View clinical trials related to Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Filter by:This study evaluates the awareness of mesh discussions in urogynecology among non-urogynecologists. A web-based questionnaire will be sent to four groups. Group-1 is King's College Hospital doctors. Group-2 is Uludag University Hospital doctors. Group-3 is doctors from the United States, and Group-4 is doctors from all over the world.
The trial design is a quasi-experimental cohort trial that includes women referred for pelvic organ prolapse specific physiotherapy. Candidates will be selected via a convenience sampling method from four physiotherapy outpatient departments at a NHS trust within Greater Manchester. The data collection occurred in January-June 2019 and ethical approval was granted by School Research Ethics, University of Salford. Treatment aims to ensure there is respect for their autonomy, treatment is fair (Justice), no harm is done to the participant (nonmaleficence) and treatment benefits the participants (beneficence). Participants are required to complete a consent form prior to their initial session. To ensure methodological quality, the STROBE guidelines will be followed to make certain all apt information required is reported to allow for replication of the intervention. The trial aims to include (n=60) women with a diagnosed pelvic organ prolapse. They are required to complete 16 weeks of supervised pelvic floor exercises with a specialist physiotherapist as documented within the most recent NICE guidelines. The outcome measures used will be the Pelvic Organ Prolapse symptom score (POPSS) and this will be documented before and after the 16 week period. Along side the POPSS, the patients body mass index and severity of pelvic organ prolapse will also be recorded and the results of this will be correlated post trial using the relevant data analysis testing methods.
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Materna Prep Device in reducing pelvic muscle injuries during vaginal delivery. Subjects are randomized to Materna Prep Device or Standard of Care without use of the Materna Prep Device Intervention with the Materna Prep Device is expected to be a one-time use of approximately 30-90 minutes during the 1st stage of labor. Subject participation in the study is targeted to be 12 months from the time of the use of the device during delivery.
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is defined by the International Continence Society (ICS) as a downward displacement of one or several of the followings: "the anterior wall of the vagina", "the posterior wall of the vagina" or "the cervix". Principal risk factor of the POP is the muscular trauma of the Levator Ani Muscle (LAM) or pelvic nerve injury during vaginal delivery and pregnancy. The POP is a real public health problem. Nearly a quarter of the female population will be affected by this pathology during their lifetime. Also, the POP is responsible for impaired quality of life. POP management is mainly surgical. The LAM is classically described as a striated muscle. In an anatomic study based on female human fetuses, it has been described a new representation of nerve supplying LAM innervation with both autonomic and somatic participation. In a second study, it has been observed within the LAM, a visceral medial area (interface with the pelvic viscera) composed of smooth muscle cells under autonomic nervous control and a lateral parietal area (interface with the bone basin) composed of striated muscle cells under somatic control. Because of the medial localization of these smooth muscle areas, it is hypothesed that the visceral medial zone within the LAM plays a major role in pelvic status maintaining. The main goal is to compare the proportion of smooth muscle cells within the MEA in patients with urogenital prolapse and in asymptomatic ones. The secondary objectives are: - To compare the expression of neurotransmitters within smooth muscle cell areas in patients with POPs and asymptomatic patients. - To compare the proportion of striated muscle cells in MEA in patients with POPs and asymptomatic patients.
Prolapse of the pelvic organs is a common pathology in women with a strong impact on the quality of life. Its prevalence tends to increase due to increased life expectancy and obesity. The main treatment is surgical and involves all organ specialists dealing with pelvic-perineal functional disorders: urologists, gynecologists, digestive surgeons. Our team wishes to evaluate, on a cohort of patients operated at the Caen University Hospital, the functional uro-gynecologic, digestive and sexual results of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair by Laparoscopic Promontofixation (PFL) through symptoms and quality of life validated questionnaires (QoL). The analysis of the responses to these questionnaires will allow us to evaluate the functional results in the short and medium term (from 6 months to 5 years)
The aim of the study is to assess at one year the effectiveness of the vaginal patch plastron in comparison of the anterior colporraphy through a combined definition of success: anatomic and functional.
Pelvic organ prolapse(POP) is a common health problem and has significant negative effects on woman's quality of life. Transvaginal mesh procedure is a durable reconstructive surgery, but the mesh kits are expensive for underdeveloped countries. Our preliminary trial showed that the use of self-tailored mesh had good success rate (91.8% at 1-year follow-up) and low complication rate. The trial is designed to compare self-tailored titanium-coated polypropylene mesh procedure with mesh-kit in the treatment of POP stage III-IV in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effective .
Prospective long-term evaluation of the performance and safety of Calistar S for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair in women with anterior POP with or without apical vaginal involvement
SSLF is typically a suture-based attachment of the vaginal apex to the sacrospinous ligament, either unilaterally or bilaterally. It is usually accomplished with specially designed equipment in English-language scientific literature. However, these instruments either reusable or disposable are relatively expensive and difficult in accessibility, and are not yet widely applied around China. Typical Asian smaller pelvis offers us an optional repair procedure with conventional surgical instruments instead of special instrument.
Urogenital prolapse is a frequent and invalidating pathology in women, involving the anterior vaginal wall and the uterus in most cases. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse is present in only 50% of cases. Surgery is an option for women with troublesome prolapse. A woman's lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery by the age of 80 is around 19%. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LS) with synthetic non-absorbable mesh is considered the gold standard, with a composite success rate of 85% at one year (Prospere study). Based on early experience and historical habits, a prerectal mesh was used to be systematically placed in the rectovaginal space, in addition to the anterior and apical mesh placed in the vesicovaginal space, in order to prevent de-novo posterior prolapse (reported rates up to 33%). The benefit of preventive prerectal mesh is questionned on the basis of a single retrospective study comparing 68 LS with double-mesh (anterior & posterior, DM) to 32 LS with a single anterior mesh (SAM): posterior recurrence rates were respectively 5.9 vs. 31.3% (p<0,01), and total recurrence rates 16.2 vs. 43.8% (p<0.01). However, as this difference was not significant in the subgroup of patients without associated cervicocystopexy, the authors concluded that the risk of posterior failure was only due to the cervicocystopexy itself (anti-urinary incontinence procedure which has been abandoned since). On the other hand, a prerectal mesh increases the risk for specific complications: rectal injury (up to 3%), anal pain (up to 25%), mesh exposition (up to 2%). Furthermore the posterior mesh increases the procedure by a minimum of 30 minutes (Robolaps study, unpublished data). The rate of de-novo obstructed defecation after LS with prerectal mesh is reported up to 25%. It could be explained by the mesh itself, but also by nerve injuries during the dissection of the rectovaginal space and rectal stalks.