View clinical trials related to Peritoneal Metastases.
Filter by:The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate whether pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIPAC), delivered immediately after minimally invasive D2 gastrectomy and repeated 6-8 weeks later, improves 12-month peritoneal disease-free survival in patients with high-risk gastric adenocarcinoma when compared to standard treatment.
The prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer is extremely poor. Although chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has achieved promising efficacy in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, patients with peritoneal metastasis benefit less from this regimen. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represents a novel treatment option, which maintains the high concentration of drugs in the abdominal cavity, and improve the anti-tumor efficacy of chemotherapy drugs through the thermo-thermal effect. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of HIPEC and systemic chemotherapy combined with sintilimab in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis.
The pilot study will investigate the use of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans in 16 patients with peritoneal metastasis originating from abdominal cancers treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. The study will focus on the potential of repeated FDG-PET/CT scans to evaluate the treatment as well as the feasibility in the patient group.
• Suspected patients known to have a primary malignant tumour, patients with metastasis of unknown primary and had incidental peritoneal lesions and will do PET/CT for assessment of peritoneal deposits
This is an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 randomized trial which randomizes patients with isolated resectable colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases to receive preoperative systematic therapy followed by CRS+HIPEC and postoperative chemotherapy or upfront CRS+HIPEC followed by postoperative chemotherapy.
Data demonstrating the efficacy of PIPAC in patients with regionally advanced gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology and/or minimal peritoneal disease is limited due to the relatively recent development of this technique and its historical preferential use in palliative patients with disseminated peritoneal metastasis. Existing data suggest PIPAC administered every six weeks in conjunction with standard treatment may work as an adjunct to conventional systemic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PIPAC protocols have been established both for gastric cancer as well as other intra-abdominal malignancies and have a good safety profile. Given these promising findings, a study protocol is proposed herein to further investigate PIPAC for the treatment of a highly selected group of patients with regionally advanced gastric cancer (positive peritoneal cytology and/or minimal peritoneal disease).
Patients with stage cT3-4N+M0 gastric cancer were recommended to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery in terms of the eradication of micrometastasis in addition to local control, higher compliance with intensive chemotherapy, and avoidance of futile surgery by detection of initially invisible distant metastasis after rapid disease progression. However, in some studies, gastrectomy followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy failed to demonstrate survival benefits for these patients. And peritoneal recurrence was the most common and devastating reason. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was introduced for peritoneal cancer last century. A few studies suggested HIPEC could improve prognosis in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis from various cancer. In summary, we conducted this study to confirm the efficacy and safety of HIPEC after gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
HIPEC-AS01 is an open, prospective, single-center phase II clinical study, which will include "cT4aNxM0, P0 or cTxNxM1, P1" patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic chemotherapy with HIPEC combined with AS in the perioperative period. Patients enrolled will be divided into three groups. Among them, group A is the patients with locally resectable GC; group B is patients with peritoneal metastasis stage P1a or P1b, group C is patients with peritoneal metastasis stage P1c. The primary purpose is to evaluate the 3-year overall survival rate.
Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has prolonged the survival substantially for selected patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer.Bleeding and thromboembolic disease have been reported as postoperative complications related to this advanced open surgical treatment. However, perioperative changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis are only sparsely reported in the literature.The mainstay of treatment with curative intend of none-advanced colorectal cancer is minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The approach is considered associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic disease than open surgery. Despite differences in extent of surgery and thromboembolic risk the same extended thromboprophylaxis regimen for 28 days is currently prescribed to patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC as well as minimally invasive rectal cancer resection. This study aims to investigate all parts of the coagulation system and fibrinolysis, and thereby thromboembolic risk and potential bleeding in two groups of patients with different extent of surgical trauma: 1) Colorectal cancer patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC and 2) rectal cancer patients undergoing minimal invasive rectal cancer resection. Our hypothesis is that patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC are exposed to more aggravated alterations of coagulation and fibrinolysis than patients undergoing minimally invasive rectal cancer resection.