View clinical trials related to Portal Hypertension.
Filter by:A observational diagnostic study will be conducted to compare the performance of liver stiffness and spleen stiffness measured by 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and transient elastography (TE) for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in people with compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (cACLD), and explore the cut-off value of 2D-SWE for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH).
A observational diagnostic study will be conducted to compare the performance of liver stiffness and spleen stiffness measured by 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and transient elastography (TE) for diagnosing gastroesophageal varices (GOV) in people with compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (cACLD), and explore the cut-off value of 2D-SWE for diagnosing GOV.
The prevalence of gastric varices is approximately 20%. It is important to note that gastric varices tend to bleed more severely, have a higher morbidity and mortality rate, and have a 35% to 90% risk of rebleeding after the cessation of acute hemorrhage. Because of the relatively low prevalence of gastric varices, the existing clinical studies have many deficiencies, and there is much controversy in the academic community, the optimal treatment and prevention strategies for gastric varices have not yet been fully defined. In the last few years, important advances have been made in the treatment and prevention of gastric variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Experts agree that the combination of pharmacological and endoscopic injection of tissue adhesives should be the first line of therapy in the acute bleeding episode from isolated gastric varices (IGV1) or type 2 gastroesophageal varices (GOV2) varices; whereas transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered a rescue therapy. TIPS has been shown to effectively prevent variceal rebleeding but with a potential increase in the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and/or liver failure. In this sense, a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) in fundal variceal bleeding showed that an early TIPS, performed during the first 5 days after patient admission resulted in a significant decrease in failure to control bleeding and early and late rebleeding. However, the study was conducted for 4 years and only included 25 patients. Due to insufficient sample size, it was unable to reflect whether priority TIPS can bring survival benefits to patients with gastric variceal bleeding. Therefore, there is an urgent need for multi-center clinical studies with large samples to provide high-quality evidence in the field of prioritizing TIPS for the treatment of acute gastric variceal bleeding. The present study aims to compare the preemptive TIPS (performed during the first 72 hours after endoscopy) with standard second prophylaxis (endoscopic injection of tissue adhesives plus carvedilol) for patients with acute bleeding from gastric varices (IGV1 or GOV2). The primary outcome will be a 6-week mortality from inclusion.
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) can lead to a further increase in portal venous pressure and increase the risk of rebleeding. Whether patients with acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding with occlusive PVT benefit from preemptive TIPS is still controversial. The present study is directed at comparing the outcome of patients with acute variceal bleeding with occlusive PVT treated by standard therapy (vasoactive drugs + endoscopic variceal ligation) with or without preemptive TIPS (performed during the first 1-3 days after endoscopic procedure). The primary outcome is survival free of variceal rebleeding at 6 weeks from inclusion.
To validate the safety and efficacy of TIPS (Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt) using PTFE covered stent in the treatment of portal hypertension.
The objective of the study is to collect and evaluate clinical data on patients of the Lifetech Cera™ Vascular Plug System to: - confirm the performance - confirm the safety - identify previously unknown side-effects - monitor the identified side-effects (related to the procedures or to the medical devices) - identify and analyse emergent risks
Portal hypertension is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children with chronic liver disease and portal vein obstruction. It results in severe complications such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and gastrointestinal variceal bleeding. (Sutton et. al., 2018). Esophageal varices is an important manifestation of portal hypertension that develops over time in children with chronic liver disease. The risk of esophageal varices hemorrhage increases depending on the underlying disease as well as the duration of the disease and the mortality rate as high as 5% - 20 % during patient follow up. Invasive procedures such as gastroscopy are performed repeatedly to detect the presence and progression of esophageal varices. Many non-invasive methods have been investigated to their efficacy in determining the presence of esophageal varices and the risk of complications in the presence of portal hypertension. (Taşkın et.al., 2023). Early diagnosis of portal hypertension is often difficult as it can be asymptomatic. During this stage, the patient may feel nothing except for mild fatigue or abdominal discomfort and therefore, patients mostly go undiagnosed (Hartl et.al., 2021). (Selicean et.al., 2021). However, it is worth noting that some of the results from medical investigation may be abnormal during this stage. These include abnormal liver function, abnormal routine blood examination (thrombocytopenia), and changes in the stiffness of the liver which can be found during ultrasound despite the patient being asymptomatic. ( Mohanty et al., 2021). Though the gold standard to diagnose portal hypertension is hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and a value more than 10 mmHg defines clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) ( Man Zhang et.al., 2022). Since HVPG measurement is scarcely available and invasive, several non-invasive tests are used as surrogate markers of CSPH. Amongst them, elastography techniques measuring liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) are the extensively studied ones which can be done by elastography machines that can be attached to conventional ultrasound (USG) machines . Amongst them, 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is the most recent one, and it assesses stiffness and related parameters by tracking shear waves propagated through a media. (Sattanathan et.al., 2023).
There is a need to re-evaluate the patients classified as NCPH and determine whether the new histological classification proposed by the VALDIG applies to the Indian scenario. We intend to identify the patient cohorts who have been diagnosed as NCPH, NCPF, EHPVO, hepatic venous outlet tract obstruction (HVOTO), Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) based on their liver biopsy, endoscopy, HVPG, and radiology reports. These patients will be screened to find the patients who fit the diagnosis of PSVD. It is important to establish whether the new definition of PSVD is relevant to the Indian population and establish the usefulness of invasive tests like liver biopsy in diagnosing the disease. The patient cohorts meeting diagnosis of INCPH will be compared with those meeting the new diagnosis of PSVD. The investigators will describe the clinical (demographic, clinical risk factors, socioeconomic status), etiological (associated conditions, coagulation disorders medication use, genetic risk factors), imaging (based on ultrasound Doppler imaging or cross- sectional imaging), endoscopic, fibrosis tests (using non-invasive tests), and the histopathology of the patients who fulfil the criteria of PSVD.
Comparison of endoscopic therapy combined with non-selective therapy β Receptor blockers (NSBBs) and TIPS in the treatment of liver cirrhosis The impact of reducing bleeding on the survival of critically ill patients. To compare the effect of endoscopic therapy combined with NSBBs drugs and TIPS on rebleeding and incidence of Hepatic encephalopathy in patients with moderate risk of liver cirrhosis hemorrhage.
The goal of this pilot, randomized, single-blind clinical trial is to estimate the effect size of a high and low mean arterial pressure (MAP)-target algorithm among cirrhosis patients hospitalized with acute kidney injury. The main aims to answer are: • Does an algorithm that has low (<80 mmHg) and high (≥80) MAP-targets lead to significant differences in mean arterial pressure? • Are there any serious adverse events (e.g., ischemia) in a high blood pressure algorithm as compared to a low blood pressure algorithm? • Are there any differences in the incidence of AKI reversal in the high v. low MAP-target groups? Participants will be: 1) Randomized to a clinical algorithm that will either target a low (<80 mmHg) or high (≥80 mmHg) MAP. 2) Depending on their group, investigators will titrate commonly used medications to a specific MAP target. Researchers will compare the high and low MAP-target groups to see if these algorithms lead to significant changes in MAP, if they have any impact on AKI reversal, and if there are any adverse events in the high MAP-target group.