The classic analgesic strategy focuses on opioid administration guided by estimated time of elimination and hemodynamic response (increase in blood pressure and heart rate). This technique is not sensitive and forces the anesthesiologist to be one step behind nociception, the patient's unconscious response to pain. PMD-200 (Medasense, Israel) displays the Nociceptive level (NOL)-Index as marker of nociception. The NOL-Index ranges from 0 (no nociception) to 100 (intense nociception) and the recommended analgesic range during surgery is from 10 to 25 (Medasense recommendations). The goal of this study is to compare two analgesia strategies guided by the NOL Index (range 10-25) using either remifentanil TCI (target controlled infusion) alone or remifentanil TCI associated with a continuous dexmedetomidine infusion. Methods: A total of 100 patients will be included and informed consent will be acquired. This bi-center study will take place at Erasme University Hospital (primary center) and Saint-Pierre University Hospital. Patients will be randomized into either two groups: remifentanil and placebo versus remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. Both groups will be monitored using the PMD-200 that will guide the analgesic therapy strategy. Investigators and patients will be blinded to dexmedetomidine and placebo administration. The primary outcome will be intraoperative remifentanil consumption. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative opioid administration, opioid associated complications, hemodynamics, and hospital length of stay.
An ileostomy is a surgical opening established by bringing the end or a loop of the ileum to discharge directly outside the body. This is typically done when part or the entire colon is removed because of IBD, cancer, or familial adenomatous polyposis. Reversal of this procedure, an ileostomy closure, may be done if possible. Ileostomy closure involves reconnecting the ileum to the remaining colon, allowing normal bowel movements again. This study will look at the outcomes of these surgeries in patients who were seen and operated on by the investigators.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the intravenous (IV) or paravertebral (PV) lidocaine administration during the intraoperative period of lung resection surgery on the appearance of postoperative complications. We design a randomized, controlled and blinded study to be performed in 153 patients with 3 arms: 1) Lidocaine IV + PV saline 2) saline IV + PV lidocaine, 3) remifentanil IV + PV saline. Perioperative analysis of inflammatory biomarkers in bronchoalveolar lavage and serum. Follow-up of the postoperative course, especially the appearance of postoperative complications according to the revised Clavien-Dindo classification for thoracic surgery, as well as other relevant clinical results.
This is an interventional trial to introduce two short animated videos into preoperative counseling/consent and to compare patient comprehension and satisfaction with a multimedia approach compared to standard of care currently. The investigators anticipate that patients will retain more information about their surgery and peri-operative care and will be more satisfied with a multimedia approach.